Parent doesn’t need to worry about kids lunches, Kids can lose weight or obese, and how governors thinking that parent not giving kids healthy food. This is why the article is right about the school needing to keep healthy food for the
He also states that the government should allow the citizens to access their health care funds account to support his conclusion, that, people will be more responsible for their health if someone else isn 't paying for their health problems. However, Balko fails to to provide evidence for to support his claim. Even though the problem of obesity is important, the Shorthorn should not publish "What You Eat Is Your Business" because it poorly argued and not interesting. Radley Balko’s central claim is that the government should not interfere in public health and diet. According to him people have no incentive to maintain their health when public money funds health care.
As a committee we would like to formally disagree with his statement. Giving people rights and access to welfare does not automatically mean they are contributing to the problem of obesity. If the government decides someone is eligible for food stamps, it means someone recognized their need for assistance. If and when an American receives welfare benefits, they should be allowed to get what they need to get back on their feet and become a productive member of society. In efforts to counter this argument we reiterate, food stamp
The idea that “food deserts” are the leading cause of obesity is broad, complicated and somewhat paradoxical. For example, “food deserts can occur in a community when available and accessible stores fail to offer healthy, affordable food” (Source A). With the idea that food deserts are the leading cause of obesity, this broad idea states that obesity can be cured by throwing down more grocery stores and problem solved. However, as stated in source C, “We have stressed throughout the course of our work that simply plopping down a grocery store doesn't mean that these problems are instantly solved” (Source C). This counters the idea provided in source A because it opens up the idea that there are other causes to the epidemic.
Just because you spend a lot of money on anti-obesity, you just can't make people live the way you think is best for them. If that person doesn't want to work out or start eating their fruit and vegetables to stay healthy, that should be on them they should take that responsibility, you can't force them to live the life that they don't want. Having that issue in public isn't going to change how people eat and exercise just making them even lazier. If it were private, then people would have started to work out, eating fruits, etc. on their own and not because someone else wants to and that how it should
Looking at the nutritional information that proclaims a product is healthy hides the fact that it has no dietary value whatsoever. Following the expose documentary and report, the corporate giants hide crucial facts about food products that are vital to the buyer which harms their health. The food industry motivation is to increase their profit margins, but the consumer needs to worry about consumerism and its effect on their welfare. Consumers and government involvement For the American people their
Zinczenko strategically uses emotional pathos through his example of obesity in children. Children are innocent in tone, therefore helping him explain that they are innocent in spite of the manipulation of the fast food industry. The author presents the issue of the lack of nutrition information in fast food. He’s not dissing the fast food industry; rather, he is stating the problem at hand that should be taken care of. He sympathizes with the fact that he too was once a kid whose two daily meals were from typical fast food restaurants.
Food stamps are provided to help Americans who struggle with food insecurity. People that are not sure where there next meal is coming from are given help so they can get by in difficult times. Maine's Governor, Paul LePage has lobbied that food stamps should ban the purchasing of candy and sugary drinks. The purpose of food stamps is not violated by this restriction, candy and soda hardly count as a nutritious, filling meal. However this bill was shot down by the Federal Government, LePage's response was to threaten to scrap the food stamp program if these new regulations are not included.
“As a result of such solutions to food shortage emergencies, the poor countries will not learn to mend their ways, and will suffer progressively greater emergencies as their populations grow” (Hardin).Swift thinks since the poor are in poverty because they don't have any job opportunities, so they should mate like animals then they can sale there kids as food, so not only will they have food but also have a job. ”This food would likewise bring great custom to taverns; where the vintners will certainly be so prudent as to procure the best receipts for dressing it to
There are issues that come up when talking about these precise geographic are being affected the most without receiving the fair chance of having healthy meals to eat every night. Some people believe that there is no way that some geographies will tell you that you cannot receive the nutrients food one needs to have a healthy diet.There are various ways one can receive the sufficient healthy foods one needs, and it is nothing based on geographic or the color of your skin. “Pennsylvania passed a Fresh Food Financing Initiative, which offered grants and loans to supermarkets willing to open in distressed neighborhoods and helped smaller stores expand their supplies of fresh food.” (Gilligan). It states that food deserts are not existing as of now and it is not an issue anymore. In contrast, there is countless research on how people that live in these “food deserts” are being affected the most are low-income areas as of today.