We have to consider all the aspects of the child soldier cases and not deal with them in a binary way. “The aim should not be punishment of child soldiers but rehabilitation. There are alternatives that achieve this aim better than prosecution.” (Child Soldiers, Prosecution, 11). All child soldier, irrespective of their guilt, need to be rehabilitated and reintegrated into society. Child soldiers should still be prosecuted, but without black-and-white thinking.
Physical, sexual, and psychological cruelty are effects of child abuse. Physical abuse is a painful, devastating event that occurs on a daily basis. According to the government, physical abuse is “when someone uses a part of their body or an object to control a person’s actions.” “ There are many forms of physical force, such as, hitting, strangling, slapping, beating, and kicking.Other types of harm include objects or weapons to injure the child. Most of the time, physical abuse goes undetected because it is hard to point out. Children often get hurt and parents or other adults often make up excuses of what
Miranda cautions are a high point of dispute in the law enforcement scene. There are many misunderstandings as to when "Miranda" applies. First, I explain about Miranda rights to their family because it’s important to know these basics. If we aren’t in police care then we don’t have to give them Miranda warnings. We mention all the matter in front of boy’s family and asked the officer that when police officers question a suspect in custody without first giving the Miranda warning, any statement or confession made is supposed to be instinctive, and cannot be used against the suspicious in any criminal case.
An important issue that must be examined in accordance with the abolition of family is the space for friendship. If, by demolishing the nuclear family, a larger communal family is created, citizens cannot reap the benefits of friendship. Additionally, treating everyone as family member is essentially making nobody a part of a family. When eliminating the inherent small size and intimate nature of a family, there is not a great deal of other conditions in place to continue considering the relationships familial. More specifically, Socrates states, "All these women are to belong to all these men
“You might hear some ugly talk about it at school, but do one thing for me just hold your head high and keep those fists down. Try fighting with your head for a change.” In other words Atticus, Scout’s father is telling her not to worry or care what people think but to not use violence to fight back to use her head and ignore them to keep her head high. Scout learns that instead of making her life hard and hurtful listening to people insult her father, to just ignore the people’s opinion. The motif in the chapter it shows us that Scout doesn’t need her fists to defend her family. In the book To Kill a Mockingbird, Lee used conflict, character, and motif to convey the theme of people often defend their family’s honor, through violence.
An oblivious father speaks lowly of his daughter arguing that she “[d]oesn't know because she’s just a child…she’ll get over it” (Prom Night n.pag.). Strong opinions are not something people can simply “get over”; nor should they want to. Not only are children supposed to strive to obtain good morals, but all people should. The authority to change another’s viewpoint derives from a solid set of beliefs. However, to acquire a sense of morality in these beliefs, one must thoroughly consider all angles of a situation to grasp a hold of empathy.
Child abuse is now spreading increasingly day by day all over the world and can be seen in every group whether it is ethnic or cultural group. Child maltreatment includes physical abuse, sexual abuse, neglect and psychological abuse. Abuse is addition of any kind of trouble in someone’s life. It can be emotional or verbal. Child abuse is a serious issue these days and has caused severe effects in lives of children.
Family is one of the strongest socializing agents in an individual’s life and is tasked with teaching acceptable behavior, delaying gratification and respecting the rights of others. However, it is also possible for the family to teach aggressive behavior, which manifests into the environment when their children attempt to integrate into society. Given this realization, it can be assumed that family structure is directly linked to the development of delinquent and criminal tendencies. Therefore, when attempting to approach the issue of juvenile delinquency and reform, the root causes should be considered and the family is about as close as we could get. What is responsible for the failure of a family to raise socially productive, non-violent children?
It's just curiosity. But parents telling them is not a good idea. Some parents assume that because the child has experienced many of the same events the parent has in that household the child probably knows why the parents had to divorce. Even so, the parent has to find a way to heal the scar that the child has instead of leaving it as it is just because the parents experienced the same thing. Other parents want to protect their children from experiencing or even knowing about unhappy or unpleasant events so they decide to tell them very little about the actual reasons for the divorce.
There is a real threat to the victim’s future being brought by self-defeating behaviour which is subtle and usually hard to notice. The effects of social exclusion should be explained to children early and in simple terms, so that they would understand the consequences and not behave in that manner. If children are brought up to condemn ostracising behaviour, they would grow up with the same mindset which would eliminate social exclusion between adults at work. It could even increase productivity of companies if people started talking about what they dislike instead of ostracizing the