Even though there are many people claims that banning smoking in the public will bring many benefits to the society, however, this statement is only up to a certain extent. In fact, there are many arguments that disagree with the legalisation of banning smoking in the public area. Banning smoking would infringe a person’s choice and right and affect the business and economy of a country.
The government should not implement the smoking ban in the public it is because banning smoking is an act of infringing a person’s choice and right. The government should not regulate a person’s choice and right just because smoking is harmful. Many people have also voiced out their opinion that other habits, for instance consuming alcohol, smoking marijuana
…show more content…
According to the BBC news, there has been a drastic decline in trade after the ban was introduced. It is because the smoking ban has reduced the potential tax revenue that can be received by country.Those smoking products are heavily taxed which brings in billion of annual revenue to the country. Therefore, it was undeniable that the tax revenue from the cigarette has contributed a lot to the economy of a country. However, once the smoking ban was implemented it cause the number of smokers to decrease severely. According to a report, it shows that the smoker in England has dropped from 30% in the year 2005 to 21% in the year 2008 and this indicate that the number of the smoker has decreased after the smoking ban (Bauld 2011). In addition, due to the judgment of another non-smoker and public disapproval many smokers has reduced cigarette consumption largely. Thus, this phenomenon has negatively influenced the tax revenue gained by the government as people are buying fewer cigarettes smoker because they cannot smoke like the way they use to smoke at the public. Moreover, the other concern of smoking ban is the sales and profits of the bar and restaurant have lowered (Bauld 2011). This happened due to the people does not socialise at the pub anymore. After the ban, many people have chosen to curtail their social outing and rather smoke at home because of the inconveniences of going outdoor to smoke. Those smokers have lost their sense of pleasures of socialising in the café and bar with their friends and peers. Not only that, it has caused many restaurants, pubs, and café lost their regular customer as most of the smoker will find somewhere else to drink where they can smoke. Therefore, the income of those pubs and café were greatly affected by the smoking
With careful input, after more than 10 long years of trying to enforce the unrealistic law, the government acknowledge that prohibition was a grand loss. The 21st amendment, approved in 1933, finished the failed experiment and reestablished Americans’ legal right to drink whatever they would please. Prohibition should have educated the government about attempting to readjust personal
Stress from events such as the Oklahoma City Bombing causes people to smoke. Studies show that tragedies such as the 9-11 attacks or the Oklahoma City Bombing causes people to smoke, which can lead to other negative effects. Most people remember where they were when the Oklahoma City Bombing happened. In the Oklahoma City Bombing “A total of 168 persons died and 675 persons sustained injuries”(Sample). If someone saw on the news that a building blew up and American lives were taken one could assume that would cause a lot of stress.
Specific Purpose Statement: To invite my audience to consider the advantages and disadvantages of smoking cigarettes so that they can make an informed decision on whether or not to smoke them Thesis: There are two obvious stances on cigarettes: pro-cigarette and anti-cigarette. Today I would like to explore these two stances and have a discussion about your current views. Introduction:
The benefits and progress shown by the introduction of the smoking ban include: • The public began to be more aware of the dangers of passive smoking. • Smoking rates began to decline following the introduction of the ban and have continued to fall each year • Attendances to A&E with smoking related conditions have
A daily basis of only adults smoking could change and evolve into the whole population, from all ages, getting into that unhealthy habit. It’s undeniable that some things placed by the government are actually helpful, especially the age limits. They often state that being able to express themselves in any way possible should be considered. This could cause an uproar within the world population. If teens are getting what they want, then so should everyone, by all means lets legalise drugs and weapons and we’ll see what a great time everyone is having when families, schools and governments are effected as well as countries.
These people claim that smoking marijuana is harmful to the lungs and brain development of teenagers. Cigarettes have the same, if not greater, damaging effect on human lungs yet the government does not infringe upon Americans’ right to take such health risks. Although there have been no scientific study to validate that smoking marijuana damages brain development, a simple resolution would be to make the legal age for smoking and possessing marijuana in the mid 20’s when the brain is completely developed. The argument of the dangers of marijuana can also be made for the opposing side. Illegal and unregulated marijuanna posing far more dangers to people than if marijuana was regulated by the government.
Recently, there is a new invention that has become public interest from country’s leader to citizen due to the rise of one device that called e-cigarettes. E-cigarettes or Vape are electronic devices intended to deliver nicotine with flavorings, which up to 7700 different flavors and some other chemicals into vapor. The amount of users of this device has increased in the past couple of years, which contributed $6 billion to the economy in 2015 itself, this is so as it is often portrayed as a healthier substitute for the regular cigarettes though this statement has yet been proven true. The question is: should the government ban the use of e-cigarettes? In my opinion, government should ban the use of e-cigarettes because it is detrimental to health,
Smoking is a choice and no one is forcing that upon people. The public has been well warned about the risks of smoking; therefore, the people smoking are fully aware that their lives are at risk. Tobacco companies should not be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths because once people put the tobacco in their mouths, they are putting there own life at risk themselves, and because as individuals we have a choice on whether or not to smoke cigarette. It 's true that tobacco companies aren 't accountable for why people smoke. Nonetheless, every tobacco product has a warning label on it therefore it 's not the companies responsibility from smoking-related illnesses and deaths.
There is grey disgusting cancerous smoke through the air you and your loved ones breathe. I believe that smoking cigarettes in public places should be illegal for many reasons such as the health and safety dangers of others and even myself. Firstly those who believe that smoking should be banned say that cigarettes can affect smokers deeply in the long run. “Over 50,000 studies of the health effects of tobacco in dozens of countries have detailed its dangers.
Smoking does not set a good example for children, as most children that have parents/guardians who smoke, are more likely to smoke as well, since it shows them that it 's acceptable to do. It also affects the relationships people may have with family and friends, as most people do not want to be around someone who constantly smokes and smells like cigarettes. Not one of these is more crucial than the other, in the way that they all affect people 's family and
It affects the health of the human beings and also the environment. Despite having all these negative effects, tobacco is of great economic importance as it creates employment for the citizens. The negative effects of tobacco smoking supersede its positive contributions. Therefore, tobacco smoking should be banned. .
Smoking has been a long time habit round the world. However, in the past, smoking cigarette was very popular and known to be a cool recreational drug, and was widely accepted by the community across the world. Today smoking has been less widely accepted and more restricted because of the many health risks that are linked to smoking cigarette. These days, people are well educated and more knowledgeable about the health risks of smoking.
General Purpose: to persuade Specific Purpose: to persuade the audience of the importance of banning smoking in public places Thesis: Smoking should be banned in public places because it is harmful to non-smokers who visit public places. I. Introduction A. Attention-getter: How many of you been around people who are smoking in public places? Probably, most of us have at least noticed people smoking in CMU campus even it is a non-smoking campus. Secondhand smoke is really harmful to anyone who inhales it in.
Smoking should be banned in public places for many reason many people do not like the smell of smoke nor want the smell of the smoke to get into their clothes. Smoking also affects the environment. For an example if someone is outside smoking outside near a restaurant and a family wants to sit outside and eat it can affect the family that is eating also if they have kids with them. Usually people look for places where no smokers are so thats why smoking should be banned from all public places. Some people also would not like for there kids to get influenced by others people smoking or to imitate it.
Smoking has become a social habit nowadays. When people around are smoking, the person practically feel like he/she should be doing the same. And this is increasing day by day in our country. Smoking tribulates almost every organ of the body. It is the leading cause of more than 443,00 deaths each year.