ipl-logo

Federalism Essay

1920 Words8 Pages

APPOINTMENT OF GOVERNORS AGAINST THE CONCEPT FEDERALISM Nitin Goklani & Tanwi Pareek Federalism is a political concept in which the sovereignty is constitutionally divided among the Union governing authority and its constituent political units in such a way that they are independent of each other in their own spheres and not subordinate to one another. Now what we see in India is that the constitution is not strictly Federal. According to various critiques, the Constitution has many features which portray that it is Federal with a strong union and the appointment of the governor is one such characteristic. The Governor is the Constitutional head of the state whose role is restricted to act upon the advice of the state cabinet. When we read …show more content…

For example between 1966 and 1977, Indira Gandhi imposed President 's rule 39 times in opposition-ruled states. In retaliation, the Janata Party government imposed President 's rule 11 times between 1977 and 1979 in Congress-ruled states. This is how the tussle goes on between the parties and there is no end to this war.4 Moreover, irrespective of the guidelines and recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission, the party in power at the Centre does not follow any uniform policy in regard to the appointment of the Governor. Former Union Law Minister in UPA Government, Sh. H.R Bharadwaj was sworn-in as Governor of Karnataka on June 29, 2009.5 Former Orissa CM, Shri Janaki Ballah Patnaik was sworn-in as Governor of Assam on December 11, 2009. He had served as CM of Orissa for two terms.6 Recently, Sh. Shiv Raj Patil was Sworn-in as Governor of Punjab on January 22, 2010.7 He was the Home Minister in UPA Government and resigned from this post after terrorist attack in Mumbai. M.O.H. Farook was sworn-in as the Governor of Jharkhand on January 22, 2010. He had served as Speaker of Punducherry from 1964 to 1967 and as Chief Minister from 1967-68, 1969-74 and 1985 to

Show More
Related

  • Analytical Essay 80 Of The Federalist Papers By Alexander Hamilton

    524 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalist Papers is a collection of 85 articles and essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution. Modern day use the Federalist Papers to interpret the Constitution to look at the intentions of the framers and ratifies. This has been used on issues ranging from the power of the federal government in foreign affairs. However, there has been issues regarding the interpretation of the articles. That it is a lot of opinion that comes from the authors.

    Read More

  • Essay On Anti Federalists

    642 Words  | 3 Pages

    Are you a Federalist or an Anti-Federalist? The proportional representation of the people and the government in the pursuit of equality and happiness is thoroughly explained through the Anti-Federalist party. Jackson Turner Main wrote, "to them, the man of 'federal principles' approved of 'federal measures,' which meant those that increased the weight and authority or extended the influence of the Confederation Congress." By stating this he intended to provide the explanation and root of the problem; the egos of both parties, especially federalists were a constant wall blocking the parties from a resolution The Anti-Federalists were composed of many differential elements.

    Read More

  • The Anti-Federalist No. 84

    392 Words  | 2 Pages

    I Agree… “The Federalist No. 84” and “The Anti-Federalist No.84”, both have their views on what should happen to our government. Whether it is to add a bill of rights or not, but I agree with the writer of “The Federalist No.84” because if the Constitution is adopted, then it will be our Bill of Rights, also based on other countries’ bill of rights then it may argue with a semblance of reason. Because I have read both sides of the discussion, I can see who is wrong and why.

    Read More

  • Anti Federalists Dbq Essay

    1155 Words  | 5 Pages

    During the ratification of the debate of Constitution of the United States, there were two groups that played a major role during the time. Federalists supported the ratification of the Constitution. They were mostly conservative wealthy landowners or former loyalists. Some of the well-known Federalist during this time were George Washington, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. Anti-Federalists on the other hand opposed the ratification of the constitution, and they were in favor of the Articles of Confederation since it was less government and the states still maintained their sovereignty.

    Read More

  • The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Federalist Papers

    436 Words  | 2 Pages

    When our country started its own government, there were many weaknesses at first that were needing to be discussed. Without certain attributes, there couldn’t be a strong, healthy government. There were many people that thought that the Constitution needed something to back it up and make it stronger. Therefore, the Federalist Papers, and the Letter to Massachusetts Legislature were created. These documents, ultimately, impacted the government’s decision on the revision of the Constitution.

    Read More

  • The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists

    99 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

    Read More

  • Federalists Argumentative Analysis

    1500 Words  | 6 Pages

    Before exploring whether the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists can be labelled as either liberal or republican, it must be noted that both sides often employed the rhetorique of the other as a way to strengthen their arguments. This also helped both sides win support for their arguments from their opposition. I posit that the Federalists were more republican in their beliefs while the Anti-Federalists were more liberal based on a closer exploration of the creation of a federated state, in which the main tenets of republicanism and liberalism were defended by the respective factions. An argument that encapsulates the idea of the Federalists having strong republican leanings would be their focus on collective rights over individual ones in the creation of a republic.

    Read More

  • Dictatorship In Texas

    597 Words  | 3 Pages

    There’s being a debate mainly informed by the fact that there is a agreement that the governor of Texas has less potential compared to the others governors from other states. And the debate is wether the governor of Texas needs more power or not. There is some people who think that the governor needs more power in order to be equal with the other states. Theres has been some people who believe that the governor should stay the way it is because they say that the Governor’s office in Texas is is considered to be extremely weak specially if they compared it with the other states.

    Read More

  • Democrats Vs Federalists Essay

    480 Words  | 2 Pages

    While the Federalists believe in rule by wealthy class, the Democratic-Republicans supported in rule by the common people. Both Federalists and Democratic-Republicans disregarded the idea of a monarchy. When the Constitution was created, and during the Constitutional Convention, the concept of a monarchy was requested by neither Federalists or Democratic-Republicans. Both of the creators of the 2 parties attended the Constitutional Convention, and they were considered part of the Founding Fathers. While there were many disagreements at the Constitutional Convention, the idea of a monarchy was not desired by any of the intelligent men at the convention.

    Read More

  • Essay On Sectionalism

    879 Words  | 4 Pages

    The definition of sectionalism is being loyal to one’s own region or area of the nation rather than the nation as a whole. Regional differences that went on for years were a big cause of the civil war in the United States, sectionalism being a big one. There was a division because of certain political, economic and social issues, all of those things were what contributed to the growth of sectionalism from 1800-1861, when the civil war started. The North and the South had completely different views especially when it came to the topic of slavery.

    Read More

  • The Federalist Papers

    701 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalist Papers are a series of eighty-five essays that were written in 1787-1788 to advocate for the ratification of the Constitution in the State of New York. This collection of essays is considered to be one of the greatest works of political philosophy that came from the United Sates. Even Jefferson, who was an anti-federalist, thought that they were "the best commentary on the principles of government, which ever was written. " Even though their current significance is undisputed, some disagree about the influence the papers had when it came to ratification.

    Read More

  • Factions And Federalist Essay No. 10

    562 Words  | 3 Pages

    Factions and Federalist Essay No. 10 The federalist papers were a series of 85 essays written to convince the citizens of New York to ratify the constitution. Federalist essay No.10, written by James Madison, discusses political factions and their effects. Madison’s definition of a faction is clearly stated in the essay.

    Read More

  • Fourth Branch Of Government Essay

    778 Words  | 4 Pages

    writing prompt #6: Explain why the media has been called the fourth branch of government. Include your opinion of whether this is an accurate portrayal. Media is considered the fourth branch of government, but why? Media influences lives on the daily and can influence governmental thoughts, opinions , and decisions as well. Because of this it could be used for or against the government.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Dual Federalism

    1106 Words  | 5 Pages

    Interactions amid the provinces and the federal government, from constitutional issues to the most irresistible topics bang up-to-date in the country, are indemnified beneath the umbrella of “Federalism”. Authorities are shared so that on some matters, the state governments are decision-holders, whereas on the other matters, national government grasps the autonomy. In last twenty-five years, the upsurge of federal fiats on both governments, local and state, has shifted the power amongst state and national governments. Now, the national government is beginning to have more governance over the state’s engagements.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay Federalism

    944 Words  | 4 Pages

    Federalism Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between federal government, state government and provinces government. While federalism has many benefits, among them is checks and balances between the federal and state government, thus reducing the chances of one party getting too powerful and abusing their power. Preventing one party from being too powerful and abusing their powers is a good thing. However, it comes with a price that federal and provinces (state and local) governments do not always see eye to eye and agree with each other, which turns into conflict.

    Read More

More about Federalism Essay

Open Document