What are the ethics of animal testing? What is animal testing?: This is a phrase people have used for a very long, so animal testing refers to the experimentation carried out on living animals. Animal testing have been used throughout the history of biomedical research. The animals used includes “dogs, cats, ferrets, rabbits, pigs, sheep, monkeys, chimpanzees, and more”. The majority of animals being tested in labs (over 90 percent) are rats, mice, and birds. Animals are always used in different procedures, such as testing for new drugs to cure infecting diseases, toxicity testing where poisoning can be occurred, skin being burnt, damages done to the brain (implants in brain is also being testing on -> electrodes into brain), and many other …show more content…
Defining ethical: This relates to moral principles or knowledge with dealing with a certain situation. Moral relativism and the self interest theory will be used. And the WOK I will be using is emotion. Primary Knowledge Claim: Seeing that there is a big number of people accepting that it is acceptable to test on animals I think: I think it is ethically wrong to have animals being experimented for the betterment. 25 million animals are experimented on for biomedical researches, science education (dissecting heart, where animals are dead) and cosmetics (for mascaras and liquid liners), every year in the US. Rabbits are being tested on for shampoos and other products, which causes an irritation and are forced to have their eyelids helped open by clips. They can’t blink for multiple days until the test is over. 50% of the animals are killed by the Lethal dose test, which in this test you are able to find out what chemical is involved in the product. Ethical theories is comes in place: Moral Relativism: This is basically where the moral values are custom or convention that vary from culture to …show more content…
What are the ethics of animal testing? I think this question can only be answered by the list of issues and limitations of animal testing. Therefore, from my real life situation: Using animals for biomedical researches can be beneficial, but detrimental for the animals. In my opinion, I would like to say it is unethical. Biomedical researches have proven that it is unethical but have a scientific benefits, for us human beings. If this benefits the animals without many deaths of mices but this is simply ethical. A reasonable way of testing the products can be used in an artificial way. For example, Lush is using fake skin to test their products on. But this is another topic, since we are using cosmetics. But using fake skin can be considered. Compared to the scientific side of the point. It to somewhat ethical to experiment on animals. By this way, humans are getting a benefit for their health even though on the other side the animals are still suffering. In the positive side of animal experiment: animals are also used to check how their intelligences or behaviour works within the different species. The argument here is animal rights, to not let animals suffer due to human
Credibility Step: Much of the information I’m going to share with you today came from the PETA website, the book The Animal Ethics Reader by Susan Armstrong and Richard Botzler, and the article “Animal testing: is it worth it?” by Geoff Watts. II. Body A. (1st main point) The problem of animal experiments has become one of the central ethical dilemmas in the modern society, and some countries have even banned the practice due to its cruelty 1.
Gandhi once said, “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated”. Research shows that there is no point to animal testing as they make very poor test subjects. They are very different from humans, with size, shape and different body chemistry which means that the products that they are testing could work for the animals, but have bad effects on humans that could even cause death. Although testing on animals has contributed to many life saving cures and treatments, it is still cruel and inhumane because of the suffering that the animals go through, the failure of experiments and it is unethical. Some argue that animal testing doesn't harm the animals; however there is evidence that the animals
Animal testing has been involved in medical research for a long time, resulting in an improvement of human health. The benefits of animal testing for medical research outweigh the drawbacks. Although opponents argue that the drawbacks of animal testing outweigh the benefits because animal testing is cruel, in actuality, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks because it saves human lives and is an affordable option. Many opponents argue that one drawback of animal testing is cruelty. They state that animals are subject to dreadful conditions, in the sense that they are restricted from daily activities.
Commercial Test on Animals should be banned Have you ever wonder how are all products made? Have you taken the time to see what variety of shampoo, makeup, body wash, or other products are you using? Now a day many commercial products before being sold in a store, they should pass through some tests and some products should be tested on animals before being sold. If a product hasn't been tested, it's an experimental product, what if that product starts to develop an allergy or a serious condition that can affect drastically our body.
The practice of animal testing is a very debatable topic. “Each year, more than 100 million animals, including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds are killed in U.S. laboratories” (Experiments). “The term “animal testing” refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals” (About). There are numerous pros and cons of using animals in experiments for humans for our everyday needs. There is different pros for animal testing, including helping researchers to find drugs and treatments, help ensure the safety of drugs, there are no other testing alternatives, and it provides an opportunity to examine a complete life cycle.
Animals lives matter. Animals are an important aspect of life on earth. Animal testing can lead to animal extinction, decrease in certain species, and is all around not healthy for animals. Animals are tested on by cosmetic brands, household product brands and self care product and brands as well. Clorox, M.A.C Cosmetics, Johnson & Johnson, and many more popular brands test their products on animals.
Animal testing is cruel, unjust, and wasteful, and it needs to stop. It is used to test cosmetics, to gain scientific knowledge, and for tests in schools. The Humane Society states that animal testing is tests performed on live animals for basic biology, medicinal, safety, or health research. Even small procedures have the capabilities to cause the animal high stress or discomfort. Some animals are used in future experiments, but most are killed soon after the tests.
From difference perspective animals are the most suitable research subject. For utilitarianism, everybody get counted equally in the calculation of happy and painful consequences, happiness is not only related to the behavior of that parties, in this case is the suffering animals, but also involve everyone affected by this act, (Banner, 1968), The case for animal experiments is that they will produce such great benefits for humanity that it is morally acceptable to scarify the lives of a few animals, this is where support animal testing is morally
Animal experimentation is unacceptable because it is unethical. The article “Animal Experimentation” it states, “many people object to the use of animals in scientific studies because the animals are denied their freedom and often suffer serious injury and discomfort.” People disagree with animal experimentation because the animals do not have the freedom to choose. Animals cannot speak for themselves to tell whether or not they want to get tested on, because of this then the animals that are tested on suffer a lot of discomfort and injuries. Another reason why animal experimentation is unethical because it is unreliable.
Animal testing is not ok for so many reasons. The first I have to say is about the hardship and pain to the animals. Animals feel pain along with humans, so why do we test on them? What if a bunch of giant animals took you from your natural home, nearly starved you, then tested on you with weird equipment in someplace strange? Yeah, pretty awful.
First of all, the conduction of animal experimentation can be easily rejected because of the immorality and cruelty that comes with it. Every year at least 115 million animals die in laboratories due to animal testing (Taylor K., 2008) and the numbers are steadily increasing. The shocking statistic proves that it has come to a point where we should ask ourselves, is it really worth it? Animals, like humans, are living organisms that are sentient and are capable of suffering. Conducting these experiments only make animals seem like tools used for the progress of humanity, stripping away the factor that they possess the same right to life we abuse every day.
As well as with the recent advancement in technology, finding an alternative solution to animal testing is more possible than ever. First, it is important to understand first that questions regarding the ethics of animal testing have been around for a very long time. This means that societies have long recognized the moral questions involved. Scientists have noted that the first-ever known use of animals in testing dates from 500 B.C. during the time of ancient Greece.
A very good example of why we need to test on animals is the Thalidomide Disaster. In the 1950s-60s The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ran tests to determine if it was safe to use. The Thalidomide drug was given out to pregnant women to help cure morning sickness. Instead of helping, it killed many babies, and approximately 15,000 babies were born with limb defects. This drug was tested on animals, but all the necessary test were not ran to insure the safety of consumer.
Michele McKay explains that during animal testing ¨animals endure chemicals being dripped into their eyes, injected into their bodies, forced up their nostrils or forced down their throats.¨ It stands reason that many animals are hurt and kept on getting hurt until they die. Therefore scientist do not stop using the animal until they are useless, which is just cruel and inhumane. In the article titled The Cruelty of Lab Animal Testing it states that ¨there are more than 115 million dogs, cats, rabbits, monkeys, and other mammals that suffer and die each year¨. It proves that animal testing does kill more than hundreds of animals, and those animals should be out in the wild with their family.
Whether this is morally right or wrong, I will present both sides of the argument as well as my opinion. PROS OF ANIMAL TESTING Nearly every nobel Laureate in physiology or medicine since 1901 has relied on animal research. Animal testing has decreased heavily over the years, with not very necessary things like makeup. Without animal testing we wouldn't have the many of the surgerys that we can today such as hip replacement surgery, kidney transplants, heart transplants, or blood transfusions.