Lola Cleverley
American Government
Mr. Baker
2 March 2023
The Electoral College vs. The District Method
The Electoral College is the system by which the United States elects our president. The number of electors each state gets is based on its representation in Congress, 1 vote for every senator and representative. The electors vote for the candidate that got the most votes in the state, meaning winner takes all the votes. The electoral college has always successfully chosen a president and benefited small states. However, in the more recent years there has been much debate as to whether or not this system works for our country. There have been five times when the winner of the popular vote loses the election leaving citizens wondering
…show more content…
Instead of ‘winner takes all’, the winner would receive one vote per congressional district won, with the popular vote winner gaining an additional two votes per state. This method would be easy to implement because people already know how it works. Maine and Nebraska are the only two states currently using this method, so people are familiar with the idea. Likewise, it’s similar to the way the House of Representatives are voted in, meaning American voters would understand how and why we are using this method. The constitution states in Article II, Section 1, Clause 2, “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of electors…”. This gives each state the freedom to choose how the electoral votes are chosen. Significantly, the district method is constitutional and has already proven to work in two states. Admittedly, it is known that gerrymandering can take place using congressional districts. While this is a big problem, our legislation will have to do their best to prevent gerrymandering from changing the election. This is only one flaw of the district method and does not outweigh the benefits and positives this method …show more content…
This method is already used in Maine and Nebraska and has proven to work successfully in both states. Voters already understand congressional districts so it makes the process easier to implement. Both candidates have a true and accurate shot at winning the election and a more precise winner will be chosen. Last, this will persuade more voters to show up and cast their vote, because they will believe their vote will actually make a difference. Overall, the congressional district method will show more benefits than drawbacks and will change the future of voting and electing presidents
I propose that the man chosen as president should be able to take all for themselves, being able to choose the state’s presidential electors. I also suggest that we stop using our current system for electing the president. I would say that we should use a national popular vote. Since the people within the United States is rather at large. Even though this puts southern states at a great electoral disadvantage.
While this is a system that is working and has worked before, it is not entirely fair. The Electoral College has its flaws. For starters, third parties are given virtually no chance to win the electoral vote. The amount of electors for each state doesn’t give all states a fair amount of power and the electoral system as a whole undermines
Winner Take All System One of the main appeals of the electoral college system is that it avoids the “tyranny of the majority” by creating a way for the less popular candidate to win the presidency. Unfortunately, the system was unsuccessful in
“The Electoral College was created by the Founders because they did not trust people enough to allow them to directly elect the president.” Since the majority of the American people had limited education and communication, the founders felt the “average voter lacked the information to be an informed, unbiased judge of candidates for presidency.” Therefore when voters cast their ballot, the college reviews the peoples’ choices and then decides which of their preferences are best. (Lenz and Holman, 87) Many people feel that this system is undemocratic because they are not able to directly vote for their candidate and because the winner of the popular vote can lose the electoral vote.
The Electoral College being the way that it is makes sure that each state has a say in the election. Each state has a certain amount of electors based off its states population. This means that the smaller states aren’t completely overshadowed by the bigger states, because the smaller states have a way greater say in the election under this plan than they would
Each district will be formed with population and land area taken into equal account to form a group of districts that are equally balanced demographically. The popular vote of each of the three-five districts will be counted as a point to a candidate in a general election, sizing down the electoral college to a mare inclusive voice. In state referendums, each district will represent itself. Districts will be sectioned off by experts on demographics and bipartisan political analysts to make each one more balanced. They will
Christopher Pearson gives us an interesting piece of data that “the winner-take-all rule is why 70% of American voters are ignored”(NCSL Website). This statistic states that a majority of voters’ votes are meaningless overall, as the winner takes all system overrules their vote. This statistic shows the people’s ideologies of being able to vote for their presidential candidate and to have an equal say as everybody else is not being followed as it ignores many of the voter’s votes in order to give all of the electors to one presidential candidate, rather than splitting the electors among the electoral candidate in either a popular vote of the state, or by regions of the state. However, for the political parties, the winner takes all system helps their political parties much more than it does for the people. Pearson gives as an example that the winner takes all system “gave then-candidate Donald Trump all of Pennsylvania’s twenty electors the moment he got one vote more than Hillary Clinton inside Pennsylvania” (NSCL Website), stating that the political parties had much more benefit to this system by not having to worry about certain states, such as California and Texas.
This system ensures there is a clear winner. “There is pressure for runoff elections when no candidate wins a majority of the votes cast; that pressure, which would greatly complicate the presidential election process, is reduced by the Electoral College, which invariably produces a clear winner.” (Electoral college). The Electoral College method unlike other voting methods will clearly have a winner. Some may say the district method is better because votes are distributed based on the popular vote winner within each of the state’s congressional districts and statewide popular vote winner receives two additional electoral votes.
Granted a candidate would almost never win all eleven states because the majority of these states tend to be predominantly democrat or republic, the fact that only eleven states alone can determine who 's the president puts to question the value of the remaining 39 states. Document B, explains the winner-take-all method and how unfair the method is to third party candidates. The chart shows how even though both third party candidates won about 7% and 19% of the popular vote but won 0% of the electoral vote. In Document E, Will states “the winner-take-all electoral vote allocation tends to produce a winning margin that looks like national decisiveness” There are over 300 million people in the United States, but just 538 people get to decide
Electoral College has maintained for hundreds of years and it’s time for a change because of the more and more serious problems it is causing. These are some reasons why we should consider replacing this system with a new more efficient one. Firstly, Electoral College creates the possibility for the candidate who loses the popular vote but wins the electoral vote to become president. In the much-publicized election of 2000, Vice President Al Gore beat Governor George W. Bush by more than 500,000 votes in the national popular tally but lost in the Electoral College because of a last-minute, 537-vote margin in Florida .
This week’s lesson gave me more clarity on the-the Electoral College. It was confusing at first to hear that the popular vote does not win an election. Bush lost the popular votes, but won the electoral vote in 2000, cleared by the Supreme Court (POLS201). I think it is better for the candidate to worry about the crucial electoral votes than the popular votes.
The Electoral College began with Article II of the Constitution, stating that each state will appoint as many electors as it is entitled senators and representatives. (Levin-Waldman, 2016) The president of the United States is elected by what is called the Electoral College. There are a total of 538 electoral votes cast, and all candidates elected to run for office from their respective party needs 270 in order to win. “For most states, the candidate who wins a majority of votes in that state takes all of its electors.
The Electoral College is the process to which the United States elects the President, and the Vice President. The founders of the Constitution came up with this process. This was done to give additional power to the small states, and it was done to satisfy them. It works by the citizens of the United States electing representatives called electors. Each state is given the same amount of electors, as they are members of congress.
Several years after the United States came to be, the Constitutional Convention met to determine how the new nation should govern itself. The delegates saw that it was crucial to have a president and vice president, but the delegates did not want these offices to reflect how the colonies were treated under the British rule. The delegates believed that the president’s power should be limited, and that he should be chosen through the system known as the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a body of people who represent the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the electing of the president and vice president. Many citizens feel that the Electoral College goes against our nation’s principle of representative democracy, while others
Electoral college has been with us since the birth of the constitution, and to this day we are still using this type of system to this day. The Electoral College is a system that the United States uses to elect our upcoming presidents and vice presidents. Each state has electors equal to their senate member and house of representatives, however who ever gets the highest popular vote in the state gets the electoral vote. The issue is the Electoral College do not give votes to the people, but to the states. Which has some unfair consequences.