Throughout the novel Into Thin Air, written by Jon Krakauer, the Everest climbers constantly faced with challenges that came along with their expedition; whether it be lack of oxygen, inability to keep pace with time schedule, weather conditions, etcetera. Every year, every expedition will be unpredictable meaning the outcome of people’s survival is based on the individual’s ability to react appropriately to danger. Since each expedition’s results are uncertain, the guides and clients will be forced to make decisions under pressure when an obstacle obstructs their path. Under pressure, the margin for error begins to decrease. Unfortunately, in circumstances like these, humans are bound to make a mistake since it is a part of human nature. …show more content…
For example, Andy Harris’s death was a result of Krakauer’s and Mike Groom’s mistake of not noticing the obvious, that Harris was showing symptoms of hypoxia. On the South Summit, Harris was frantically saying that all the oxygen bottles were empty although they were in fact all full. When both Groom and Krakauer were unable to acknowledge Harris’s hypoxia, they continued with their descendent without assisting Harris which ultimately was the cause of his death. In the novel, Krakauer explains, “[...] Andy was acting irrationally and had plainly slipped well beyond routine hypoxia, but I was so mentally impeded myself that it simply didn’t register,” (Krakauer 245). Krakauer cannot be at fault for the death of Harris because the lack of oxygen impeded his ability to acknowledge the situation and its unusuality. It is plainly ignorant to expect Krakauer to absorb the circumstances regarding Harris and hold him accountable to save him, a guide who is held to high authority for his ability to climb mountains of high …show more content…
Neal Beidleman was an example of someone who considered the options given to him and chose the one that helped as many people as possible. In chapter 15, “Beidleman tried to coax everyone to their feet [...] were to feeble to walk [...] if somebody from the group didn’t make it to the tents and summon a rescue party, they were all going to die,” (Krakauer 273). In this instance, Beidleman weighed his options which were to either stay put in the storm and have everyone be in danger or have those who are capable of walking go find camp and have a rescue party search for those left in the storm. With his decision making and quick thinking, Beidleman was responsible for multiple people being escorted and led to safety that laid within Camp
Wisdom sparked the need for public awareness. Krakauer’s mission is to provide future awareness, to young men and women, about the risks they may be taking, so that they do not find themselves in same predicaments as McCandless or Krakauer. The only difference between the two is that Krakauer survived to tell his
In the long run, Krakauer concludes that complete arrogance is in part to blame for the tragedy that takes place on Everest. Hall "bragged on more than one occasion that he could get almost any reasonably fit person to the summit. " Their arrogance also caused their clients to lower their guard and not fully appreciate the risks of the expedition. Overall, Krakauer taught many different themes within the novel that everyone should
For as long as anyone can remember, people have dreamed of reaching the summit of Mt. Everest. During May of 1996, an expedition set out to Nepal to attempt a climb up Mt. Everest. By the end of this expedition to the top of Everest, many climbers lost their lives due to the brutal weather. In Jon Krakauer’s novel Into Thin Air, he takes readers through the story of the expedition, and he talks about the climbers who died. Among the list of the dead was a man named Doug Hansen.
Krakauer disagrees with those who think that McCandless did not know what he was doing. Krakouer definitely makes his opinion that he supports McCandless’s ideas known, but by including details opposing his opinion he successfully narrates an impartial
It is unfortunate what happened to the people that died when descending from the summit. However, no one is responsible for those deaths, it was an unexpected storm that killed them. Ultimately a person is not responsible for another person 's action. I believe once a person is near death self-preservation will
In Jon Krakauer’s masterpiece, Into Thin Air, he provides an in-depth explanation of what happened one disastrous day on Mount Everest. While the book is essentially a memoir, it incorporates the excitement of an adventure novel, the suspense of a mystery, and the factual detailing of a school textbook. Jon Krakauer doesn’t leave out any experience to the reader; he very carefully explains every detail so anyone can read his book, even those who have never heard of what happened in Spring of 1996 on Mount Everest. The story essentially explores Jon Krakauer’s months of preparation for and climbing of Mount Everest.
Nevertheless, in the Mann Gulch disaster, the sudden change in wind direction instantly caused the situation to become a highly complex, uncertain situation. In turn, the smoke jumpers were forced to adapt their plan to respond to the urgent situation. As expected, the dire situation led the smoke jumpers to increase their reliance on heuristics. Unfortunately, using heuristics caused most team members to completely ignore biases, overlook contradictory evidence, underestimate time constraints, and use previous personal experiences as a basis for their decision making (Booth, 1993, p.
Some were in their control, meanwhile others were not, the weather for instance being an example of that. When planning to hike Mount Everest, many had prepared themselves ahead of time, meanwhile others not so much. In chapter 7, Krakauer explains the importance of having climbing experience in order to take on a mountain, such as Everest. During the hike, the climbers faced unexpected storms, that even some died from. He also mentions how climbing Everest was a dream to many, however some climbers let that in the way of the reality and didn’t realize the amount of difficulties they would face early on.
Subject: Krakauer clearly delivers his message on the huge risks of this dangerous sport that many people do today. Throughout the book he gives very detailed information about his hike up and gives an appeal to pathos because he talks about losing good friends and how they were when they were found dead and that haunts him 'til today. Occasion: Krakauer is determined to deliver his message on being super cautious when doing dangerous sports just like this one. He shows in the book how describing losing twelve members really makes him feel guilty for being one of the very few alive because he feels like he could of done more.
Throughout chapters 8 and 9, the author showed his bias towards Chris McCandless, which is an act of defiance to his position as an objective journalist, when he attempted to alter the readers’ negative point of view towards Chris by the introduction of different people who had similar experiences and characteristics as him and then making comparison. After reading the previous chapters, the readers have already made their own judgement on Chris, which are probably mostly negative. To address this issue, Krakauer initiates chapter 8 by introducing negative comments and mails not only about Chris but also to him, the author. These will serve as an argument that he will later attempt to disprove while at the same time, still informing the readers about what makes Chris special and unique.
Many people throughout their lives at least once acted recklessly and irrationally to overcome challenges. Without thinking thoughtfully, the actions they performed may have harmed others or themselves. This is why the phrase, “think before you act” is created, to prevent others from performing tactless maneuvers to satisfy their challenges and emotions. In the novel, A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley suggests that individuals who act recklessly in the face of adversity will fail miserably; these reckless actions will cause despair and grief for the individual or others because of their lack of thinking and overwhelming of emotions. In A Brave New World, author Aldous Huxley introduced an Alpha-Plus male named Bernard Marx.
, it is important to note that the characters portrayed in this book are real people. The unique conditions and the weather of the setting forced the climbers to make choices that they could not have made in a different situation. The tough choices made by the climbers and the setting influenced the result of the story. Krakauer’s tone for the most part is respectful toward the guides and climbers, and he narrates as objectively as possible, while including his own concerns and doubts. His tone in the beginning expresses excitement and nervousness, but later turns into
Professional diction is utilized in this passage as Krakauer describes an injury that can affect mountain climbers with low oxygen consumption. The use of strong words like "ailment," "cerebral" and "deteriorate" lead the reader to trust that Krakauer has been educated on this topic. The effect of this diction is the view that the reader has on the author. They may respect Krakauer more now knowing that he is educated on the risks of mountain
As investigator Ken Sleight stated, “That’s what is great about him. He tried. Not many do” (Krakauer 67). He lived out his dreams and in the end, his journey is what killed him, forever making him a tragic
Krakauer explains McCandless’s journey through a unique style of writing that explains the background and details of each statement or scenario which I found to give me a greater understanding of the book but also required me to remember important details which later appeared in the book.