In conclusion you can learn to not get judged by understanding topics that your friends like, speaking with confidence, and by ignoring people. If you understand topics that your friend like then they will want to talk to you. If you speak with confidence then people will think that you know what you’re talking about. You can also just ignore people so they will stop bothering you. You shouldn’t judge oters so people can feel equal and so they don’t have conflicts with someone because that someone could be your friend.
His gist is that privacy should be respected which makes him moderate moralism, law should only intervene when society won’t tolerate certain behaviour, law should be a minimum standard not a maximum standard and act as general guideline. Is the act of polyandry tolerable by the society? In some society it is tolerable but in some they will not. However, to abolish the act of polyandry will also intervene with the privacy on the individuals. Devlin would have thought the act of polyandry to be immoral and disintegrates the society however, being a moderate moralism he would not have wanted to intervene with the privacy of other unless the act has become very widely practiced and start causing harm to the society.
That fit into a group is not a priority in life. You can be part of the “cool” ones but that is nothing if aren’t happy. You will just spend your life following the society instructions or labels. Maybe we should brake some rules and try to find what really makes you happy, as Jerry did. I think that what Emile do was a very idiot reaction.
These three concepts include self-awareness, knowledge, and skills. Self-awareness is understanding one’s own self and the values and beliefs and how these may or may not impact you in the counselling relationship. It is important to never assume anything about a culture, practicing self-awareness can help you avoid doing this. It can also help because when you practice self-awareness you are able to reflect on any negative beliefs that you may have a about a culture, and from there you can work on changing those beliefs. Next key issue, is having knowledge about various cultures, while it would be impossible to know or learn everything about every culture it is good to have a basic understanding of the culture in which your client may be from.
Lao-Tzu says that the people become less virtuous when their government places more prohibitions on them. I agree with Lao-Tzu in this statement. People would not automatically become righteous simply because the government has forbidden things that are deemed immoral or socially unacceptable. The prohibitions may just hide the problems and may not necessarily solve much. The attention that the prohibition has brought towards the issue may cause people to purposely seek out loopholes or other ways to exploit these laws.
‘’Globalization is a widely and somewhat loosely used term intended to describe the recent and rapid process of intercontinental economic, social, and political integration. This worldwide integration allows people to communicate, travel and invest internationally, and helps companies market their produces widely, acquire capital human and material resources more efficiently share advanced technology, and enjoy economics of scale. While many benefit from globalization, others are hurt economically, some cultures may be harmed, and local environments may suffer.
People would say that law destroys the society for it prevents us to be free. The law may sometimes be “inconsiderate” but it keeps us in order. We may sometimes say it is harsh but it is because we are used to be “free” in a way that we do not follow rules and order. These things happen to us because we are not led by a good public official. Even the officials do not follow the law because they think they are an exemption which is not.
What is globalization and culture? What effect or impact has globalization had on culture? Globalization is the inclination of speculation assets and organizations to move past local and national markets to different markets the world over, subsequently expanding the interconnection of the world. Globalization has had the impact of particularly expanding worldwide exchange and social trade. Also, because of globalization international business grown, improved and removed a lot of obstacles when interacting with international markets.
That perception comes with the skill of cultural relativism, and individuals using cultural relativism would be less intolerant of other cultures and accept that there are other cultures besides their own. Multiculturalism would lead to the awareness of the validity of each and every culture and that there are many similarities and differences between all of them. Multiculturalism as a result would aid in resolving cultural conflicts as a result of intolerance. It is still not the solution for cultural conflicts but integral in reaching it, because multiculturalism facilitates and encourages the changes in perception but it does not guarantee a change in levels of
Based on the arguments and counter arguments about the impact of censorship on freedom of speech, I personally feel that it has a more of an adverse effect. Censorship is nothing but curbing the right to freedom of speech, though there are arguments for that too. Banning and censorship only makes people more curious about the matter and in turn make it popular, which is the opposite of its intention. But denying individuals of information and platform to discuss the censored matter, will not prevent tensions in society, rather it has the reverse effect. It is true that young minds are very impressionable, but also a faulty statement in saying one could control the perception of a child 's mind by mere removal or prevention of information.