Waylon Kinder
Professor Durden
College Comp 2
NIL Deals For You and Me
The issue of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights for college athletes has been a topic of discussion for several years. The NCAA had long prohibited college athletes from profiting from their NIL rights, claiming that it was essential to maintaining the amateurism ideal of college sports. However, in 2021, the NCAA changed its stance and announced that college athletes could now earn money from their NIL rights. This decision has sparked a debate among stakeholders, with some arguing that NIL deals would provide much-needed financial support for college athletes, while others contend that such arrangements would undermine the amateurism ideal of college sports.
One
…show more content…
The NCAA's focus on revenue generation has led to an emphasis on high-profile sports like football and basketball, leaving athletes in other sports with even fewer resources and support. This has resulted in a system in which athletes are often forced to sacrifice their health and wellbeing in order to meet the demands of their sport.
Another aspect of the exploitation of college athletes is the control that universities and the NCAA have over their lives. Athletes are subject to strict regulations regarding their behavior and must adhere to strict schedules and routines. This can limit their ability to pursue other interests or career opportunities outside of their sport, and can also restrict their ability to speak out on issues that are important to them.
The recent decision by the NCAA to allow college athletes to profit from their NIL rights is a step towards addressing the issue of exploitation. By allowing athletes to benefit from their own likeness and image, the NCAA is acknowledging the value that athletes bring to the world of college sports. However, it is important to monitor the implementation of NIL deals to ensure that they do not exacerbate existing inequalities or compromise the educational mission of college sports.
II. The Benefits of NIL
…show more content…
The Role of Universities and the NCAA in Implementing NIL Deals
The recent decision by the NCAA to allow college athletes to profit from their NIL rights places a significant burden on universities and the NCAA to implement and regulate NIL deals in a fair and equitable manner. This section will examine the role of universities and the NCAA in implementing NIL deals, including the challenges they face in balancing the interests of athletes, educational institutions, and commercial partners.
One challenge universities face is ensuring that NIL deals do not interfere with the educational mission of college sports. Universities must strike a delicate balance between allowing athletes to profit from their NIL rights while also ensuring that their academic and athletic pursuits remain a top priority. This can be particularly challenging for revenue-generating sports like football and basketball, where athletes may be under greater pressure to prioritize their commercial interests over their academic
NCAA athletes took the NCAA to court. Ed O’Bannon, a former NCAA athlete, led the charge for the student athletes. O’Bannon argued that the athletes are being taken advantage of because the schools make millions off of the players’ likeness, meaning the schools make money on selling a jersey, or bobble head of the players and the players deserve some of that money and it should be put into a trust fund for the player. Judge Claudia Wilkin decided the O’Bannon case and gave the athletes everything they wanted in 2014, but in a court of repeals the ruling was reversed and the college just had to pay for the full cost of attendance at the university and did not have to pay for the trust of each athlete (Nocera). This was a small step for college
The author suggests that because not all college athletes are on scholarship, many of them still have to be employed to be able to pay for their college. Therefore, the author argues that while playing a collegiate sport, a full time job in itself, many athletes have to work another job on top of it. The article suggests that with compensation, this problem, along with many other problems including ending corruption and increasing motivation to play, can be
Montrez Brown Mr. Fowler Honors English May 7, 2023 Pros and Cons of NIL Deals College athletes have been a topic of debate for a long time now, especially in the context of brand deals and endorsements. With recent developments of Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) policies college athletes can now earn money from brand endorsement deals, benefits and negatives from the (NIL) deals. The implementation of (NIL) deals for college athletes is a crucial step towards providing them with the rights and opportunities they deserve, as it allows them to monetize the talent while fostering a more equitable and sustainable college sports industry (Bilas). This essay will explore the benefits and negative aspects of (NIL) deals for college athletes and brands. BENEFITS OF NIL DEALS FOR COLLEGE ATHLETES
The organization was founded to protect student athletes but how did the NCAA go from being an agreement to promote safety standards so as to prevent death on the field, to a multi-million dollar enterprise that seems most concerned with ensuring that "student-athletes" do not receive any compensation for their in-demand talents? 1) For example Heisman trophy winner Johnny Manziel generated $37 million worth of exposure for Texas A&M last season, and in the meantime Manziel didn’t get a single penny from the revenue produced by him. V. Hardships of being a student athlete A. After being recruited to play college sports this is where athletes will hear the terms “continuing eligibility” and “progress toward degree” which means that student-athletes need to stay on track in order to maintain progress toward a baccalaureate or equivalent degree to stay eligible to at the NCAA level. 1)
Fast forward to June 2021, the NCAA saw a need for change again. This time around they approve the Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) policy for student athletes. The NIL policy allows for NCAA D1, D2, and D3 student-athletes to be compensated for their NIL (ncsasports.org,
College sports are a multibillion-dollar industry that brings millions of fans in to watch their favorite teams or athletes play. Collegiate sports have always played a significant role in the U.S., and the debate as to whether college athletes should be paid or not has been ongoing for years. While many people believe that athletes should be paid for their hard work, as well as the significant amount of money they bring into the schools, many people also believe that they should not be paid. Although college athletes work hard, paying college athletes could lead to many negative consequences in the sport such as budget cuts in smaller income sports, athletes only playing for the money, and takes away the difference between amateur and professional athletes. Paying college athletes could lead to budget cuts in other sports or activities that don’t bring in as much money.
Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.
Although athletes draw large attention to schools, the previous system scams athletes of their hard work, creating an even
Athletes work hard around the clock to excel in their sport in the hopes of receiving a scholarship. However, many of these athletes pay the price with the extreme demands they place on themselves. College athletes are beginning to push to receive financial compensation from the NCAA because of their efforts. While the NCAA argues against it, student-athletes at the collegiate level should receive compensation because playing a D1 sport requires immense amounts of time, athletes are constantly taken advantage of by the NCAA, and scholarships alone are not sufficient to support the athletes. Playing a sport in college undoubtedly requires substantial time and effort that could have been better spent doing schoolwork.
It has been argued that college athletes should not be paid for their time and effort in competition. People have the idea that academics should take priority over sports. Numerous people believe that financial resources would be better served by facilitating more kids' education rather than investing in sports. There is some truth to the claim that college athletes are not all competing on a fair playing field. Even though they may not possess the same talent as their teammates, certain college athletes receive extensive recruitment.
This shows how cruel and greedy colleges are to the people making the money for them. Another reality is that college athletics generate billions of dollars every year, and everyone wants a piece of the action. Everyone, that is, except the players.” To conclude, this shows why college athletes should get just a little portion of the money they make for the colleges because it will affect how they play in a very positive
The first reason high school athletes shouldn’t be allowed to benefit from NIL deals in high school and college is because of too much pressure. For evidence, the article “Could NIL dollars flow down to Michigan high school athletes?” by Hugh Bernreuter states “Adding the pressure of NL compensation isn’t fair to the student. They
Athletes might want extra cash for many reasons. But the big idea is that the money they earn from NIL contracts can help them with whatever they need. Despite how little the amount of money athletes earn from their NIL contracts, “they may go a very long way for these student-athletes” and help them with certain payments (Whateley 2). High school and college athletes need this money from name, image, and likeness contracts to provide for themselves and their families. Student-athletes need money for school and other school-related expenses.
The Ongoing Debate In 2019, the NCAA pulled in around 1.2 billion dollars in revenue, and none of that went to the players. However, there is a new option for collegiate athletes: NIL deals. As more collegiate players take advantage of the newly available NIL (name, image and likeness) deals, more people are calling for the removal of all NCAA bans on paying college athletes. Various people across the country have been debating over athletes getting paid by their colleges for decades, and with NIL deals being approved, the debate is currently raging.
The fight for payment of college athletes has not been quick one as more and more issues keep popping up. The NCAA has never allowed payment of its athletes, but small steps towards the overall goal has questioned the NCAA’s past. Its’ decisions has stayed constant since its founding in 1906. The first issue in this decision would not occur until 1952 when the NCAA ruled to give The University of Kentucky the ‘death penalty’ for paying their athletes. This ‘death penalty’ is a one year program ban from participation, the harshest penalty the NCAA can give.