Criminal Negligence
Criminal negligence can be defined as carelessly acting without taking reasonable care and putting others like in danger. The principle of Criminal negligence applies to medical practitioner when he shows gross negligence in the treatment of patient and ultimately leading to physical injury to the patient and in some case even death of the patient. The doctors are not being held criminally responsible for the patient’s death unless there is some negligence on his part while treating the patient. The most important factor to prosecute any medical practitioner under the medical negligence is the degree of negligence.
The Supreme Court in Jacob Mathew v State of Punjab has provided some grounds relating the degree of negligence
…show more content…
The operation was not a complex or complicated operation. On investigation it was found that the cause of death was “not introducing a cuffed end tracheal tube of proper size to prevent the aspiration of the blood from the wound in the respiratory passage” . The Supreme Court held that even if it to be assumed that the Appellant was negligent, he would not be criminally liable as the alleged act was not grossly negligent. At the most the accused can be liable for negligence in tort for damages and nothing more than that. The Court further expressed that if the liability of the medical practitioner were to be extended to the criminal law then it would result into fear amongst the medical practitioner to be held criminally liable in the case of slight mishap and would restrict them to treat the patients to best of their ability. The Court also went on to state that extending medical practitioners liability to criminal law would affect the society at large and would shake the mutual confidence between the doctor and the …show more content…
In the present case the principle of Res Ipsa Loquitor(the thing speaks for itself) is applied. Here in this case the wife of the complainant was treated for wrongly treated for typhoid fever wherein she had malaria fever and due to this she got wrong medication which resulted into further aggravation of her health. The Supreme Court in its final verdict awarded the compensation of Rs 2 Lakh to the complainant.
The most important element in case of gross negligence is that prima facie case must be established before the court, this principle was first observed in the case of Dr. Anand R. Nerkar vs. Smt. Rahimbi Shaikh Madar The Court held that cases where professionals like doctors, lawyers are involved and a criminal complaint is filed against them the court must be slow in entertaining such application if there isn’t adequate material before it, because one case can result into disastrous consequences like end of career and reputation of a
Wrongful Convictions: Exonerated by DNA Since 1992, 333 people in the United States have been wrongfully convicted and exonerated by DNA testing. Of these 333 people, 20 served time under death row. (Inn Proj) Because of this, faith in the criminal justice system is at times questioned. 1.
Hospitals can be sued for medical mal practice when they grant privileges to doctors that are not competent to perform procedure and failure to prevent patient form harm or death. This was the result that leading the estate to file claim against Amityville hospital for unlawful death
This is because the time frame after was from so long ago that there was not going to be much evidence presented to prove them “guilty.” The laws were so different back then that cases such as this would be hard to prove. Overall, because of this time period, the medical field took advantage of an individual. Disregarding the time period, any medical field should not take any opportunity that makes them take advantage of one’s given human
Name That Liability The name of the responsibility is negligence due to falls of patients in intensive care unit. The liability may occur due to the medical staff that forget to put the brakes on the beds, put in a low position, the call light within reach and personnel items easily reach to every patient. These falls can bring a lot of injuries to patients and fractures (loss of continuity of bone tissue. It ranges from a small crack to total bone fracture displacement of the two ends of the bone fracture), trauma to the skull and face (injuries to the skull and face are especially important, since the intensity of the shock can affect the central nervous system (CNS), located within the cranial cavity), trauma to the extremities (as a result
After knowing the report of the doctor, the state allowed the prosecutor to pursue criminal charges on
INTRO There has been 7 public inquires held by the provinces in the last 20 years that have examined wrongful convictions The justice system is organized with many rules and procedures that make it supposedly difficult for a wrongful conviction to occur -recognition of the falibiulity of the Canadian criminal justice system -serious implication -trust in the justice system erodes and innocent people suffer. Commission names The Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall, Jr., Prosecution The Commission on Proceedings Involving Guy Paul Morin The Inquiry Regarding Thomas Sophonow
For instance, a physician might argue that the injuries were not the result of their medical care and that their care followed their medical professional standards. Alongside challenging the element of negligence, physicians might try to prove that the injuries the plaintiff endured were a result of their own negligence ("Defenses to Medical Malpractice", n.d.). For example, the injuries a patient receives can occur if they do not inform their physician their entire medical history. As a result, they can be prescribed medications or treatments that can cause adverse reactions or injury. This is especially true in instances where physicians may try unconventional forms of treatment to care for their
There were specific situations that led to the cause of Julie Thao's actions of medication error and the death of Jasmine. The situation could have completely been avoided had Julie followed the code of ethics and avoided shorts to provide proper care for the patient. The state claimed that Thao's mistake was caused by actions, omissions and unapproved shortcuts, however, there were other factors that played a role in her carelessness as well. While failure to comply with procedure has been a factor in the medication administration error, other factors contributed as well. For example, failure to properly use the information system, or to ignore alerts or warnings have also resulted in preventable errors (Nelson, Evan, & Gardener, 2005).
The court found the “Defendant's care of Claimant fell below acceptable standards of practice” (Stashenko, 2015). In 2009 a former inmate of the Hawaii corrections department was awarded close to $1 million in damages for an incident in 2003, in which the physician’s failure to give the correct type and dosage of antibiotic for an infection in his scrotum. This resulted in 6 subsequent surgeries and the removal of his scrotum, rendering him
Mistakes like these are made more than people think. Not giving full information in the courtroom can lead people to fates that they don’t deserve. More than one doctor should have testified for both criminals. The more observations would leave less room for
In the case Riser v. American Medical Int'l Inc., Dr. Lang was sued by four siblings for medical malpractice. Their mother at the time was taken to the hospital for impaired circulation in both the arms and legs. She was seen by Dr. Sottiurai who deemed it necessary for her to have a bilateral brachial arteriogram where after talking to her and her family was able to get a consent for the procedure. Not having the capable means to perform the procedure Dr. Sottiurai had her transferred to another hospital and placed her under the care of Dr. Lang. Once there Dr. Lang performed the procedure, but instead of doing the consented procedure he ended up doing a femoral arteriogram that later led to the patient having a seizure and dying.
It It f It frustrates me what Dr. Anna Pou had to go through with the lawsuits of the Memorial Medical Center incident. As Healthcare professionals, being sued for making the rightful decision for the patient and the hospital is unjust. Healthcare professionals like Dr. Pou, have taken the Hippocratic oath, and one of the promises made within that oath is “first, do no harm”. Hospital’s should not be so quick to make such an important decision of pressing charges to their faculty; more trust should be placed in them. In addition, she made it clear her intentions were just to ‘‘help’’ patients ‘‘through their pain,’’ on national television.
Prescription medication Just because a doctor can legally prescribe medication, does not mean there is responsibility for doing so. For example, if you loved one became addicted to legally prescribed opioids, such as hydrocodone, there may be a case for wrongful death if this addiction was the cause of your loved one 's death. But the list of possibilities does not end with addictive medications. Anytime a doctor is not adequately following up with his or her patient and a patient has adverse side effects that lead to death, there is the potential for a wrongful death case. Alcohol related death
Health Care Law: Tort Case Study Carolann Stanek University of Mary Health Care Law: Tort Case Study A sample case study reviewed substandard care that was delivered to Ms. Gardner after having sustained an accident and brought to Bay Hospital for treatment. Dr. Dick, a second-year pediatric resident, was on that day in the ED and provided care for Ms. Gadner. Dr. Moon, is the chief of staff and oversees the credentialing of all physicians at Bay Hospital.
In this case under specific conditions, the proof of causation required for the defendants to be liable was satisfied in proving that there was a material increase in the risk of the contraction of mesothelioma. Exposures by both employers contributed substantially to the risk. Unlike in McGhee where there was only one possible cause of the dermatitis (brick dust), there was two possible employers who are liable. Based on McGhee, Lord Hoffman agreed that as the case reflected the necessary features outlined by Lord Bingham, that it was correct for the House