The question of whether or not all Americans should have access to free healthcare has been debated over and over from both sides of the political aisle. Access to life-saving medications and procedures are necessary. However, nothing is truly free. I feel that is the problem that many critics of universal free healthcare struggle to overcome. Why should I invest in someone else's healthcare? This question is one that I have found difficulty in answering.
When discussing health care for all Americans, it is important to first define this type of healthcare. According to "Week 7: Health and Behavioral Health" by Dr. Gayle Mallinger, universal healthcare, "provides health care and financial protection to all citizens of a particular country"
…show more content…
One reason that I keep in mind is that one day I may be the person who desperately needs help paying for my healthcare needs or that it could be my future child or niece or neighbor. Health problems do not discriminate - most of us will have some type of serious health problem in our lives not simply because we did try hard to keep them away but because of genetics or just plain bad luck. In an article published in Psychology Today titled "Why Should I Pay For Anyone Else's Health Care? The Power of Survivor Bias" by Matthew J. Edlund M.D. "Approximately two-thirds of the risk of cancer and dementia is now considered to be the result of luck. For many years, medical teaching has been half of heart disease is related to family history. Is it right to blame people for accidents of fate? Should people try to switch their coronary prone parents before their birth?" (Edlund, 2017) The reality is that we never know when we are going to be the ones needed care and even the most financial prepared person who exercises and eats healthy foods could find themselves in a tough spot when it comes to paying for their care as costs pile on. If for no other reason, access to free healthcare for all citizens is the moral thing to
The nature of the current debate surrounding the implementation of universal healthcare in America is troubling because it is comprised almost entirely of pragmatic arguments void of concern for the principles behind the project. Before one asks how much a thing will cost, how it will be organized, or whether “the uninsured” will benefit, one should ask whether enacting universal healthcare is in keeping with the values and principles of the American experiment. In other words, is universal healthcare good for America? Universal healthcare is not good for America.
This would also stop medical bankruptcies, improve public health and reduce overall healthcare spending to name a few, (healthcare.procon.org, n.d.). The con argument is this results in socialism and is the individual’s responsibility, it’s not the governments role to secure healthcare and this would decrease the quality and availability of healthcare and increase debt and spending, (healthcare.procon.org,
but it also greatly reduces the administrative and non-medical waste that has no benefits to patients. Pursuit of profit and wealth should not be in a field that is meant to care for others; companies and corporations are maximizing on patients’ misfortunes and are therefore shortchanging the quality of care in order to get the most money. This was warned by Maimonides in 1190 AD when he said “Do not allow thirst for profit, ambition for renown, and admiration to interfere with my profession for these are the enemies of truth and can lead me astray in the great task of attending to the welfare of your creatures” (Nelson, Alan). Despite the fact that a single payer universal healthcare system is not advocated by any current presidential candidate, it is both morally and economically the most sound system.
Departing from the consumer advocacy group’s stance, I do believe that there should be changes and the recommendations should reflect that. Although the Affordable Care Act has had positive effects on the healthcare industry, bringing millions of consumers to the industry, it is severely flawed. The key predictions of the plan fell short, leading to problems that can only be solved with significant reform or repeal. Moreover, regulations that came alongside the plan are either too lenient or strict, leading to many more issues as well.
Why deny people care for their health? Overall the universal healthcare system would benefit the citizens of the United
Healthcare in the United States is in desperate need of reform. There are several rationales to further explain this proposition. As an illustration, the Declaration of Independence states our unalienable rights: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In other words, every individual should be entitled to healthcare as it preserves life and promotes the general welfare. The federal government should, therefore, enact a program of universal health to better protect and serve all of its citizens.
Single Payer health care is also much cheaper overall than the currently implemented or any previously implemented system in the United States. The inefficiencies and deprivation of human due to for-profit health care systems must come to an end, and a single payer system must be signed into law because many people have had and will have their lives abused and ruined by the current
Health care is essential for Americans despite pre-existing conditions, and a free market insurance program would allow citizens to received the health care that is so desperately needed. A universal health care system is a matter of human rights and would solve America’s problem of one sixth of the population being
One of the things i found a bit surprising and a little alarming is if a person is healthy and can 't exactly pay for insurance for affordability reason then they may not obtain health insurance all together, also if a person has a specific illness or disease they are practically forced to pay high prices for their medication and appointments and monthly premiums and in turn may not be able to provide food for their families because they have to decide to but medications and try to stay alive or buy food and try to survive. Both interviewees seemed frustrated disappointed with the inequality of the health care system and the rates associated with receiving care and health care insurance. Something i noticed between the two was that they both were extremely passionate on finding a way for the United States to receive some sort of universals health care system that was inexpensive but preferably free. When the topic of cost came about they seemed to give detailed experiences dealing with the health care system and how it wasn 't affordable to them and how there were times they couldn 't receive the needed care get the needed
The majority of American healthcare are the low income consumers, is a total of 55% who receive health insurance are through their employers and 32% receive health insurance through a government programs. Some of the Federal health care officers were aiming low-income consumers with new advertisements. For most of the
No one should have to go through that much pain. Boost the economy would be a benefit from everyone getting free coverage. Free health insurance gives sick and dying people what they need to get better. There should be no one just tossed to the side to die. People deserve the right to see what live is really like instead of dying of something so
Universal health care is a valuable service and should be available in all countries. In many countries millions of people suffer from not having access to healthcare they deserve or not being able to pay for the healthcare they need. In the states alone, an estimated 50 million people do not have insurance because of the inability to pay for it. Universal health care would be beneficial to all countries because it would not exclude anyone from getting the necessary help, it would prevent the insurance companies from denying care, and it would contribute to preventative care to take place.
There is proof and evidence that Americans citizens do not receive the healthcare that they need despite the fact that the U.S. spends more funds per individual on health care than compared to any other country. Individuals who are battling prolonged diseases such as, diabetes, high blood pressure, or heart disease does not get the established and actual treatment that they should. For example, these individuals should be receiving drug therapies or self-management services so that they can assist them more efficiently and help them control their conditions. This goes for every American citizens that is uninsured, insured, or under-insured. These problems that the individuals are facing are only worsen due to the fact of lack of coordination
To start off, basic health care should be free for everyone because it could save lives. On the Huffington Post website, Senator Bernie Sanders wrote an article called, ‘Health care is a Right, Not a Privilege.’ In the article he states,” More than 18,000 Americans die from preventable illnesses because they don’t get to a doctor when they should.” If everyone has free health care, less lives will be lost. More lives of young people would be saved.
This is so because, universal access to health will really do good to the world and it is a Necessity in order to reduce the level of discrimination experienced in terms of finances . Universal access to health will ensure that there will be access to equitable quality health care and will also give security to those who are financially incapable at the present to afford quality health care die to their financial status. Although this may be the case in the future, there will face challenges especially in implementing the regulations that would be set up in order to enable equal distribution of medical resource and