Essay About Philippine Public Administration

Is there a Philippine Public Administration? This question seems very simple to answer for most of us. Some would say, “Yes, we have”, but when asked why they say so, they just emphasize the presence of the government in the country. This question is not as simple as most of us thought of since it requires an extensive analyzation on several aspects of the country’s public administration before arriving at a certain answer. According to Brillantes and Fernandez (2009), there is a Philippine public administration as long as institutions which address specific sectoral concerns exist, there is a massive role of the bureaucracy, and the presence of three major institutions which are: education, politics, and government. Furthermore, they argued that the country’s public administration

For this, each institution will be analyzed in order to determine how he characterized the public administration of the country. First, education – he stated that education in the Philippines is the weakest in history and science. What he meant by this is that the country doesn’t have its own history. The author opposed to Marcos’ claim that Tadhana was the history of Filipinos. He argued that most of the population by name are Spaniards and only two-tenths of one percent were the native population. Thus, foreigners were the main characters in this history, not the Filipinos. On the other hand, the essence of science and technology was undermined because of the deceiving actions projected by the government. News and reality were overshadowed by illusion and image. In addition, the government did not seem bothered on whether its agencies and/or departments work accordingly or not. One clear manifestation of this is presented in the article wherein the government didn’t pay attention to the Bureau of Standards which is not serving the people with clear and precise standards and