Introduction
The globalization phenomenon started a few centuries ago and has been shapping many dimensions of our lifes without us realizing it. This engine started as an economic process but soon lead to tremendous changes in our society – the way we eat, work or travel is now a product of it. The current generation is now protagonist of one of the biggest challenges of all – to connect the dots between all this heterogeneity around the world, without neglecting their own identity. Markets were revolutionized - they are no more selling in a local perspective – now, clients might have different nationalities from producers. However, engaging with international business policies will first need the consent and mediation of governments. So,
…show more content…
Both factors depend a lot of the economic freedom rate of nations. Economic freedom is related with market-based systems and property rights, where there are much more incentives for individuals or companies to start or develop processes and ideas. If we take a look at the Index of Economic Freedom Map (Fig. 1), we are able to verify that most African, some South America and Asian nations (with some specific exceptions) are characterized by a low economic freedom. But countries where economic freedom is high, generally registrated more economic growth. Also, in these countries economically free, the majority of them are described for having a democratic political system. We may imply that economic freedom goes hand in hand with democratic policies. On the other hand, The Freedom House also reports that for the eight consecutive year, there was “an overall erosion in global freedom, with 54 countries registering declines”, associating this fall to the “authoritarian powers’ active resistance to democratic change”. Nations instead of building up a stronger and global position are backing up. From all the evidences considered, it seems reasonable to assume that globalization instead of taking steps forward, is retreating. Global institutions should step in these situations, where nations stumble to succeed and evince the economical potential of a more-free …show more content…
While totalitarists regimes are maintained, where liberty is a condition banned from the rights of the individuals, the world still has a long path to make till the desired integration of the economic system is reached. Also, terrorism and repressive governments are barriers of political globalization that, in the end, will hold back economic globalization. As Olu Fasan said “once a country makes a commitement to economic openness and integration, it is inevitable and, indeed, imperative, that it must have the appropriate legal and institutional framework to support its integration into the global economy”. Sooner or later, nations will have to suffer a transformation, which turns its systems into more a more legitimate one, that is, democratic. But it’s important to understand democracy not as an end in itself, but as a mean that tries to promote the best and fair
It is no coincidence that nations which rank among the highest in standards of living are also those that have produced by wide margins the most Nobel Laureates and have the most individual freedoms (X). Most of the greatest inventions in modern history have come from free countries and not from tyrannies. For example, the United States, one of the freest nations in history, has produced more Nobel Prize winners than all other nations combined, and those nations run by communist and collectivist societies, such as China and the Middle East, have won just a small fraction
If America did not encourage a democracy among these nations they would have been subjected to communism; this would take away any rights that they would receive by living in a democracy. By extending political and
Many of our respected Canadians are global citizens, and that is how it should be. The fourth argument in favour of prioritizing democracy promotion in our foreign policy—and the one I am most sympathetic to—emerges from Canadian values. Regardless of how well we practice it ourselves, democratic governance is a critical part of our country’s history and a continuing aspiration for its citizens. It also continues to inspire many around the globe who live under repressive governments, as the recent demonstrations by Burmese monks so vividly show.
As a former leader of the free world, President Obama evidences and clarifies the benefits and defining qualities of a democracy that encourages for the formation of more democratic forms of government. “Governments that respect the rights of their citizens and abide by the rule of law do better, grow faster, draw more investment than those who don’t” (President Obama). This respect not only establishes a peaceful relationship between the government and its people but also allows freedom to reign. This analysis of the effects of democracy on human rights is necessary, for it is quite evident that in authorities and monarchies these same freedoms are not granted.
“Is a democracy, such as we know it, the last improvement possible in government? Is it not possible to take a step further towards recognizing and organizing the rights of man? There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are derived, and treats him accordingly.” To answer his question democracy is not the last improvement possible as we have witnessed over the years, also we do need to realize why those who are in a power/ higher authority that us get the final decision and we also need to realize that we give them this power to oppress and undermine us so that they are the all
In Milton Friedman's eyes, competitive capitalism is a superior form of economic organization that guarantees not only economic but also political freedom by separating economic power from the political one. If a free market is allowed to work with its own logic following the law of supply and demand, Friedman contends, it will provide the freedom of choice to individuals that can counteract the possible threat of coercive power. What Friedman does not address, however, is the possibility that an authoritarian government can wield its absolute power in both the economic and the political spheres, promoting capitalism in an international market while curbing democracy. The freedom to make decisions as producers and consumes or as workers and employers can indeed coexist with, and oftentimes overshadows, the lack of choice as a citizen who is formally entitled to participate in politics. In fact, the advance in material life made possible by a more efficient market system obscures the problem of
“Democracy During Cold War” Democracy, a voting based system, is one of the most widely recognized regime in the present day world. A democratic government protects all the citizens’ human rights, allows people to participate in politics, and has laws that everyone has to follow equally. The Cold War was an important time period to the democratization of countries around the globe and the ideas of democracy are struggling in the modern world. The U.S. promotion of democracy helped countries all throughout Europe to keep their democratic government stabilized.
International Economy. (21), pp. 38-50 17. Peterson, T.M and Thies, C.G. (January 2014) 'The Demand for Protectionism: Democracy, Import Elasticity, and Trade Barriers. '
3. Globalization Throughout the last decades, globalization became a real phenomenon, but history tells us that it is actually not a new social, historical phenomena, but has, under different names and manifestations, been with us for a long time. It is actually not only the continuation of the liberalization of international trade, which began in the mid-19th century with the launch of cross-border trade over long distances and later with intensive large-scale mobility of labor and capital. During capitalism, globalization has amplified due to the lust for profit, which is driven by capitalists across the globe. Indeed, globalization has significantly strengthened ever since.
Totalitarianism is a political and social concept that explains a form of government where the state has all control over the civilians. Such government assumes full power, without any limitations. As put by Juan Linz, a totalitarian scholar, the three main factors of a totalitarianism government are “a monistic center of power; an ideology developed, justified and pursued by the leadership; and mass participation in political and social goals encouraged and even demanded by that same leadership” (Silberstein 42). Throughout the 20th century the manifestation of totalitarianism was an extreme measure of harsh political occurrences.
INTRODUCTION. This assignment focuses mainly on the generally utilized meaning of Totalitarian is "An administration sort that allows no individual flexibility" while, Liberal Democracy is characterized as "A majority rules system in light of the acknowledgment of individual rights and opportunity". Liberal Democracy characteristics it is essential to consider the benefits and demerits of both the types of governments. Majority rules system and Totalitarianism are two ideas that contrast from each other as it were.
Introduction Nowadays people can communicate easily. They can share their ideas, their cultures even with people who are not in their countries. They can trade, transporting products around the world in just a few days. This is a big economy where everything related to each other. This is globalization.
Multiple sources will be used from print media to internet sources to give a thorough look into what ‘Totalitarianism’ and ‘liberal democracies’ are. Conceptual Orientation: • Democratic: Government by the people,
(1959) argued that, the study of international relations in the newly founded Soviet Union and later in communist China was stultified by officially imposed Marxist ideology, in the West the field flourished as the result of a number of factors: a growing demand to find less-dangerous and more-effective means of conducting relations between peoples, societies, governments, and economies; a surge of writing and research inspired by the belief that systematic observation and inquiry could dispel ignorance and serve human betterment; and the popularization of political affairs, including foreign affairs. Edward H. (1939) argued that, the international relations among other roles also it promotes the improvement of global economic governance and cooperation among emerging markets. The countries raise the voice and representativeness of developing countries in global economic
Critics may raise a question here that replacing many states with one state is merely exposing the world population from a smaller menace to a larger one, but behold, this is not a Nation-State made up of groups of people living together in a close proximity for economics and culture. In fact, it will be the state that will comprise seven continents and all the people of the Earth. Moreover, since all the people of the world in this case will be living in the same country, there will be no need of military expenditures; instead, there will be internal policing. By recognizing the atrocities of the dreadful venom of the nation-state, people of the world should strive together for the creation of the Republic of Earth with zero military expenditure. A Republic where the oil reserves of Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Canada, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Russia, Libya, Nigeria, Kazakhstan, Qatar, China, United States, Angola, Algeria and Brazil will be the collective property of the inhabitants of the Earth.