“Nuclear power will help provide the electricity that our growing economy needs without increasing emissions. This is truly an environmentally responsible source of energy.” Michael Burgess Prior to the introduction of nuclear energy, fossil fuel was thought to be the only available source in producing energy. Although fossil fuel, such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas, contains high energy value, it produces too many harmful byproducts that ultimately pollute our environment. With the rising concerns over global warming as more and more greenhouse gases accumulate in our Earth’s atmosphere, many voice such opinions that new alternative, yet sustainable method must be adopted to produce energy. Nuclear energy is one of the several alternative energy sources that have been introduced ever since.
Oil, coal, solar, wind, or nuclear, energy sources have become a permanent necessity of modern society, and consequently, a hotly debated issue. Since energy holds such a prominent role in the world, it affects political decisions, relationships between countries, the economy, and the environment; it has become the core of most day-to-day activities. Nuclear energy has come to the forefront of these sources because of its relative newness and seemingly limitless supply of energy. Congress debates proposals for funding nuclear energy because many believe that it is the technology for the future with the supply of oil becoming harder to control and solar and wind technologies not being expanded or fully developed. The benefits of nuclear energy
It is costly and dangerous, however there 's a chance to increase mass measures of vitality that could offer America some assistance with becoming substantially more vitality free. Currently, a lot of fracking locations have been banned but there are site that are still in practice site that are not close regulated. The publics focus needs to be on cutting down energy use to and trying to implement better way to extract energy while not causing harm to the environment. Although, banning or reducing fracking will be a damaging factor to any economical benefits that come with fracking. Recent studies have shown that many of the environmental effects usually attributed to fracking may come from other sources.
Depicted in Bethesda’s game series, Fallout, we see how our future plays out. They have cars, buses, and locomotives all powered by nuclear energy. What if I told you that this could become a reality? As oil prices go up and the looming danger of greenhouse gasses and global warming increases, many people are looking for an environmentally safe option to produce power without having to expel greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere. Some say that we should use hydroelectric power because we have a large amount of water.
As the world’s resources are consumed rapidly, energy companies look towards alternative forms of energy production. One form of controversial energy source that has been used for many years is nuclear energy. Canadians are one of the top ten countries in electricity consumption per year. We adopt lifestyles that are difficult to sustain, due to our energy inefficient devices and consumption habits. Nuclear energy is constantly promoted to be safe and economically beneficial, however, due to a negative public perception of nuclear energy and its anthropogenic risks, the development of nuclear power plants is difficult.
Nonrenewable and renewable energy both do contain the alike qualities that they are reliable forms of energy that are both needed today for not only transportation but also for industry, and in home use. However, in contrast to one another you can clearly perceive the differences of the two energy types and how they individually portray their own unique methods of achieving their energy. Since nonrenewable energy is toxic to our environment from its burning of fossil fuels, the fact it contains a limited amount of resources that will indefinitely run out in the near future, and the point that nonrenewable energy has the ability to be used as of today, all shows great amounts of indifference to its opposing energy type; renewable energy. Renewable energy is safe for our environment and will not cause any pollution to the atmosphere, it also contains materials that are unlimited which means we can use them without the worry of them becoming scarce, and finally, renewable energy will not be able to be fully achieved until future use when the proper technology and savings is acquired for us to take advantage of it. To conclude, one can infer that there are a multitude of reasons that one type of energy is a better use than the other, but despite
Several industrial restructuring programmes across industries were also initiated to further improve performance and they have had significant effects in the energy sector for several decades. However from a global perspective, the signing of the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 was suppose to usher in an era for the planet to tackle climate change, and we had high expectations to see the world transition from dirty, polluting fossils fuels to their low carbon alternatives but instead we witnessed a reverse scenario where global coal consumption continued to grow in the last decade than it did in the previous forty years. After decades of global energy consumption growth being driven by oil and natural gas, coal has grown in the last decade than oil did in the last 25 years and more than gas did in the last 22 years. Comparing this growth with low-carbon energy sources is more overwhelming as the growth in primary energy consumption from coal was eight times larger than for wind, solar, and nuclear energy
Nowadays, most daily activities of human beings rely on fossil fuels heavily such as transportation, lighting, heating and communication. However, many scientists and experts forecast that fossil fuel will be running out in by the next century. Therefore, before its exhaustion, an alternative energy, is necessary to be developed. Among all renewable energies, we will discuss the pros and cons of nuclear energy, solar energy and wind energy. To begin with, nuclear energy has several major advantages.
If there isn 't rain to fill the dam the Hydro generators can 't run. If there isn 't wind for the wind turbines it wont go. If its a cloudy day you can’t use solar power to heat up to make energy. As you can see its very inconsistent and unpredictable. It also takes more money to build these places non-fossil fuel plants rather than the traditional ones.
We, the people in the US, are particularly overflowing with coal. It 's very cheap to make and to use. Burning coal however, produces high amounts of greenhouse gases unlike nuclear power or natural gas. Chris Nelder, author and energy analyst, says that - “Part of the reason why we’ve failed to reach energy independence for the last many many decades is because economic growth goes hand in hand with energy consumption,” says Nelder. “And our economy runs on fossil fuels.