The destruction of the United States was transpiring, the reason for this would be the disagreements that the moral views on slavery caused throughout the nation. When the people of our nation believe something should change, they will not hesitate to speak up, and as a result of this a variety of problems have arisen. Furthermore, the strong views on slavery that humankind holds is influencing the people to get involved and fight to obtain their goal, because of this the tension between the North and South is increasing. Although the North and the South have mismatched opinions on slavery, it is important that they are able to compromise to keep the nation united so that both sides are content with the aftermath of the conflict. The main cause …show more content…
John Brown’s, “Address of John Brown to the Virginia Court” shows how much a man from the North cares about his people,“‘Now if it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life for the furtherance of the ends of justice and MINGLE MY BLOOD FURTHER WITH THE BLOOD OF MY CHILDREN, and with the blood of millions in this slave country whose rights are disregarded by wicked, cruel, and unjust enactments—I submit; so LET IT BE DONE.”’ This man from the North who allowed his lips to speak these words had previously freed slaves and is now being penalized for his unjust comportment; his words show the extent of his care towards others. Because of this strong willed man’s actions, he gives a perfect example of the passion that most civilians of the North have regarding the freedom of the enslaved. The document on “Mississippi’s Declaration of Secession” describes what drives the people of the South to take initiative to achieve what they aspire for, the continued success of their goal in keeping slavery in action, “We must either submit to degradation [loss of self respect], and to the loss of property worth four billions of money, or we must secede from the Union framed by our fathers, to secure this as well as every other species of property.” The Southerners seem to feel that the government is becoming an advocate of the North and they will not stand for that. As a result they continuously voice their concerns and will defy the government if it is required in order to mold others view on slavery so that they are able to see slavery as perpetual as the Southerners believe it to be. Because of this the Southerners won’t give up on developing a society where slavery is flourishing because they believe that slaves are a necessity in order to have a functioning society, meanwhile the Northerners will do whatever they can to ensure all slaves are able to live
For several decades slavery ran ramped in the United States, and by the 1850s-1860s there were different opinions about whether to keep it, abolish it, or contain it where it is. Most understand that the south was pro-slavery, their further intentions were to expand into the new territories the US had purchased from Mexico and from the Louisiana Purchase. Then, there was a small minority group in the north that wished to abolish slavery from the entire US, and this group was disliked by both northerners and southerners. The majority of the north, however, didn’t mind keeping slavery in the south where it already existed, but they did not want it to expand into the new states Congress was carving out of the purchased territories. Each of this groups disliked one
Northern also disagreed with the expansion of slavery West because they knew it would discourage free laborers from settling in the area. Senator of South Carolina Calhoun argued that Congress had no right to say whether slavery should or shouldn’t occur in new territory because territory belong
Moreover, Congressman Bonham argued that slavery was a “moral, social, and political blessing” and that it would “be preserved in or out of the Union.” Lastly, slavery was the foundation of Southern identity and was South Carolina’s official cause of secession, not fears of white slavery, and not fears of political slavery in a nebulous republican cosmology. (Pg.
"The two systems [slave and free-labor] are... incompatible. They have never permanently existed together in one country, and they never can. "- Republican Senator William H. Seward, from a speech entitled "On The Irrepressible Conflict," delivered in New York, 185851. The South and the North had differences in ideas, economy, politics, etc.
Notably, Senator Henry Clay gave a speech to the Senate that he could not imagine that a slave state, in this case, South Carolina, actually wanted to secede from the Union in 1833 (Document A). The growing tension between the North and South seemed to not phase the Republicans, Henry Clay’s party. Perhaps if the idea of secession had been taken carefully from the beginning, the Civil War would have been different. Nonetheless, the ever-growing debate on slavery was growing. In 1834, an annual report from the American Anti-Slavery Society labeled slave owners as thieves of humans and that slaves should be freed immediately (Document B).
In the years of 1820s through the 1860s, a growing sectional conflict centered around slavery signaled the coming of a war between the north and the south, which almost tore down the union. According to some revisionist historians, Civil War, one of the greatest tragedies in the American history, was absolutely avoidable and resulted merely from “fanaticism and misunderstanding,” along with the failure of the political leaders to compromise; however, this is not the case. Looking back into history, the war was arguably made inevitable by the the cause of slavery. A series of factors in the antebellum age led to the outbreak of Civil War; these factors included social differences, economic issues, as well as political tensions generated by
The Civil War was America’s most devastating conflict in terms of casualties and property destroyed. The war started after the southern states seceded from the Union and southern troops fired on a Union fort in Charleston harbor. Prior to the war there had been lots of tension between the northern and the southern states over the issue of slavery. The dissolution of the United States prior to the Civil War was the result of southern opposition to growing anti-slavery sentiments in the north, dissatisfaction with political compromises especially those relating to slavery in western states, and general concerns about the future of a post slavery southern economy.
The northerners believe it’s an accomplishment that the slaves were freed. The northerners think that abolishing slavery in the south is the next level of change for American. Without changes, slavery would have continued and changes may take longer before it can still happen. From the southerner’s point of view, it looked surprising and not many were happy with the changes because they were used to the laws that were occurring before slavery ended. Southerners were not used to what was going to happen when early civil rights will happen.
In the era before the civil war, specifically in the era post-purchase of the Louisiana territories, sectionalism between the Northern and Southern territories spread like wildfire. The Northern states, mainly focusing on commercial and industrial economy, supported the idea of the freedom of slaves. On the other hand, the South, a mainly agricultural and rural society, supported the idea of slaves and slave labor to work in the plantations of white men. These differences would later spark many conflicts (including the Civil War), in which the North was fighting for the freedom of slaves and the South was fighting for the keeping of slaves, especially in new additional territories.
This divide in the government made it hard for the states to work together, and “the inability to take decisive action against slavery in the decades immediately following the Revolution permitted the size of the enslaved population to grow… eventually over 600,000 Americans would die… to resolve the crisis” (88). Had the Northerners spoken up for what they knew was right, the nation might have been able to civilly reach an agreement. However, since the Northerns chose silence, but did not conform to Southern ways, bitterness developed between the two sides, and years later the Civil War
If a southerner wants to get a slave all they have to is get a certificate from a southern judge saying that it is his or her slave. The northerners were outraged because slavery was outlawed in the north so they didn't want to be a part of it. Many of the northerners were abolitionists. An abolitionist is
The South, for example, believes that they never affected or aggressed the North in any way and blamed the North for starting the war when they just wanted to be left alone. To support my statement, the newspaper, “New Orleans Daily Crescent”, documented that, “We have never aggressed upon the North...” and, “...we have only asked to be let alone...”. While the North on the other hand, believes that slavery in the South is wrong and that it’s a sin; they believe it must be stopped. Union Sergeant Phineas Hager wrote in a letter saying, “...the more I learn of the cursed institution of Slavery, the more I feel willing to endure, for its final destruction.”. The Union side of the war believes that slavery is “cursed”, or in other words, it’s bad.
John Brown is the man who famously lead the Harpers Ferry raid and was captured and hung for his failed attempt. He was attempting to free the slaves in a town where they did not want to be freed. His failed attempt lead to the deaths of many of his own men and innocent townspeople. Why would anyone attempt such a task? Is John Brown Insane?
The Petition of Slaves to the Massachusetts Legislature offers compelling insight into the slaves thirst for freedom in America. The petition states that “they have in common with all other men a natural and unalienable right to freedom which the Great Parent of the Universe has bestowed equally on all mankind.” The Constitution, by no means, protected the natural and unalienable right to freedom for all
Southerners believed that the U.S. was made for and by the white race, and that the Africans had no part of their establishment. They believed that slaves were justified by the “..experience of mankind, and the revealed will of the almighty creator.” (Document B.) They did not want to give up their businesses or their beliefs too soon therefore, they