Essay On Circumstantial Evidence
The most essential part of our judicial system is that it is based on the presumption that the accused is innocent unless proven guilty beyond doubt. Also it is better that ten guilty are held free than one innocent being falsely implicated in a case. Thus the burden of proof in a criminal case is very high. Circumstantial evidence is basically the evidence which is furnished not by direct testimony of an eye witness to the fact to be proved, but by relying on the fact or other auxiliary facts which can be relied upon as incompatible with any result other than truth of principal fact. Circumstantial evidence can be fully apprehended if it is compared in context of direct evidence. It is a type of evidence which is simply direct evidence applied indirectly. The whole discussion brings us back to the most fundamental question i.e. whether the circumstantial evidence can be used as sole basis of conviction or not. The fact cannot be denied that circumstantial evidence plays a pivotal role in a criminal case. It has helped the courts in administration of justice in so many landmark cases which heavily relied on circumstantial evidence. Generally …show more content…
The law is well settled that each and every incriminating circumstance is required to be clearly established with supporting evidences and also the chain of events should be complete in such a manner that the only conclusion which could be drawn is guilt of the accused and no other hypothesis against the guilt is possible. The Supreme court also didn’t hesitate in giving death sentence to the murderer only because the case relied on circumstantial evidence. The general rule is that it is admissible in a court of law but they are required to be cautious when a case solely relies on circumstantial evidence. All the facts should be closely examined and it must be looked at
Forensic Evidence: Azaria Chamberlain By Laura Hitler
1790 Words | 8 PagesFor starters pieces of evidence that strongly pulled together the defence’s case were viewed with doubt and disbelief from the prosecution but
Appeal Of The Queen V. Danny Lalumiere Case
1100 Words | 5 PagesThere is a wide range of ways to interpret a case before arriving at the final verdict. In most situations, the best way is to prove the guilt of an accused. The facts presented before the court are vital to prove that a criminal act occurred. A determination should be made in a case to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. At times it is the full discretion of the judge to make a decision, which can deviate from the facts of the case.
Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Brady V. Bobti
596 Words | 3 PagesIntroduction: The United States Supreme Court cases of Brady v. Maryland, Giglio v. United States, and United States v. Agurs all deal with the prosecution's obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. These cases establish that prosecutors have a constitutional duty to disclose all evidence favorable to the accused. Failure to disclose this information violates due process and can result in a new trial or acquittal.
Smell Of Death: The Casey Anthony Trial
593 Words | 3 PagesThe smell in the trunk of the car was tested and contained a large amount of chloroform and key compounds of human decomposition. Evidence is evidence but not all evidence is good, but the “smell of death” that was in the trunk could have been used as good evidence to the case. Why? Because they did not have any other good evidence to prove that she killed her daughter, but that one piece of evidence alone could have convicted her of murdering her daughter.
Wayne Williams Fiber Evidence Essay
629 Words | 3 PagesThe fiber evidence presented in this case was so overwhelming and simply was the driving force leading to Wayne Williams conviction. I do not believe the prosecution would have been able to obtain the same results without it. The credibility of the FBI forensics investigators and their reputable crime lab made for excellent testimony concerning the fiber evidence at trail, which the defense was simply ill prepared to counter attack its merits (The Atlanta, n.d.). Other evidence was presented in this case, and much of this evidence while certainly impactful on the case and to members of the jury, this evidence alone without the fiber evidence would surely not have held up to the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.
Why Do People Convicted When They Only Have Circumstantial Evidence
606 Words | 3 PagesWhy are people always convicted on something they only have circumstantial evidence on? I believe that there is many more ways for a jury to find out if a person is guilty or not and circumstantial evidence is one of the main things they use. Most of the time people get blamed for something they didn’t do and they don’t even have all the evidence to prove that one is guilty. So then they end up going to jail for a crime they did not commit. I don’t believe a person should be convicted of a crime based only on circumstantial evidence because I don’t think it’s fair for the victim.
What Are The Similarities Between O. J. Simpson And Lizzie Borden
945 Words | 4 PagesThe cases of O.J. Simpson and Lizzie Borden are two court cases in American history that are 100 years apart, conversely are very parallel. On both occasions the verdict comes to be the same: not guilty. Circumstantial evidence, which is defined as evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion or fact, was heavily utilized in the process of prosecuting both subjects. Both Orenthal James Simpson and Lizzie Borden should be found guilty of murder due to the continuous number of things that prove their guilt.
Argumentative Essay: The Murder Of Mr. Stephens
548 Words | 3 PagesLadies and gentlemen of the jury, you are here because one person in this courtroom decided to take law into her own hands. The defendant, Mrs. Dominique Stephens, murdered the man that she vowed to love. This sole act by the defendant is violation of all morals and her husband’s right to live. Afterwards, she even felt guilty about this violation of justice and called the cops on herself, and she later signed a written statement stating that she is guilty of the murder of Mr. Donovan Stephens. Then the defendant later recanted this statement and said that she only killed Mr. Stephens in self defense.
James Richardson's Innocence
927 Words | 4 PagesThis shows that evidence is an important role in pleading someone guilty. When you convict someone of a crime, make sure you know the evidence and information on the case before sentencing
Criminally Responsible Law
1035 Words | 5 Pages(Miladinovic, Z., & Lukassen, J., 2015, February 25) The outcome of a just trial and its verdict, is based on proof of evidence, which ensures what 's best for the
The CSI Effect
738 Words | 3 PagesIn the article “ The CSI Effect: TV Crime Dramas’ Impact on Real Life Cases” by Madeline Anderson states “ People who regularly view such shows can come away with specific ideas about the reliability and integrity of forensic evidence.” This represents that these shows give the wrong impression to the viewers on forensic evidence. Anderson as well says “ These ideas may lead jurors to except to see more forensic evidence in trials or to weigh such evidence more heavily than they would otherwise.” This shows that everything in the TV shows related the crime dramas, evidence wise there is a limit for how much the evidence can do in the actually case or in the court. Anderson states that “ It can also create false sense of confidence when it comes to understanding such evidence..”
Comparing The Salem Witch Trials And The American Criminal Justice System
478 Words | 2 PagesToday, modern standards require the burden of proof be brought forth by the plaintiff, or prosecution in criminal cases. This means that the accused no longer has to prove they did not commit the crime, but the prosecution has to prove that all the evidence proves the accused did in fact commit the crime in question. Circumstantial evidence is not enough, but physical evidence, or forensic evidence is now required in modern courts for a conviction. Additionally, the modern standard when considering evidence, and for conviction is “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Eyewitness Evidence
127 Words | 1 PagesFinally, to significantly reduce eyewitness error, the criminal justice system must view eyewitness evidence as a type of trace evidence.45 Like other types of trace evidence, such as fingerprints, DNA, and firearm patterns, eyewitness evidence has a physiological basis (i.e., biochemical changes in the eyewitness’s brain).46 Consequently, the accuracy of eyewitness testimony, like other types of trace evidence, depends in large part on the use of proper scientific procedures in collecting and preserving it. In short, before admitting eyewitness evidence, a judge should always first determine if valid scientific procedures were followed in producing it. If they were not followed, this failure should generally weigh heavily against admitting
Evidence In 12 Angry Men
488 Words | 2 PagesAnother piece of evidence is a woman who swears to have seen the young man stabbed the father through the last two windows of the train. The evidence says that she was asleep and when she woke up and turned to the window through the last two windows of the train, she was able to see how the young man stabbed his father. The only problem with this argument is that the woman wore bifocal glasses and nobody usually sleeps with glasses so it would be very difficult that without their lenses of such magnitude could see what actually
Cardinal Principles Essay
1076 Words | 5 PagesThe prosecution bears the legal burden to prove the guilt of defendant beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases whereby the defendant bears the evidential burden
More about Essay On Circumstantial Evidence
Forensic Evidence: Azaria Chamberlain By Laura Hitler
1790 Words | 8 PagesAppeal Of The Queen V. Danny Lalumiere Case
1100 Words | 5 PagesSummary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Brady V. Bobti
596 Words | 3 PagesSmell Of Death: The Casey Anthony Trial
593 Words | 3 PagesWayne Williams Fiber Evidence Essay
629 Words | 3 PagesWhy Do People Convicted When They Only Have Circumstantial Evidence
606 Words | 3 PagesWhat Are The Similarities Between O. J. Simpson And Lizzie Borden
945 Words | 4 PagesArgumentative Essay: The Murder Of Mr. Stephens
548 Words | 3 PagesJames Richardson's Innocence
927 Words | 4 PagesCriminally Responsible Law
1035 Words | 5 PagesThe CSI Effect
738 Words | 3 PagesComparing The Salem Witch Trials And The American Criminal Justice System
478 Words | 2 PagesEyewitness Evidence
127 Words | 1 PagesEvidence In 12 Angry Men
488 Words | 2 PagesCardinal Principles Essay
1076 Words | 5 Pages