Conflict of law in matrimonial causes
Introduction
The conflict of law is generally known as the private international law. The conflict of law between the two countries arises when there is a different system of law. Each country has its own set of domestic law regarding different issues which are followed by the court but a dispute arises when there is a foreign element in the cases. For example a person domiciled in India dies and leaves property in India and abroad then the question arises which country law will be applicable in this case, the law of the country in which he is domiciled or the law of the state where he has its immovable property.
Generally all the countries in the world recognise marriage as the union of man and woman but beyond this there is difference as in west,
…show more content…
The capacity of marriage depends upon the domicile of the person. Countries like India were people of different religion resides with different culture have different personal law to govern there capacity of marriage hence it is highly necessary for the law to follow the principle of lex domicile for the capacity of marriage. Different statute dealing marriages in India are Hindu Marriage Act, Christian Marriage Act, Mahomedan law, Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act. The age for marriage is also fixed in india, unless they acquire the specified age they don’t have the capacity to marry.
The condition for valid marriage among Hindu include minimum age, free consent by a person not suffering from any incapacity, and the stipulation that the parties should not be in the prohibited degree of relationship. According to the Muslim law, the party must attain the age of puberty, must not be barred by the rules of consanguinity. In Christian law a marriage is nullified if they marry within the prohibited degree consanguinity or affinity and neither party should have a spouse living or the earlier marriage is still in
In recent years, the question of how self-defense is justified has been prominent in communities all over the nation. The “Stand your Ground” laws were enacted to give victims the right to fight back when faced with a life-threatening situation. Events that have occurred after enacting this law have brought forward anger and push back from communities who have been effected. The criminal justice system and the public frequently disagree on the pros and cons of the “Stand your Ground” laws and therefore not all states have passed it. This paper will discuss the origin of the “Stand your Ground” laws, the conflicts that have risen it, and the pros and cons.
Stand Your Ground Law The Trayvon Martin case. This automatically should ring a bell in the mind of millions. This case sparked a deep debate about the systematic racism that is embedded within our government, and how legislation that are passed can continue to allow this to happen. Legislation such as the Stand Your Ground law, which is the defense that George Zimmerman used in his prosecution of the murder of young teen Trayvon Martin In the 2013 case of Florida v. Zimmerman ( Kessler) The Stand Your Ground Law is a highly controversial topic.
Imagine an individual, getting ready for their slumber. Now imagine an intruder breaking into there window with the intention to shoot anyone in its way. Recall that the homeowner is unable to legally defend himself and must retreat from the intruder. This scenario can be possible in all 50 states, but only Seventeen states do not give people the right to legally defend themselves, even if confronted with a person holding a weapon. This means a innocent person attempting to defend their family or himself would wrongly get accused if the intruder got injured.
The family plays a huge role in the wedding ceremony and as such, the bride and groom are described as part of their families coming together and accepting one another. Cultures that are high in institutional collectivism try and make decisions that is best for the group rather than the individual person (Lustig & Koester, 2013). Since the marriages are often arranged by the families, they make decisions that are in the best interest of the family. This is different from when an individual choices for themselves a spouse because they do so based on their own interest, not often taking into account the interest of their
Often times girls are married at a young age when they enter puberty, and may stop attending school to be with their husband and family once started. The marriage is a traditional ceremony and not a legal marriage. So states that have laws of being a certain age do not
People can best respond to conflict by staying positive because it affects their physical and mental health in a helpful way and can affect others around you in a positive way. It can help someone greatly in stressful situations when their life could be at risk. Positive thinking is one of the best ways to respond to conflict because it can affect your physical health in a constructive way. The Mayo Clinic Staff states that a positive attitude can, “Increase a person’s life span, can help them build up resistance to the common cold and cardiovascular disease, have better physical well-being, and better cardiovascular health”. Staying positive is somewhat crucial to a person’s health.
Hindus don't believe in arranged marriage. Although this may be true, in some parts of India forced marriage still exists. Additionally UNICEF stated that 48% of women in South Asian are forced to be married before they are 18. Not only are the being forced into marriage but are being forced to marry men older than them( UNICEF also states that the average age difference in arranged marriages is that the male is 4.5 years older). Not only can people be forced into an arranged marriage but so can you do children.
Are we obligated to obey unjust laws? Laws are important because they are guidelines for a state. Without laws citizens would not know how to act and cause harm to others. Laws are aimed at common good and keep a society together and functioning.
Conflict resolution happens often in the workplace that can either drive or disturb employees, supervisors, a team, and an entire organization. When supervisors allow conflict resolution to fester without taking immediate action, it can lead the organization into an unhealthy environment. In this paper, the topic for discussion will analyze various strategies that can be utilized to control and manage conflict resolution in the workplace, and the role of the supervisor during conflict resolution situations. In addition, a discussion will include how the workplace and its customers are impacted by a diverse workforce. Conflict Resolution Conflict in the workplace is inevitable, especially in a diverse workforce where employees possess different approaches to his or her job and come from various backgrounds, who share a common work space within an organization (SHRM, 2015).
People should realize that marriage is the close union and equal partnership of a man and a
In efforts to completely eradicate child marriages within its society, the Government of India enacted the 'Prevention of Child marriage Act 2006 ', which replaced the earlier legislation of 'Child Marriage Restraint Act 1929. ' This new Act is makes it possible to prohibit for child marriage, protect and provide relief to victim and enhance punishment for those who promote or are invovled in such marriage. This Act also calls upon the need to appoint 'Child Marriage Prohibition Officers ' to implement this act. South Asia Initiative to End Violence Against
As a member of society, there will be times where we would need to break the law in an important occasion. The laws were made for our society to be safe and they also serve as a protection of an individual’s rights. Laws prevent people from getting hurt or getting into situations they might regret later in their lives. But there will be scenarios where we would need to break the law for our protection, protection of our family, or in a state of an emergency. Breaking the law would be acceptable if lives are in danger or to prevent an even more serious law being made.
Natural law theory states that there are laws that are immanent in nature and the man made laws should correspond as closely as possible. Man can’t produce natural laws but he can find and discover through his reasoning. If a law is contrary to a natural law then it is not a law. Laws should be related to morality. It is a concept of a body of moral principal that is same for all the man
Human is born with the natural ability of reasoning whether or not it is a gracious gift from God as claimed. According to natural law, human is capable of deciding whether an action is morally right or wrong. We do not create what is evil and good, rather, we discover what is right or wrong. Besides, humans are morally obliged to use their reasoning capability to discern what the laws are and subsequently acting in conformity with them. Therefore, there is no reason why divine law must be superior than man-made law when human is just as effective and arguably, even more effective.
DEFINITION OF LAW: Law is outlined as the principles and regulations set by the governing authority, and have binding legal forces. It must be endorsed and obeyed by the citizens, subject to penalties or legal consequences. It depicts the will of the supreme power of the state. The basic purpose of law is to regulate the society, to safeguard and shield the rights of people and to resolve conflicts. It acts as barrier is preventing people from behaving in a negative manner that affects the rights and quality of life other people, hence violation of law implies the punishment of lawbreakers Dysfunction of Law: Dysfunction of law means failed to abide by the law.