Essay About Bigfoot

The high altitudes and extreme weather of mountain ranges have prevented many people to seek the creature in this region. The forest is where the most bigfoot hunters are more active but still find themselves in secluded areas and harsh environments. To be cut off from the rest of the world makes it that much worse for people to capture evidence of Bigfoot, therefore making it nearly impossible to claim this creature does in fact

Hairs have been found that do not belong to any species. Several eyewitness accounts believe they sincerely saw Bigfoot. Yes, there is evidence going against Bigfoot and for him, but my opinion doesn’t change. It’s possible that he exists, but who has the say in whether he does or doesn’t. The world allows us some type of mystery and if this is what gives some people hope and happiness in believing then why discourage

He found that there were different prints of the two and found that one foot print had come from a crippled beast because the it was probably 8 feet tall. Bigfoot is most likely fake! Conclusion All in all, the Mythical creature Bigfoot is fake! The evidence people have found, have been placed there by others who want trick

For many years, Bigfoot has been, without a doubt, the most recognized mystery in all of North America. Bigfoot has reportedly been sighted thousands of times since the beginning of the 19th Century. Bigfoot is sometimes referred to as Sasquatch, an Indian name, which means “hairy giant”. There have been a lot of eyewitness’s testimonies that Bigfoot is this big gigantic ape covered in thick, brownish fur and towers in at eight feet tall and weighs over six hundred pounds. Many people believe that perhaps Bigfoot is a creature from another dimension or just some phenomenal creature.

Most people think Jack London was a nature faker in his books, White Fang and The Call of the Wild, but he was not. A nature faker is an author that has been accused of humanizing animals which he surely was not doing. Jack London was a great writer that actually understood that animals had feelings way before the technology we have today. This claim has many types of evidence like the following: “How Smart are Dogs” by NOVA, “How Smart is a Dog Really” by Jeffrey Kluger, “Yes, Animals Think and Feel” by Simon Worrall, and “Nature Faker Controversy” by Ralph H. Lutts. This is important because with all this evidence, one can prove anyone wrong if they believe Jack London was a nature faker.

Woolly mammoths (Mammuthus primigenius) have been extinct for a very long time, with the last of the species dying out about 3,600 years ago. But researchers say it may be possible to bring these and other extinct species back from the grave. There is significant controversy and critics over the idea of bring back to life and assert that efforts would be better spent conserving existing or endangered species. Critics of resurrection say reviving extinct animal could do more harm to conservation efforts than good. As for me, I would be disagreeing with the idea proposed.

As later revealed in the film, Hammond was ill equipped to maintain a park of such massiveness. His decision to open the park may have been an innocent attempt at sharing his discovery with the world, but by re-producing dangerous animals and trying to overcome nature’s own will, he expressed excess pride in himself and in his decisions. Technology has presented Hammond with a form of great power, but has not equipped him with the means to control

The Dholes however, are endangered animals and there are very few left in the wild. These wild dogs are very endangered, they are decreasing so much in population because of how hard it is for them to get food for their packs each and everyday. Dholes are pack animals. They are much better suited in a bigger pack than by themselves because of the type of prey that they have to take down. One alone would not be able to

These people are more likely to live longer life and produce more offspring than those who have dissimilarities less positive to long life and offspring production. Scupin (2012:22) in the theory of natural selection Darwin and Wallace emphasized the massive difference that is present in all plant and animal species Darwin’s theory says that man look as if left alone in the world without any heavenly power which could protect him when Darwin’s followers become conscious that man is no more or no less that “ naked ape”, they decided that such close resemblances between man and the rest of the animal world destroyed any purpose of human purpose existence other than that which all animals have. Darwin’s theory

So most of Bigfoot people researchers, have been trying to capture Bigfoot. So i believe that Bigfoot is real because of the evidence they have and pictures and videos they have. Most people believe Bigfoot is real, and they have see him through the woods but, some people believe that Bigfoot doesn't exist. Bigfoot has some kind of humming like a bird so that’s how Bigfoot is at, from his humming s. Bigfoot is a sneaky creature that supposedly inhabits forests such as in the Western United States, Canada and Parts of the Midwest. He has been claimed to be seen walking around and in Forests.

The Kermode Bear The Kermode Bear is a different kind of black bear because it has a gene that normal black bears don’t have. This bear was mentioned in a book called Touching Spirit Bear. This particular bear is a subspecies of the black bear. It has dark nose pads, white or creamy fur, brown eyes, and nearly white claws. This kind of bear is quite rare and maybe about 100 exist near British Columbia.

There has been numerous false sightings because, people just said they saw Big Foot just so they can be on television and that takes down the chances of the people ever catching the legend and our chances are already very slim. Big Foot has made several appearances all over the world and with all of the video evidence and all of the hair samples, all of the foot prints the creature has left somewhere in all of that mix some people are telling the truth. A hiker was on his every morning hike in the mountains and walked upon a footprint that was 18 inches long and 7 inches wide and had a hair sample that matched the hair samples that we had recorded before that. If there has been sightings dated back to the 1800’s why would people be making that up to be on television because, television wasn’t invented until 1927 people wouldn’t have been doing that just to be on television since it wasn’t invented yet, what good would they get out of it there has to be the legend of Big Foot to be true and not a myth. Big Foot has made some people’s lives people have been made famous for the legend and has made millions of dollars from the legend and continue making a living off of him, they have made their lives easier by some creature we don’t even know if it’s true or not.

is it because he 's a gorilla?haramba is a god to us. he was a god for everyone. why did they kill him? is it because he 's a gorilla?haramba is a god to us. he was a god for everyone.

The perceived video and photo evidence depict it as a fairly massive animal, larger than modern man and in the same league as a grizzly bear. However, these photo and video evidences are always of poor quality, possibly the result of photo and video editing techniques. If indeed Sasquatch exists and is of the size depicted, then he would not have avoided valid and verifiable human sightings for so long. The contemporary world is made defined by phones that have cameras, and with everyone owning phones, it would have taken minutes for big foot to be sighted and recorded if he really existed. Additionally, he is presented as a diurnal animal, and this improved the chances for constant sightings if he really existed.