Essay On Confederate Civil War Memorials

There is typically a definitive reason behind why a particular memorial is placed where it is, especially when the memorial commemorates a certain war. There is no doubt that the United State’s involvement in the division of Vietnam is questionable, however, American lives were taken away from their friends and families as a result of the government’s decision to go to war. The lives of those who fought for our nation were cut short, and their remembrance will surely be lost in time if they are not memorialized. Memorials are representative of past memories, both good and bad, and are largely developed out of respect towards those who lost their lives. Providing the public with a memorial, such as the Philadelphia Vietnam Veteran’s Memorial, allows for the people to gain further insight into the events that led up the present; past events define the modern world. The author, Suhi Choi, stated, “Memory is not merely an abstract image of the past, but also a frame that provides us with a way of constituting the past from the perspective of the present” (64). In the City of Brotherly Love, it is essential that the former soldiers of the city are remembered eternally. With such controversy surrounding the entire Vietnam conflict, the seclusion of this particular memorial is

When individuals ponder everything that went into the making of our nation, there is a plethora of different events to consider. Regardless of how many events, good or bad, have occurred in American history, all human beings alike tend to look at our history with tunnel vision—only focusing on the good. Our citizens, past and present, everyday people to politicians, either fail to acknowledge the existence of our historic downfalls or they manipulate these downfalls into something justifiable. Even more so now than ever, when bad things occur in America, they get purposely swept under the rug and forcefully shoved into the depths of the closet. The reconstruction that occurred post-Civil War is no exception to this aforementioned flaw. The

For many years people have been arguing whether certain controversial monuments, such as statues, should be destroyed or removed. A common type of monuments in this situation are the Confederacy monuments. These are various statues across the US which honor Confederate leaders or “heroes”. Many see these offensive since those people basically oppressed African Americans for years and were fighting to keep doing so. Some argue that the monuments should not be damaged or tampered with anyway since, even though the person might not have been the best, it is a historical artifact which therefore, should be preserved. The conflict surrounds whether the monuments should be destroyed, stored (in a museum etc), or left to remain. Personally, I believe that monuments, if historical, should not be damaged in anyway, but left to remain, or in specific occasions, preserved in a museum.

There is an issue which has sparked some conflict which is based on the topic of whether or not Confederate Statues and Confederate symbols should be removed due to the background that they represent. Though they may represent history, the history that they represent is done in such a way which’ll show support for the Confederacy and honoring Confederate Soldiers. I believe that cities shouldn’t be allowed to rename locations and remove Confederate Statues because this would be very similar to removing history from our everyday life.

After the conclusion of the Civil War, most southerners remembered the South as a heroic "Lost Cause" , while many other southerner groups continued to present remincense of the nation 's past. Advocates for the "Lost Cause" stated their work and ideas was not anything associated with politics. This claim is debatable but I agree with the Southerners point of view on the "Lost Cause" - it not having anything to do with politics.

South Carolina has scheduled another debate over the fate of the Confederate battle flag. This time it can 't be allowed to end in an unsatisfying compromise: The flag has no place flying on the grounds of the state capitol. (Shipley, 2015)

Mayors Landrieu’s gave a speech about the removal of confederate monuments. Many people are either for removing or not. Many Landrieu’s discusses his view on the topic. He is for the removal of the Confederate monuments. He said and first he didn’t understand the fuss about the removal the monuments. He said he would walk pass them and nor think anything, so he didn’t get it. One day he did understand why there was a debate about it and why people wanted them removed because his fiend asked him to put himself into the shoes of and African American mother and father and trying to explain to their fifth grader child who and why there is a monument of Robert E. Lee in their city. That changed his perspective and he understood why people were offended because of the monuments. He goes on and ask if we can stand in their shoes and explain Robert E. Lee. He knows where he stands and he wants us to stand with him. Everyone needs to be seen as equals and be able to live their best life’s without feeling they don’t belong. Mayor Landrieu (2017) states, “We have to reaffirm our commitment to a future where each citizen is guaranteed the uniquely American gifts s of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. (pg.9)” Landrieu point is that

On March  21, 1861 The state of Louisiana joined The Confederate States of America, on April 12, 1861 The American Civil War started and didn't end until four years later on, May 9, 1865 until The Union States of America won. The year is currently 2017 one hundred and fifty-two years since The American Civil War and Robert E. Lee a General in The Confederate army, Jefferson Davis who was the President of The Confederate States and P.G.T. Beauregard a Military officer in the Confederate states, whose monuments were all still up until four months ago they were taken down. The person responsible for removing the statues is Mayor Landrieu of New Orleans, Louisiana he expressed a movable speech to the people of New Orleans and the citizens and noncitizens

A big issue in today’s United States is removing Confederate history from the public due to the rise of killings involving race groups. Some will argue that doing away with Confederate history will some solve all problems; others argue that erasing Confederate history will not solve anything. The Solution to whether or not to erase Confederate history is to see if American’s history is better off with it or not.

The Confederate flag has been one the most controversial and divisive symbol in American history. Recently, in the wake of the Charleston church shooting, the country has been in an uproar of the confederate flag. The shooting sparked discussion on whether the flag is hateful or represents the south’s history and wanted the removal of the Confederate flag from the South Carolina state house. Many people believe that the confederate flag represents southern pride and southern history but in the mind of many others the flag represents slavery and the years and years of the oppression of African-Americans and other minorities.

The Confederate monuments from the Civil War in many cities, colleges, and universities are being asked to be taken down. The monuments are causing problems between the U.S. citizens. Many people are protesting and saying that the monuments are a symbol of racism, and symbolism of traitors to the U.S., and are used to show white supremacy. These monuments should be taken down from the public but they should not be destroyed. These monuments are an important symbol of American history and should be kept in a historical museum.

In the news today, a continual debate can be found about the significance of Confederate monuments and if they should remain or be removed. Confederate monuments that have been erected throughout the U.S. should be kept because of the preservation of America’s history. For instance, in the article, The Unbearable Lightness of Confederate-Statue Removal, the author lists how slaveholder monuments aren’t the only statues being vandalized, but the Lincoln Memorial and Mount Rushmore are other symbols of U.S. history that some believe need to “blow up” (Murdock). Every historical symbol can have both people who appreciate it and who oppose it. That doesn’t mean that we should tear down all symbols, but symbols in appropriate context lead to better

To begin with, Confederate statues, flags, and monuments has been the history of our country so the people and the future generation can see what America have dealt with to be where we are at. In the United States, the statues and monuments are representation of historic mark as they are important part of the US history. The monuments are very significant as it symbolizes history and some of those monuments are being removed. For example, a monument of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was removed in Maryland. One man stated that, "It has become increasingly clear in recent weeks that memorials such as this are hurtful to many residents in our community and elsewhere” (County “Here are the Confederate memorials that will be removed after Charlottesville”).

In Atlanta Ga, Charlottesville Nc, and in every other formerly Confederate State in the U.S. there has been controversial debates on whether or not the current standing Confederate statues should be removed from public areas. Many people claim that a modern society should not honor the racist soldiers who fought for slavery. Others believe that preserving historical accuracy is essential to learning from the mistakes of the past. The opinions of thousands of citizens clash with one another over the debate between offense and information. I believe that it is most beneficial for the majority of people if the current Confederate monuments remain where they are.

What do you think about Confederate Statues? Should cities and governments be allowed to take these statues down? The city of New Orleans had this problem. Many people were for taking the statue down and many against taking it down. The statue should be taken down seeing that as, the statues are an inaccurate representation of our past, many people don’t want to look in the past, and this statue didn’t honor the hero, but honored a killer instead.