Books are a way for people to explore their world and other worlds. Books are either window books where you see into another world or mirror books where you see it reflect something in your life. While children in elementary schools in America have access to books, books are beginning to be censored. (Context). Want to become an elementary teacher, and this topic is important to me. (Point of View). Children learn so much through reading, not only do they learn vocabulary words and grammar but also learn about other cultures and themselves. (Information). Many books that are being banned from elementary schools are being challenged because they are dealing with mature topics. Most parents are challenging these books to stop their children from …show more content…
They learn words and grammar but also about other people and cultures. They learn about the world in which they live and about worlds on the other side of the planet. There is so much information that is learned through reading and children can explore worlds not just about other cultures but also explore worlds that reflect them and their lives. There are two types of books, windows and mirrors, in each, they show the reader a story and these stories, depending on the background of the reader, are either a reflection of themselves or a story they see through lenses. “Books are a portal to different life experiences and reading encourages empathy and social-emotional development.” (Banned Books – Top 3 Pros and Cons). (Information). Having books in the school libraries that reflect all students and also show all students other worlds is important for students whose minds are growing. “Books offer a reflection of our own stories and a chance to see ourselves differently. Books open up doorways to explore our history and to envision our future.” (In Celebration of Banned Books Week). (Relevant). Having these books helps students be exposed to different situations that they may not be exposed to before. This helps students grow to be good members of society one day. Therefore, banning books in elementary school is stopping children from exploring their worlds and other worlds. (Implications and …show more content…
This idea of censoring the students from being able to choose freely what books they want to read are concerning. Students should be allowed to walk into a library and choose which book interests them the best. “Censorship denies our freedom as individuals to choose and think for ourselves.” (Read a Banned Book). (Information). By challenging books and taking them out of the libraries in schools, the students are denied the right to pick freely their books. Instead, the books are being picked for them and it is censoring what they can and will not see. The students find on the shelf books that people had picked not to ban which can cause issues since most books that are being banned have a storyline dealing with minority groups. (Clearness). “Books that are frequently challenged contain content about diverse populations, such as Black, LGBTQ+ or other minority groups.” (Brawley). This pattern shows that most parents are wanting to shut down their children from reading about minority groups. (Assumptions). Hence why the one argument against banning books in elementary schools is the parents causing censorship. It is unfair for students of these minority groups to walk through a library and not find books that represent them and showcase a main character who looks or has the same background as
Anytown School Board, 11,300 books have been put in question for possible removal since 1982. The School Board is trying to make it so that the book Fahrenheit 451 is not a part of any school curriculum or read on campus by students. While parents do have the right to decide whether or not reading material is appropriate for their children, it should be a choice that affects their child only, not the entire population of students. I feel the banishment of the novel Fahrenheit 451 is unjust and is explicit censorship. An important reason we shouldn’t allow books to be censored in school libraries is that it’s taking away student’s right to read books of their choosing.
and i used three different texts below from the articles I got. Then, I decided to use these three texts from each of the articles because two of them mostly talked about decisions people came up during the 1950s and now with to decide whether they should ban books depending on their views of what’s right or wrong. This text tells us that there is no point in banning books because many kids these days are aware of sex, gender, violence etc. However the Keller high school is considering banning these types of books with sexual, violence or anything that could be inappropriate for the school district.
Censoring Books In Public Schools Is Necessary To Protect The Children Books have been censored for decades, mostly for secular and religious reasons. With the invention of the printing press in 1450, it became harder to eliminate offensive books, however a study conducted at the American Library Association (ALA), says that most books have been challenged by parents followed by patrons, a board or administration, librarians or teachers, political and religious groups, and the government. The same study showed that “sexually explicit content, offensive language, and "unsuited to any age group" are the top three reasons cited for requesting a book to be removed” (“Banned Books”). Books in public schools should continue to be censored for the protection of children and the improvement of society.
Novels are filled with lessons vital to a developing brain, due to their ability to teach caution and create experiences. In summation, the fallacious act of banning books from students and others willing to learn is utterly
However, those people are wrong because parents rights and parental monitoring can be a fix to this problem. In the book, Censorship, it states that “Books written by black, chicano, and homosexual authors represented on its pages; these books are frequently the targets of campaigns by parents and right wing groups which claim these books are unfit to be read and taught to children in schools” (Current Controversies, 2001, p.63). It is good that parents want to protect their children and they have the right to do so but, because they take away books many students can relate to the authors and believe it is unfit, the students may feel like outcast themselves. The book, Censorship, also states that “Choices to use some books and reject others are made constantly, and parents are doing nothing wrong in trying to influence those choices” (Current Controversies, 2001, p.63). Parents are trying to do good when they ban books, but are also taking books away from other people too.
Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.
Books are an essential way to gain knowledge whether they are controversial or not. Thousands of books have been banned from public libraries and schools due to being deemed ‘inappropriate’ by parents, administrators, or religious leaders. Whether Americans should ban books in public libraries and schools is an often debated topic. This censorship of books is dangerous, as it restricts the American people's’ ability to access information, leaving Americans ignorant. Historically, banning books is not a new practice.
At one point in time, over 7,220 books have been challenged to be banned. Though these books have been removed for the safety of children, not all books should be banned for many reasons. These include the fact that banning books is infringing on the First Amendment, keeping children from understanding the real world, and, even though there are many reasons for book banning, not banning books could help a student’s education and can even work against itself. Banning a book from a school or public library could go against a person’s First Amendment of the freedom of press.
1.) Books can be amongst some of the best teachers. Furthermore books teach us many things like new vocabulary and new ways of thinking, so we should embrace all books and not ban them. 2.) Additionally, most banned books go on to become classics.
First, this text states, “Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics” (Procon.org). To explain, parents are banning books from schools because they do not want their children to be exposed to these inappropriate topics. Moreover, banning these inappropriate topic books would be a great deal for parents and their children. Furthermore, the same text states that “Keeping books with an inappropriate content out of libraries protects kids, but does not stop people from
Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.
In some cases books were banned from schools because parents believed there kids should not be opened to certain topic in the stories. Another issue is students have been sent home to read books for certain classes that talk about touchy subjects. For example, religion and magic. Parents
Every child deserves a proper education. Banned books are depriving students of a well rounded, culturally aware, literary education because of the culture that is discarded, the history that is being withheld, and the education that young people could get through these banned books. The point of history is to learn from it and learn from others mistakes, but how can we do that if we are not allowed to learn it. As teachers shouldn’t you be teaching us how to make judgment calls like understanding that Mark Twain was a racist, but a man of his time and that doesn’t change him being an amazing writer. We cannot learn things such as that if we cannot even read most of Mark Twain’s books.
[21]” (ProCon.org). Banning books in school can create a problem for the teachers that are trying to assign something to the class. With the new addition to the first amendment schools will have the rights to any books. When books are banned the life lessons in the books are also
Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.