I firmly believe free community college should be provided and financed by the U.S. government. It will encourage learners to concentrate on their studies, and encourage them to work harder in school. In result, a significant increase in student grades will rise. Therefore, the opportunity will create student, specifically low-income student to have more advantages. Firstly, college should be granted to students freely because it will encourage them to concentrate on their educations.
A college education has become a necessity in today’s society. What if college was miraculously free. It would be like going to your public high school without paying that horrendous tuition fee. A lot of people say that free college is a dumb idea because it could potentially flood the market, and Others think it’s a great idea though, because more people would end up going to college because they don’t have to worry about financially paying for it. If there was a such thing about free college lower income students might reach graduation.
Money is the basis of living , even people with lower income degrees could support themselves before the cost of tuition went up drastically. However, when you add student loans in the mix , debt over takes the standard of living. Ellison has heavy focus on this because he wants to highlight a big reason why free tuition can be beneficial for people in the long run. He believes if free tuition was put in place , every college graduate, lower income or higher income, will be able to live within their
As we all know, college can be very expensive. With the scholarships and grants, college student-athletes can go to school for free and get their day-to-day needs such as food, housing, clothes, etc. Ackerman and Scotts, purpose is to show that college is a learning experience and with the help of college sports, the student-athletes will have a chance to grow and be successful in life rather than being exploited. However, critics believe that college student-athletes should be paid salary, like professional athletes, because they want people to see the “athletes are the rule, not the expectation” (par 11). They want the audience to think that it’s a rule for student-athletes to go play pro after two years, will no expectation.
If there is a job I can do at the college, I would work and hopefully, they lower the tuition for that class. I believe there should be one student loan rate for everyone that is affordable. Different banks have different rates depending on the college. A broader approach is necessary so all students can afford to go to college. Scholarships are helpful too, and I hope I receive this scholarship which is a way I am trying to minimize my debt.
Having free tuition for college means that more people who cannot afford it now, would end up going. This is a good thing in terms that more people are getting a good education and continuing their educational careers to hopefully obtain good job, but it also decrease the value of a college education. If more people are able to earn degrees, it devalues them. Finding jobs even with their qualifications would be difficult (Should college be free?). This idea would also apply to the students, mainly student-athletes, that work for multiple years to try to perfect their skill and obtain full or half scholarship.
Some may say that high school grads should go straight to college because it would help them in the future. With college experience people will be more successful in life with a good job and a nice house. However, people can’t enjoy their money if they keep spending it on student loans. If you go to work early then go to college you won’t have to pay back student loans, and you will have work experience. Without having to pay loans you can enjoy the money you earn and spend it on whatever you
Students who put in the time and effort with paying for college, they find a whole new world that opened up to them with job opportunities. I believe college should still offer scholarships and grants for the low income and middle class students, but charge tuition fees for all students. If college was free to everyone, maybe some students wouldn’t have responsibility and they might be
Maddie Berlemann Mrs. Mercer Honors Freshman lit. March 2, 2017 Tuition Free College Even though opponents say that free college would not be an option because faculty would push for more pay, tuition free college is good for reasons such as making cities more successful, students would not be crushed by debt, students would value higher education and it would benefit the poor. According to Lawrence S. Wittner, “Free public higher education provides educational opportunities for all.” Including the low income families and students. As prices of schools rise lower income families have harder times paying for it not to mention the “thousands of dollars in room, board, books, and other living expenses” as Lawrence S. Wittner explains.
Equal consideration in Education Everyone wants to go in college but not everybody can afford for their university finances. Students are finding ways to have a proper education due to their financial problem. Opportunity comes in athletical scholarship when you are physically fitted in the school. Adding that to be a student athlete is a great privilege for free education with their special treatment in academics. Is this because they have more than enough consideration in school than to other regular student?
Juniors and Seniors must continue going to study hall until they have raised their grades . Enforcing the “C rule” could also cause more scholarships for Webb City Students. If students are getting good grades and raising their grade point average then colleges would be more willing to give out scholarships. This also brings up the point that some people get scholarships just for the sports they play. If the “C rule” was enforced that would mean that any student who was playing sports would have good grades which would benefit them greatly when they go to college on the athletic scholarships.
People who receive an education are more likely to be successful and live a healthy and happy live; but those do not are more likely to live in poverty. Since it will help the economy to have better equipped citizens, the government should make college education free for
Moreover, financial literacy is beneficial to college students because it will make them be more responsible and teach them to choose the right decisions. Informing individuals about the money will help build their character and they will ultimately become more aware of the importance of money. Furthermore, students won’t only improve their accountability of money but also in life too. They will be more able to efficiently choose the right decisions and analyze the effect of the choices they
People with an education have a larger income, have a better chance of earning the respect of fellow citizens, and are more likely to get jobs. Knowledge is power, and many young people living in the Projects are intelligent and full of submerged potential, but they live in a place where it is an achievement just to graduate from high school. They have lost the hope that was alive and thriving during the life of their grandparents, when Martin Luther King was a beacon of hope. The children in the projects might have low expectations for their future, but holding on to hope and fierce determination is the only way they will leave their lives of poverty. Martin Luther King, Jr., emphasized, "I say to you today, my friends, that in spite of the difficulties and frustrations of the moment, I still have a dream" (King Jr.).
Do you plan on going to college? Should college be free? Right now, colleges are having people pay a lot of money to there, and others don’t have to pay a cent to go there because of scholarships. Whether it sports or projects that have gotten people scholarships; others have to pay. If it was free, people wouldn’t worry about paying, students would work harder to get accepted into big schools, and it would give people in a lower class have more opportunities.