it, to protect society from enemies because liberty must be defended with its very antithesis: coercion and military force. Concurrently, control mechanisms need to be devised so that the military does not threaten civil society itself. Equally, these mechanisms if allowed unbridled power, acquire an insidious purpose and weaken the military instrument so as to defeat the very raison d’etre for is creation. It makes little sense to painstakingly and assiduously build a military organization and combat ethic in the first place and then proceed to trample its very institutional strengths with layers and layers of bureaucracy. 12. In yet another travesty of Feaver’s worker-shirker framework, the shirker in the Indian context may not be the usual …show more content…
What is being witnessed today, however, is precisely the opposite - the generalist tenor in the Indian MoD is increasing exponentially - if the acquisition processes are not functioning well, put in place a DG Acquisitions from the Indian Administrative Service (IAS); if there is trouble with Ex - Servicemen Welfare a Secretary level post for the IAS is created; to optimize management of ministerial time addition of a Joint Secretary level officer from the IAS takes place. For every trouble in the MoD, the trouble shooting business is passed onto the bureaucrats, who have limited or no knowledge of defence, The swaddle grows in step with the problems even as outcomes continue to elude the decision-makers in India. Contrast this with the degree of crosspollination in the acquisition processes in the British MoD for instance – see how the armed forces drive processes as part of both: capability definition processes and delivery organisations. Deputy Chief of Defence Staff Capability is responsible for capability definition, spelling out the customer requirement and budget control of the agreed equipment plan and the head of the Defence Equipment Support (DES) is responsible to translate the customer requirement into a viable arms and equipment supply. The two appointments together help in strengthening the customer - supplier relationship in the UK MOD. The heads of both the arms, capability definition and equipment supply - DCDS Capability who lays down aspirational objectives and DES who trades off practical concerns are three star officers from the three services. And who is the overseer of acquisition processes? A professor from Cambridge, Bernard Gray, who first drafted a widely acclaimed report
When our country’s founding fathers first came together, they disagreed on many things. However, there was one thing they all agreed on. They had to protect against tyranny. Tyranny is when a person or a group of people, deny rights to another group of people. For examples, Britain taxed the colonies without their representation, which took away some key unalienable rights, which are rights that everyone is entitled to.
And what the Supreme Court ruled in the landmark court case of Schenck v. the United States was reasonable and true. In the “Background Essay”, the authors mention John Locke and his philosophy the Social Contract. “...we contract to leave the ‘natural state’ and we give up certain natural rights in order to live in a safe, civil society.” That is Locke’s belief, and that is the most basic reason why restrictions are needed while countries are at war.
Montesquieu’s The Spirit of Laws suggests, “The armies with which it is entrusted should consist of the people, the legislative power should have a right to disband them as soon as it pleased.” Therefore, the Congress, the people’s government, has the power to create and disband a Standing Army if necessary. We must first secure the people’s liberty from internal
That, in turn, preserves the liberty of the people from overbearing
The author believes that a nation’s ruler should be held to certain laws. When it comes to a President though, he fells that they can use the military however they want to benefit themselves. The President would be able to break any rule in office if he would ever to be in trouble, since he would have the military there to back him up. The Author would rather have a King who has to follow guidelines, just like the common people, though not the same rules. A King doesn’t truly control the army, and the author is afraid of what would happen with a national republic and what the consequences
The Primary objective of all leaders should be to control citizens. A society that allows authority to be challenged will never succeed. This source depicts an authoritarian or totalitarian view of what a governing body should look like. The author suggests that the primary objective of government should be the “control of the citizens”, and therefore that the individuals should entirely obey said government.
In 1783, the Treaty of Paris was signed and America was declared it’s own nation after years of war. America was fighting for it’s freedom because they had a tyrant ruler, King George III, who didn’t give them their rights. According to James Madison, a tyrant is one, few, or many people who abuse their given power. Originally, the framers made a weak national government, the Articles of Confederation, because they were afraid of a tyrant controlling them again. The Articles didn’t have an executive leader, or court system for the states.
In political science, states have a legal monopoly on violence within their sovereignty; in reality, this means a Government’s domestic policing powers are largely unconstrained, as it can justly, or unjustly, coerce, imprison, and murder in the name of the public. Yet in modern America, and most of the western world, constitutional checks and balances have constrained state interference; these limits specifically curtail a state’s policing power by protecting the individual’s autonomy from political tyranny and partiality. These so-called ‘natural rights’, liberties, or protections originated from the Enlightenment, and established the importance of individuals in relation to their societies and states. Modernity thinkers such as Tocqueville
James Madison stated that war is detrimental to the existence of freedom in society. His claims in “Political Observations” exemplify his respect for the influence of public thought. If all sides of an issue are shown to the public the truth eventually will come out. Some of the reasons why he classified war as the most dreaded enemy to public liberty include war is the guardian of armies, debts, and taxes, war disrupts the balance of the Executive and Legislative branches, and countries would have difficulty maintaining freedom with constant warfare. Madison alleged that war was the keeper of armies, debts, and taxes.
The U.S 's first government was created on September 17, 1787 when the US Constitution was signed. This event brought together all 13 states by a unanimous vote. With this, our new government was formed, but now that we have this new system and much more freedom, what exactly is the purpose of our government? Is it to run our businesses? make treaties? or just to say that we have one?
“Government is necessary to ensure the proper use of force... The purpose of government is to protect the individual rights of its citizens” (importanceofphilosophy.com). And, just exactly what are our individual rights? “The freedom to act, work, think and behave without retribution bestowed upon members of an organization through legal, regulatory and societal standards” (businessdictionary.com). In other words, the government was only created as a means to protect our individual rights and ensure that we aren’t judged and are free to do as we choose as long as we do not interfere with the individual rights of others.
The Constitution is the greatest document to teach “the question of how free and equal citizens check and channel power both to protect themselves from domination by one another and to secure their mutual protection from external forces that might seek their domination” (Allen 9). To do this, the Constitution created the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances so that each branch of government does not have domination over the other. Each branch of government has a specific area of responsibility and was made to not have too much power over the others, to keep an unbiased system of
Without the concern of defense or sell protection,individuals are able to live in security. Jefferson offers the purpose of government. It exists to acid in the well-being of both the nations and it citizen. Government exists to control the lives of citizens. A government must establish
“That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (Jefferson, 1776/2014, para. 2). Authority should not reside over individuals, but with them. A heart cannot run a body alone. Likewise, a government does not operate a nation by itself. Individuals help maintain the justice of authority.
These reasons will prevent anarchy because one has a conscience to determine which laws to follow and which ones do not; therefore, one shows loyalty to the authority of law and also loyalty to one’s