We All Have Rights Did you know that about over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year. The reason these animals die is because they are experimented on but half of the time the experiment does not even work. Scientist use animals for medical research to try and find a cure for a disease. All different kind of animals are tested but mostly they are mice, rats, monkeys, and rabbits. Scientist test all different kind of drugs on the animal to see if they can cure the disease the animal has, if it works on the animals it might have a chance to work on humans. The problem is that the chance is really small. Medical research should not be tested on animals because almost all the experiments that are tested on animals are too harmful …show more content…
For example it states this in this quote, “In one case, an AIDS vaccine that was shown to be effective in monkeys failed in human clinical trials because it did not prevent people from developing AIDS, and some believe that it made them more susceptible to the disease” (Thompson). This is explaining that the vaccine they used on the monkey was successful but when they tried it on the human it failed. They believed that instead of the vaccine helping it made the disease worse. So why should they test on animals when the vaccine that works on animals would not work on humans. Another quote also states this, “The Food and Drug Administration reported that 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans” (PETA). This is showing that 92% of all the drugs that help the animals get cured did not help the humans at all. The drug fails on the human but is successful on the animal. Over all using animals for medical research is pointless because the drugs or vaccines that work on the animals barely work on humans because they are too dangerous and don have an
According to one of the largest organizations for social change with 4.3 million members: Do Something, the article “11 Facts About Animal Testing” states, “92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work.” Even after scientists force innocent animals into excruciating pain, the results are proven to be meaningless. This delineates how impractical animal testing is. By the same token, according to Pro-Con, a nonprofit public charity that provides research on more than 50 controversial topics, “Paul Furlong, Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University (UK), states that ‘it's very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the human.’” This demonstrates how distinct animals and humans are and proves we should not use animals as a representation people.
Civil liberties are rights guaranteed to citizens in the Constitution that the government cannot interfere with, however, in the name of national security, they do. The government sometimes finds it necessary for Americans to give up some of their basic rights to keep the nation protected, but many people find this unnecessary. A law-abiding citizen’s extremely personal information should not be essential to finding terroristic threats within this society. Under no circumstances should an American citizen’s civil liberties be violated in a time of war or crisis, because those are assured rights that are most valuable to their freedom during national conflicts.
However, the animal groups are misrepresenting the data and taking the data completely out of context. The high failure rate means that the trials are working correctly to ensure potentially dangerous medicines or those that are ineffective do not make it onto the market. The animal trials help prevent many potentially dangerous medicines from reaching the human stage of testing, and could not be done any other way without placing human subjects at undue risk. However, several animal rights groups have spun these numbers and place them in their own context in order to make the number appear to back their
Some have said that using animals is contradicting our claim on finding accurate cures because animals are different than humans which means they will react differently. Although this is true and they are not exact carbon copies of us, they are close enough to receive results from. Vittana.org states, “The reason why mice are frequently used in animal research is that their genetic profile is 98% similar to
The scientists and doctors treat the living beings with such disrespect, ignorance, and cruelty. They treat it as if it is a test object, but not a living being. Also, animal use cannot always be reliable and accurate. For example, many drugs that appear safe and effective in animals fail in humans, or cause significant harm and sometimes even death. A 2004 study from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration found that 92 percent of drugs entering clinical trials following animal testing fail to be approved.
The opponents ' evidence is unreliable in that the studies of animal testing were conducted in 2010, and since then, laws and techniques have been changed to help prevent animal cruelty. Since laws have been implemented, scientists are taking precautions to prevent animal cruelty. It is obvious that these precautions are yielding good results because cures are being found. Additionally, it would be even more cruel to test on humans as well as more expensive. There are many consequences to human testing.
Horses, cats, dogs, bird and even fish are now used in testings. These animals were just a few of the hundreds used for the research and testing. Animal testing should be prohibited because it’s cruel and inhumane, animals are being tortured while in those labs, and the experiments are wasting animals
For example, the article “Animal Testing has a purpose” states, “Today the (Food and Drug Administration) FDA sets higher standards for drug testing. Before a drug can even make it to the animal testing stage, it must first pass metabolic studies that prove the drug will be safe in human tissue. These new regulations are designed to save human lives.”
Animals have similar anatomy to humans, but it is still vastly different. What works on an animal could have a totally different effect on humans. For example, according to the FDA, Vioxx, a drug used to treat arthritis, was found to be safe when tested in monkeys (and five other animal species) but has been estimated to have caused around 320,000 heart attacks and strokes and 140,000 deaths worldwide. This proves that medical testing on animals isn’t necessarily beneficial considering the physiological differences between man and animal. But that’s not the only case of medical testing gone wrong.
Technology is advancing, and the need for animal testing has vanished. There are several alternate methods that are much more effective than using rats or monkeys, not to mention cheaper. Studying cell structures in a petri-dish, micro-dosing, artificial human skin, and computer models have all done away with the need for animal testing. These methods have proved to be more successful, due to the fact that actual human cells are used rather than that of a difference species. These methods ensure safety for all animals, find cures and treatments, and save our country loads of
In the article The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation by Aysha Akhtar, she sums up the average truth and beliefs of someone who knows that this form of testing should be outlawed due to the unreliability of accurate results. In this article, Aysha reveals the validity and unreliability of testing on animals due to the differences in a growing and developing body compared to a helpless non-human animal with a different body make-up. She clearly discusses the number of animals that are being tested annually, “more than 115 million” (Akhtar, p. 407), with either human diseases or medical products. She goes on to say that obviously, medications and diseases should be further researched and have a prior evidence basis before being in contact with humans, though testing on such helpless animals that are not nearly as close to humans as they assume, give a unlikely truth to the results and do not clearly show the effects of medications or diseases would have on the average human (Akhtar, p.
Imagine an enraged animal rights activist charging toward a scientist in a white lab coat, desperate to free the little mice that are being used as test subjects. Although comical, this scene may be quite accurate when describing the passion that animal lovers have when it comes to the touchy subject of animal testing. For centuries, animal testing has been used in the medical research field, however many are now beginning to question whether it is ethical. Millions of animals are killed per year due to animal testing, so is this practice worth banning? Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral.
The animals that are used are treated badly at the laboratories, they are abused and end up being killed basically from all of the tests they are forced to go through. In some cases, the animals are forced to become addicted to drugs, alcohol and even tobacco. From all the tests, the animals experience a tremendous amount of stress on a day-to-day basis, no living thing should have to go through that just to make someone more money. The stress that they get may also affect the way that the tests results can turn out, this proving that animals being used for testing in research is not good in any circumstance. As stated by Cimons, “We have cured cancer in mic for decades-
Everyday, animals are shocked, poisoned, and killed not only by animal abusers, but also by vivisectors, which are people that perform experiments on animals. Animal testing is cruel, pointless, and completely wrong. If the tests that were performed on animals were performed outside of a factory, the person doing the experiment would be arrested for animal abuse, yet they don't seem to think it is wrong. Animal abuse is a felony, and people are doing it every day with no qualms about torturing animals for their own personal gain. Not only that, but only about 25 new medicines are released each year, which is absolutely nothing compared to the amount of medicines they test and the amount of animals they test upon, and that creates a pointless waste of innocent lives.
As stated above, animals should be continued to be used in research testing because it leads to more vaccinations for humans and animals. In “Use of Animals in Biomedical Research”, the American Medical Association states “A longer lifespan has been achieved, decreased infant mortality has occurred, effective treatments have been developed for many