ipl-logo

Essay On Canadian Government Vs American Government

961 Words4 Pages

Close neighbours, and both separated from the United Kingdom to be independent countries. Many would think that with such a similar history, both countries would be governed alike. The Canadian parliamentary system and the American congressional system are two very different models of government when looking deeper into the makeup, structure, and jobs each part of government plays. In this paper, I argue that the Canadian parliamentary system is advantaged and better suited compared to its American counterparts based on holding the government accountable to the constituents, the political stability of the country due to the multi-political party system, and its efficiency with such political parties.

The Canadian parliamentary system follows …show more content…

The House of Commons hosts the 338 elected officials of Canada. Each member of parliament(MP) must win a majority of the votes in the riding or constituency they run in to obtain a seat. Most of the time, candidates will affiliate with or are part of one of many political parties. The party that wins the most seats in the house will then have their leader become the Prime Minister of Canada(PM). The Senate on the other hand, houses 105 un-elected officials, who are appointed by the Governor General of Canada, the Queen’s representative(The queen is still the Head of State). These officials may serve until they are 75 years old. In addition to aiding in appointing the Senate, the Prime Minister is also responsible for appointing their cabinet. The members of the Prime Minister’s cabinet are selected from MPs, and are responsible for taking on different portfolio(s), proposing bills about their portfolio(s) and implementing policies related to their portfolio(s). The selection of proper MPs to fulfil each portfolio is vital to maintaining the House of Commons confidence, which leads to …show more content…

I believe that the Canadian system does a better job of representing its constituents. Firstly, it allows the people to hold the government accountable to what they elected them to do in the first place. The constituents are able to hold their representatives accountable due to the strong party system in place. As an MP is elected, they campaign on behalf of their party, following a platform the party believes. “People vote… for a party on the basis of its platform, which they expect the party and its members to follow.” (Lecomte, 2018). In turn for one’s vote, it is expected that the MP follows the platform they campaigned with. While in the American system, steering away from the party platform is normalised and many times endorsed by constituents. Lecomte believes “individual MPs have a responsibility to give voice to the wishes of their constituents while also remaining faithful to their own political and moral principles.” (Franks, 1987, p. 106 as cited by Lecomte, 2018). This shows that it is expected of MPs to uphold their political views, which are most likely to resemble the platform of their affiliated party but also uphold and voice the concerns of their constituents. Thus, it allows for people to hold their elected officials accountable without having to do much but put faith in the system that was built for such a

Show More
Related

  • Essay On Triple E Senate Reform

    1111 Words  | 5 Pages

    Looking at the political history of Canada, there has been quite a few times when provinces were unhappy with the divisions of powers between themselves and the federal government. In 1985 Alberta’s Select Special Committee proposed the idea of a Triple E Senate reform. They viewed parliament, especially Senate, as a way that they could bring their issues to the national forum and they could be taken care of. The provinces have been more interested in a more regionally represented parliament that would be more interested in aiding in regional issues. They believe that Senate should follow through with one of its major duties and instead of simply focusing on Ontario and Quebec due to their larger populations, should instead have representatives from each province to strengthen the federal government in its relations with its provinces and the total Canadian

    Read More

  • Key Social, Economic, And Political Issues That Led To The Rebellions Of 1837-1838

    567 Words  | 3 Pages

    The only elected position in the government was the Legislative Assembly. The other government positions were appointed by the governor. The Governor appointed the Lieutenant Governor's, one was in charge of Upper Canada, One was in charge of Lower Canada. They appointed the Legislative Council and the Executive Council. Eventually, responsible government was granted to Canada, first in Nova Scotia in January 1838, then, later in all of

    Read More

  • Overview Of The Obstruction Handbook By Sir John A. Macdonald

    1888 Words  | 8 Pages

    Canada’s constitution was created on, July 1, 1867, which established Canada’s bicameral parliamentary system consisting of the House of Commons and the Senate. The Founding Fathers of Confederation created the Senate as a complimentary chamber to the House of Commons, where its most important functions are to review legislation and act as a forum where the voices of the province’s regional interests can be heard. Sir John A. Macdonald made an interesting point that the Senate must never set itself in opposition against the understood wishes of the people (Forsey 2015). This statement by Sir John A. Macdonald is thought provoking because the Senate has faced controversy over whether its appointment process is affecting the Senate’s function

    Read More

  • The Three Branches

    1249 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Whips assure that the members of their party vote in accordance with the party’s best

    Read More

  • Essay On Canadian Senate Reform

    1425 Words  | 6 Pages

    Canadian Senate Reform The Senate, which consists of one hundred and five appointed members, was created to represent the rights and interests of Canadians in all regions. It is known as the superior house within Canada’s bipartisan parliamentary democracy (Joyal, 2003). There is no question that Canada is in fact, a democratic country and The Senate exists, in theory, to ensure the continuation of this. As democracy is frequently defined as “power vested in the people” (Stilborn, 1992), it is not uncommon for individuals to see the country’s democratic methods as a largely efficacious.

    Read More

  • How To Abolish The Senate In Canada Essay

    344 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, abolishing the Senate may not be the best for Canada in the end, so another argument is to reform the Senate. The best plan at the moment to reform the Senate is the Triple E plan, as it would make it so that the Senators are elected, each province is represented equally, making the Senate more effective. If we were to abolish the Senate the only way to do so would be by a constitutional amendment backed by at least seven provinces representing 50 per cent of the population, or one with unanimous provincial

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: We Should Keep The Senate In Canada

    875 Words  | 4 Pages

    All over Canada, Canadians have different views as for what should we do about the Senate .Yes, the Senate has some important qualities but what we do not need the Senate for today is one of its original purposes, to represent the interests of the provinces in the federal legislative policy process. For example, people like “Ralph Goodale, who fought hard for Saskatchewan’s interest around the Cabinet table for more than a dozen years. John Baird, the regional minister for Eastern Ontario today,”(Eugene Lang) is a current equivalent. The provincial interest is taken care of by regional ministers in a way that no senator or group of senators could hope to

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Monarchy In Canada

    564 Words  | 3 Pages

    The monarchy in Canada is a continuous debate among the politicians and individuals. This paper aims to present the advantages and disadvantages of the monarchy in Canada. This way will enable us to take a clear position. First, Canadian politics are known for their divisive attitudes, and it is very hard to get consensus on decisions. The Queen plays the role of reference for the Canadian politicians and their decisions.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Canada Senate

    1949 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Senate in Canada should be abolished Introduction: Canada senate is a part of legislation institution in Canada, which represents the interests of upper class people. Different from America, it is not produced by election but directly-nominated by the premier and appointed by governor. Senate, governor, and the House of Commons are like three legs of a tripod which constitute the congress and legislation system in Canada. Senate undertakes the responsibility of proposing expostulation to governor and cabinet, which acts the role of supervision and restriction. Senate played critical role when Canada established federal government in 1867, the diversity of senators warrants the smooth convey of popular will to governors and legislators coming from different ethnic group and social status.

    Read More

  • Pierre Trudeau Federalism

    1515 Words  | 7 Pages

    Institutional and historical analysis often portray the motives of governments, especially in the cases of Quebec separatism and Aboriginal mistreatment. History describes attempts at compromise to rectify the problems by altering political institutions to provide more autonomy to the provinces, witness in various accords and the methods described previously. However, in regards to Aboriginals a historical relationship of exploitation and eradication sheds on the systemic issues that Aboriginals cope with and the institutions that caused them. As scholars of Canadian politics, it is important to consider historical and institutional analyses when looking at any issue, as it reveals the underlying motives of actors in regards to the cleavages that comprise a state.

    Read More

  • Essay On Why Canada Should Remain A Constitutional Monarchy

    864 Words  | 4 Pages

    As the monarchy has existed in Canada for a long time, it is undeniable that even that has been part of many people’s identity and getting rid of this is the same as getting rid of a part of someone’s identity. During the process of removing the monarchy it is not a surprise that Canadians who support the monarchy would even protest so that the monarchy will not get abolished which would be chaotic. On the other hand, although many Canadians do not favour the monarchy, they do not have any protest going on at the moment which shows that changing the type of Canada’s government is not a top priority for many Canadians so it is better to just leave Canada's current government as it is. There are many polls conducted by many companies and there is a survey which majority of its respondents believed that the Constitutional Monarchy is indeed part and define Canadians in different aspects: “A majority (55%) agrees…that the constitutional monarchy helps to define Canadian identity and should continue to be our form of government, unchanged from 2021” (“Canadians Conflicted on Future Role of Monarchy,” 2022). This quote helps support the idea of the monarchy as being part of many Canadians’ identity and culture and abolishing it for no strong reason is more of a loss not only to Canada but to its people as well.

    Read More

  • Essay On Canadian Constitution Vs Us Constitution

    521 Words  | 3 Pages

    In addition to the rights it already has, the Canadian Charter also has a number of certain group rights. These rights include linguistic and cultural rights for the French Canadian part of the Canadian populations in places of Quebec and New Brunswick, some other rights that are included as well are rights for aboriginal groups. The concept of rights in this group of rights doesn’t really have any recognition to US law where it got them from. Unlike The U.S constitution, the Canadian constitution gives most of the power to its Queen, which gives her more power of everything, while the U.S divides the power as to not give anyone too much authority over some things. While Canada does have a distribution of legislative power, it's not as much of a distribution like the U.S constitution has since Canada has a queen.

    Read More

  • Mackenzie King And Sir John A. Macdonald's Analysis

    1574 Words  | 7 Pages

    For a long time the debates had been going about how was the better prime minister of Canada. On the the top of most lists of best prime ministers are Mackenzie King and Sir John A. Macdonald. For example, according to the Expert Survey that was made in 2013 “Laurier came first, Macdonald second, and King third, but the difference in their overall scores was negligible”. Both prime ministers had a strong vision of the country that helped shaped Canada to become the country it is today(in 2015). Thesis: Sir John A.Macdonald was one of the founding fathers, but William Lyon Mackenzie King had to lead the country through the part of Depression and WWII, and they both have made different positive contributions to Canada and are highly respected

    Read More

  • Majority Rule Advantages And Disadvantages

    1312 Words  | 6 Pages

    "Candidate with the highest number of the vote wins the right to represent the particular seat in the House of Commons", according to CBC news. There are some limitations regarding this method. First of all, it could possibly happen that candidate with less than half vote wins, which means it only reaches minority people's desired outcome. In addition to the tactical voting, the two-party system could be a serious problem. Since only the first matters, candidates with the low possibility to win may exist the election.

    Read More

  • The Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Parliamentary Government

    944 Words  | 4 Pages

    Secondly, the parliamentary executives, the cabinet minister and the Prime Minister, share responsibilities. Therefore, the parliament is “jointly responsible for the actions of the government…primus inter pares (first among equals)”. (Haywood, 2007, p. 95) Lastly, a typical feature of the parliamentary system is that the offices of the Head of State and the Head of the Government remain separate from each other. Union is a key feature of the parliamentary governments worldwide.

    Read More

More about Essay On Canadian Government Vs American Government

Open Document