Knowledge is not a concrete substance but an abstract concept that we construct ourselves, personally and socially, throughout the whole of our lives . The process of constructing knowledge is vast and immeasurable. When it comes to the point of knowledge, there are different kinds of knowledge and different ways of acquiring them and on one side its theoretical knowledge and on other is practical knowledge.
Application is defined as the action of putting something into special use or purpose. Creation of knowledge can be influenced by the application. We apply various ideas and thought in many aspects in our day to day lives to acquire knowledge. However at some point theoretical knowledge that we learn in today’s world has no purpose of
…show more content…
Knowledge that we gain from science is always reasonable and justified, such as theoretical knowledge or practical knowledge has many practical application use in our daily life. Initially the basic concept of science is taught through theoretical knowledge from the textbook and then these theoretical knowledge is used as a base to gain practical knowledge, which in turn creates the two types of knowledge are mixed together where they are applied in reality.
Physics is the study of the interaction between energy and matter. It has many applications in our day to day lives. The x-ray which was discovered by physicist Wilhelm Conrad Rontgen in November 8th 1895 has influenced today’s world in the field of medicine. The concept of x-ray is formed through the theoretical concepts of wavelengths and electromagnetic radiation which is used in the field of medicine where the concepts of light is applied for use of health. The electromagnetic spectrum consist of various forms of radiations with varying frequency energy and wavelength. UV rays, infrared rays and x-rays are part of the electromagnetic spectrum. X-rays have high frequency unlike visible lights, which gives x-rays more energy and thus enables them to penetrate human tissue cells. Since bones in our body contains calcium which is denser than other tissues, and this allows them to
…show more content…
The theoretical knowledge that we gain through studies of experiments or from the proven theories has no application in our lives but the value of knowledge does not diminish. This happens because different perspectives of knowledge affect the value of the knowledge. The premise suggests that for different people the required knowledge for them is different for other people, as such the level of importance given to this knowledge is relatively less or given a great importance. For instance the study of Andromeda galaxy also defined by the astronomer as, M31, or NGC 224 is a spiral type galaxy, which is about 2.4million light-years from the Milky Way galaxy and this galaxy is known to be the nearest galaxy from Milky Way. The insight of nearest galaxy does not have any application in our day to day life or any uses in our lives. Furthermore, the study of galaxies are related to astronomy, which is considered a pseudo-science. This means that astronomy’s logical reasoning does not always create real knowledge, hence faith is also needed for people to believe what they think. Therefore although the knowledge has no application the value of the knowledge is greatly beneficial to different
The truth is that one cannot unlearn something, so the Heath brothers provide the readers with two ways to defeat the Curse of Knowledge. “The first is not to learn anything. The second is to take your ideas and transform them” (20). The Heaths claim the six principles are the best weapons to beat the Curse of
This idea can be applied to the past advancements of technology, science, and medicine, which have helped humanity and can continue to. Knowledge, when used with precaution, can assist in the evolving of humanity. However, when knowledge is taken
Otherwise, the traditional academic arrangements of knowledge can be outdated
This reflects on the argument that Scientific Revolution's research was not politically and socially motivated. There is a question if the methods in modern science were originally 'pure science'? Or do their origins have personal motives behind
Knowledge is the condition of knowing something. When given it does not decrease, but will only increase. It is collective thoughts and experiences people go through. Books are the greatest source of knowledge and help develop the human mind. Knowledge also helps people not commit the same mistakes again and again.
It is information that's adapted to a purpose to create emotion and meaning to the world. Knowledge should not be expected to be perfect. Knowledge is created by imaginative and critical thought. Knowledge for the future helps us think outside the box to be able to communicate logically with one another.
A Theory Of Knowledge “The good life is one inspired by love and guided by knowledge,” said Bertrand Russell according to brainyquotes.com. Knowledge is significant to mankind because it provides us with boundless power with which homosapiens use to dominate over all living creatures who are physically stronger than us. Additionally, the thirst of knowledge we have acquired has resulted in numerous scientific, medical, philosophical, and geographical discoveries that have caused the mind to perceive the world in all the magnificent ways it does. Lastly, by knowing what happened throughout history, we bring ourselves the opportunity to learn from mistakes created in the past so we do not repeat the fault.
For hundreds of years philosophers have assigned knowledge the supreme role and have called knowledge the ultimate purpose and meaning of human life. Aristotle, the famous Greek philosopher said “theoretical wisdom, that is, knowledge of the first principles and of what follows from them, is by nature our purpose and is the ultimate thing for the sake of which we have come to be. This is the highest form of knowledge since it is knowledge with grounding of the highest things. Through this kind of knowledge one not only knows what follows from the first principles, but also possesses truth about the first principles.” Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872–1970) was a British philosopher, logician, essayist and social critic best known for his work in mathematical logic and analytic philosophy.
For instance, the scientific studies of Einstein and Newton are still valid whenever something needs to be proven or improved like technology, space exploration,
To what extent does possessing knowledge grants us privilege and advantages? Knowledge gives us the basic on how we behave and think. It shapes who we are because we act upon what we know. The more we know the more things we took into consideration before acting or reacting to something.
Falsificationism, though, helped me to understand that induction is good for everyday life, but not for science. I learnt that it is possible to falsify someone’s theory or my theory be falsified, but Kuhn’s and Lakatos’ approaches made me understand that it is better not to abandon a theory even if it is falsified. Research programmes influenced me mostly, since the fundamental hypothesis of the hard core and the supplementary assumptions of the protective belt, can be better applied not only to physics, but also natural sciences. For me science has to be explained in an objective way, so the anarchistic theory of science did not influence me, because it talks about individual’s freedom and subjectivity. Finally, the modern approaches of Bayesianism and New Experimentalism did not satisfy me at all and they did not help me in order to define what science is.
Modern science is typically subdivided into the natural sciences, which study the material world, the social sciences which study people and societies, and the formal sciences like mathematics. The formal sciences are often excluded as they do not depend on empirical observations.[5] We have to keep in mind that science helps us describe how the world is, but it cannot make any judgments about whether that state of affairs is right, wrong, good, or bad and individual people must make moral judgments.
Whilst the knower’s perspective is always essential in the pursuit of knowledge, it’s essence is greater in some areas of knowledge than others. Perspective shapes both what we pursue in knowledge and it affects how we interpret pursued knowledge. Whilst the latter has greater influence over subjective areas such as the arts and history, the former affects even the pursuit of knowledge in more objective areas such as the natural sciences and maths. What’s more, for knowledge to be knowledge, there must be a knower. Each individual knower gains knowledge through the ways of knowing reason and emotion (amongst others); these ways of knowing shape and are shaped by our perspective.
In mathematics the knowledge we obtain is justified with reason that have straightforward theories and laws. In natural science on the other hand the information we collect is firstly obtained with observations which can be perceived in the wrong manner and then carried out wrong after that, in the natural world things are always changing therefore the results we get now won’t necessarily be correct one hundred years down the line therefore the knowledge we have now of the natural sciences is correct until proven wrong. Knowledge is trustworthy in most of our subjects at school but we can never know if the information we are receiving is 100% accurate or not because in the future we may learn that the information we have is
Theory of Knowledge Essay “Without application in the world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” Consider this claim with respect to two areas of knowledge. In contemporary society, it is often argued that the value of knowledge is determined by its application to the real life situations. I am of an emphatic opinion that without application, the value of knowledge certainly abates.