“War is like love, it always finds a way” (Bertolt Brecht). Although one is pure and the other evil, the forces of both love and war influence the best stories. A more interesting topic emerges when a character must choose between loyalty to a loved one and devotion to government. In “The Sniper” and “Cranes” the main character is involved in a civil war that calls for allegiance to the government despite his feelings for a loved one who fights for the opposite cause. “The Sniper” and “Cranes” are two similar pieces of literature, however both stories are different and unique from one another. Although these stories share similarities in the plot, the characters, and the theme they also show many differences.
In both stories the plots are similar;
…show more content…
In both plots the main characters are faced with either dying themselves or killing a close friend or family member. Also, both plots end after the main characters make their decision to live themselves or kill a loved one. In both plots that civil war has harmful effects on people both internally and externally. The two plots are similar in these ways, they differ however, when it comes to...
The characters in both stories are similar, but they also have many differences. Normally, soldiers fight against strangers, but in both stories the main characters fight against a close friend or a family member. In both “Cranes” and “The Sniper” the main characters deal with many hardships of war. The characters are tested for strength, loyalty, and kindness. They have to choose between their allegiance to the government or loyalty to family and friends. Both stories show realistic hardships of war that the main characters must surpass. In “The Sniper” the main character fights against another sniper, his brother. In “Cranes” the main character does not fight a family member but he is tasked with escorting his childhood friend to
Walt Whitman’s “The Artilleryman’s Vision” and the letter to his mother are two pieces of work by the same author. The two pieces of work share some key differences. Other than being two different types of works, there differences go deeper than that. The characters and settings are both very different and yet, they still manage to to seem similar. They also have completely different writing styles and choice of words due to the different writing styles.
The most obvious difference between the stories is the way they portray their protagonists. Both epitomize the values and struggles of their respective cultures, yet both are wildly different.
Do you ever contemplate about what it would be like to be in combat in the Civil War because if so readers can get a good outlook of what it would be like to fight on the union side in both of these books The Red Badge of Courage and the Soldier’s Heart. In this essay one will be contrasting the two stories mentioned earlier. As well in this essay one will be comparing these two very informational and exciting stories about the civil war and the characters as well as how ironically the two characters have very many resemblances. While reading this essay one comprehends the two stories similarities and differences, also the reader will acquire knowledge about how the main characters in both of the stories have very similar points of view. There are very few differences between the stories Red Badge of Courage and Soldier’s Heart here are a few just to show how little they have in differences.
These stories are similar in many different ways, such as they both include death and the attempt to stop the conflict. There are many for similarities to the
Though very different in plot, these two stories are very similar in many ways. They were
“Grandpa's Badge of Courage” and “Friends Dilemma”, are two stories about love and respect. They share both similarities and differences. The two have similar themes and textual structures. They share similar messages or themes shown in different ways. First of all, the theme of "Grandpa's Badge of Courage" is love can change an opinion.
The books that are being compared and contrasted are both about The Civil War and what these soldiers went through. Each book has a few differences that separate them. The books are based on the same time period so they are going to have a lot in common. The books describe what both characters had to go through during the war. The differences in the book will show you how each soldier went through the war differently and the similarity’s will show you how it was for most of the soldiers in the Civil War.
Regret is a powerful emotion that has the ability to scar someone for the rest of their life. Moments of regret can come from relationships, self-made decisions and life changing events. The idea of regret also applies to “A Marker on the Side of the Boat” by Bao Ninh and “On the Rainy River” by Tim O’Brien. Although these two literary pieces are very different in many ways, both authors describe the experience of the Vietnam War as a time of regretful decisions that negatively impacted people of both the American side and the Vietnamese side. Both authors tell a story about a character that recalls of flashbacks of the war, where they grieve over the past decisions that have affected them for the rest of their life.
Gloria Bird VS Sherman Alexie Gloria Bird’s Turtle Lake and Sherman Alexie’s The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven” are two stories written by Native American authors. When reading these two stories, one would not make any type of connection between them. Both are unique in their own way, but if he or she looks a little closer the similarities and differences become clear. To begin, both of the stories are distinct in their own way.
Both stories clearly demonstrate the character’s view and the path each character took to achieving success. Clearly, there were some major differences in both stories that made it
In Liam O’Flaherty’s The Sniper, the main character, a sniper, is in the middle of a civil war in Dublin, Ireland. It is his assigned duty to assassinate anyone on the the other side of the war, no matter who they are. This creates a huge conflict, considering that the sniper ends up killing his brother. This supports the central theme that war is cruel, and this can be supported by the craft elements of the dialogue used and the setting of the story.
Although, they have similarity, the two stories has major differences also. First, both author differs the way they introduce and develop their lead characters to the reader. Second, they also differ in perspective from which their stories are being told. Third, they differs on the choice of settings and how it impact to the stories.
In O’Flaherty’s “The Sniper” and Hardy’s “The Man He Killed” both works use plot, irony, and theme to portray the idea that war causes you to kill those you care or may have cared about. There are many similarities and differences In the plot of both “The Sniper” and “The Man He Killed”, there are many similarities and differences.
First person. For centuries the notion of war as an exciting and romantic endeavor has existed until Stephen Crane DE glorified war in his novel The Red Badge of Courage. He tells about the true nature and experience of war through a young soldier Henry Fleming and contrasts it with his romantic imagination. Crane introduces a more realistic approach to war which is in contrast to Henry’s expectations.
If you knew who you were shooting at, would you pull the trigger? In the story called ¨The Sniper¨ by Liam O'Flaherty, a man, who is referred to as ´the sniper´ is about a man who is in a war in Dublin. The first thing that happens is when he shoots a man in a turret and a woman. Then he gets shot in the arm. Then he shoots an enemy sniper.