“Sinned against or dangerous sinner?” In the book A Gathering of Days, Catherine struggles to decide if the slave is worth her sacrifice. Everyone agrees that Catherine did help the slave. Some people, however, believe she should help the phantom. While others believe she should not. Catherine should help the stranger in the forest for three reasons: Catherine would save his life, she thought slavery was cruel, harsh, and maleficent, and he had become her responsibility. The first reason Catherine should help the stranger is because she could save his life. New Hampshire winters are harsh and the slave had no house to call his own. Catherine was warm by the fire in her home, but the slave was in the freezing forest and would die if she did not act soon. The slave was probably hungry and needed food. The slave needed supplies and only Catherine could save him. The second reason she should help the …show more content…
Catherine and Asa were the ones who found the footprints. The slave stole her book and communicated with her. Catherine could not stop thinking about the slave saying, “I am so mindful of the stranger.” Because it was her responsibility, no one else would help the slave. Some people say Catherine should not help the slave. She had to defy the people in authority over her. While debating slavery with his brother, her father said he believed you should turn any runaway slaves into the authorities. It was against the law to help a slave. Catherine had to steal to give the slave provisions. This is inadequate because saving a life is more important than obedience. In addition, people say she should not help the slave because he was a criminal. He stole her book, stole some pies, and was opposing the peace. This is inadequate because he was only stealing for his basic needs. Also if she helped him, he would leave and stop stealing from
who she was very close to. She explains that her father taught her and her brothers free will and to feel like they were human beings, although it was very dangerous for a slave. The more a slave possessed the notion of their own free will, the more likely they were to be disobedient, run away and be of no use to their owner. Slaves were supposed to think that they were less than human so that the masters not only had physical control over them but psychological control as well.
“As a woman, her choices in regard to slavery were certainly limited, for she herself owned no slave property to free. But even her attitudes seem to reveal more of uncertainty and ambivalence than of the kind of implacable opposition abolitionism implies” (Faust). Chesnut felt bad for what the slaves had to go through, but she certainly was not an abolitionist. She showed sympathy for slaves, and she often doubted the practice of slavery too. She was not completely against slavery, but she did not promote it herself.
The Marshals surrounded the house the family was holed up in. Margaret Garner faced a choice to either let herself and her children be taken back into slavery, or not. When the Marshals broke into the house, they discovered that Margaret had slit her own daughters throat and was on her way to killing her other two sons, and eventually, herself. That was what she decided to do rather than go back to the living hell that slavery was. Slavery proponents in the south saw her as subhuman, willing to murder her own offspring, but abolitionists in the north saw it as a mother trying to save her children from enduring slavery, especially her daughter. Because the Fugitive Slave Act still considered escaped slaves in the free north, Margaret was only considered property and could not be tried for murder.
Catherine was an excellent horsewoman, greatly skilled in riding horseback. In addition to her equestrian talents, she was also very familiar with the
That is why she is very important and also why she will be on the 20 dollar
It was extremely cold in Boston around that time, and Curtis did not have the materials to survive. The second reason Catherine should have
Her account is also pretty selfish, as she thinks of no one but herself. However, by the second quote, it is obvious that Catherine has changed. She compares herself to the Jews that stopped by her manor, meaning that she is also thinking of others. By the end of Catherine’s narration of her year, she has grown more thoughtful,
How is Catherine unique? In the book, Rules by Cynthia Lord, Catherine was the main character who faced many challenges throughout the book. She has a mom who does not really understand her problems. Her dad does not really play a big role in the story. These challenges often include his little brother, David, messing up things.
But in reality she knew that she did not have an option because issue was blame on her just for being the slave. Sarah Good became another victim in court that risk their good name to save their own life. The
One of the reasons slavery was worse for women was the sexual exploitation that they were put through. Men saw slaves as their own property and they took great advantage of their power over them. They believed that they had both power over her actions and her body. Starting at very young ages some women were harassed by their masters for sex, and obeyed because of the terrible consequences of denying them. Masters were allowed to rape their slaves and didn’t get into any trouble for doing so.
He did not help them because he does not truly care about them. He just wanted to be remembered as a good person. Not a evil robber baron which he truly was. He would also use his money to hide bad things that he did. He would use it was a kind of distraction or a justification for what he did.
The family pair struggles to maintain enough food for themselves, but despite that the boy still tries to give up his food in order to help others. Not only did he insist in helping a man as rude as Ely, but wanted to help the lost kid on the road. “We could get him and take him with us…. I’d give that little boy half of my food”( McCarthy 86). This displays the naturally generous and unselfish characteristics of the boy.
Or does she simply want to get rid of her shop of his troublesome presence. ”(41) The motive for why this woman fed the man is debatable but in the end the question is why. Why did the woman feed the man? Maybe it was not even either one of those motives.
A man is more likely to maintain their composure over a woman in a crisis because they are more capable and secure. Or are they? A widely held belief that is anchored to fit the oversimplified image of what a group of people or one individual person or object is- or should be- is called a stereotype. In the story The Dinner Party by Mona Gardner, a controversial conversation arose between a young girl and a highly-respected colonel in the 1940s, in India. The guests at the elegant dinner party, were comprised of many government officials and their wives.
At the beginning of the novel, Catherine is described as a wild and rebellious child. However, that changes after her stay with the Linton’s. When she returns from her stay her “manners were much improved,” and “instead of a wild, hatless little savage jumping into the house…there lighted from a handsome black pony a very dignified person, with brown ringlets falling from the cover of a feathered beaver, and a long cloth habit which she was obliged to hold up with both hands that she might sail in” (46). Catherine was tempted by the way of life the Linton’s lived and, to fit in, has concealed her wild and rebellious nature. She confides in her housekeeper that she loves Heathcliff, but can’t marry him because it would “degrade” her (71).