The development of theories could enable animals to be included as recipients of justice. But, even if they were moral agents, it does not rule out the protection to animals from cruel treatment. What counts as cruel treatment is when the use of animals stops being beneficial to humans. The structure of domination by systematic oppression is borderline exploitation and marginalization when animals are killed in the name of human culture or are precisely raised for food. There should be an inclusion of animals in the scope of justice because we share the physical world.
Elephants and Rhinos are slaughtered for their ivory tusks every year. Some people also just kill for the sport of it. This is far from okay. These innocent animals are not hurting anyone. I understand that financial concerns also drive poaching from many natives.
This one photograph she took shows how these animals are so deprived of freedom. To conclude, the loss of freedom is also a major issue in zoos and is also another reason why animals should not be held in
For example, he talks on how puppies are not equal being that they do not really know what voting is and they do not have a benefit to vote. Secondly, he talks on how being able to experience things like pleasure and pain is a criterion of moral importance. He talks on the example if ow animals feel pain just as much as humans.
Normal citizens should not be able to keep dangerous animals as pets. It will be a big responsibility to take. It will cause dangers and diseases to the people who are around the exotic pet. The animals will need to rely on a lot of resources that may possibly be very expensive this could lead the animal neglected and malnourished. By their very nature, the animals are wild and potentially dangerous and do not adjust well to a captive environment.
Often animal testing fails, and it is cruel to play with their lives. However; animal testing saves not only lots of people's lives, but also animals’ too. It is very important and even necessary for having a healthy environment, without diseases. It is unethical to keep animals in laboratories and make them suffer from pain. However, animal research is highly regulated with laws, and any unjustified action will not take place during the testing.
This topic can be very touchy to some people and can sometimes cause disputes. People such as animal activists go against zoos and aquariums and try to show the problems with zoos and aquariums. Some of the issues they bring up about these places is that it is inhumane to keep these animals
Their living conditions can not be good because of their health are getting hurt. Puppy mills need a place to live, but have to depends on their conditions. Animals come in different forms by kicking and hitting them. Where does animal occur. Abuse can occur at home more than shelter.
Captivity needs to stop because the Orcas don’t live as long, they take the Orcas away from their natural habitat and families, and most of all they need space to swim. One reason that Orcas should not be held captive is because, they don’t live as long. Some people might say that the Orcas at aquariums are very taken care of. But I argue that Orcas do not live as long as they would in
These animals may be the property of humans but the animals are not forced to obey the humans or work for them, which shows that it is an invalid comparison. Furthermore, animals have different demands, wants and needs compared to humans as they are different species that live under different conditions, where humans do not know what the animals want as there is no communication between the animals and humans. Therefore, each species should have a different type of lifestyle and different rights, so the authors argument towards animals and humans having similar rights is irrational. In addition, the authors are against the property of animals by humans yet have six dogs as pets which make them hypocritical since these pets are considered their property. They cannot set an example towards the issue they are discussing, which is the rights of animals not to be property, when they are going against their own argument by having six animals as their