ipl-logo

Essay On Gross Negligence

1222 Words5 Pages

Thesis: Gross Negligence is not a State of Mind. No persons should be found guilty of a crime merely because he acted below the standard of the reasonable man. (FOR) In Criminal law by Card, Cross and Jones, the term mens rea is defined as “the state of mind expressly or impliedly required by the definition of the offence charged.” These ‘states of mind’ have routinely been understood to include “intention” and “recklessness”. Over time, there have been debates as to whether ‘negligence’ – a type of fault that carries a heavy criminal burden – is a state of mind. Here, we argue that negligence, particularly gross negligence, is not a state of mind, and contend that no persons should be found guilty of a crime because he acted below the standard of the reasonable man. Negligence is the taking of an “unreasonable risk”, though unwittingly, that the reasonable man would not take in the very situation. Gross negligence carries a higher degree of carelessness where “the defendant must fall far below the standard of a …show more content…

where there is no state of mind at all. The law’s intention is to create liability to criminal punishment only where there is a mental element. In Attorney General Reference no. 2 of 1999 , an incident where 7 train passengers died at the hands of the rail station company for their lack of ensuring safety procedures were put in place. The decision of this case was that a corporation couldn’t be convicted of gross negligence manslaughter in the absence of evidence, as gross negligence should not be a form of mens

Show More
Related

  • R. V. Saulte Ste Case Study

    1403 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Supreme Court “invalidated an absolute liability offence, under the section seven of the Charter. It was on the basis that it “could send a person to jail for driving with a suspended licence when that person is not have subjective fault (that is she did not know or was not aware of the risk that her licence was suspended). It went on to describe that “absolute liability offences offend the principle of fundamental justice by punishing the morally innocent, they will not violate section 7 of the Charter, unless they threaten the accused’s right to life, liberty and security of the person. The courts have upheld absolute liability offences that could not result in

    Read More

  • People Vs Knoller Case Study

    1150 Words  | 5 Pages

    When a second-degree murder gets a new trial built on a philosophy of implied malice, the court mishandles its decision by demanding that the suspect must be shown to know that there was a high chance of subsequent death to others from the behavior of the perpetrator. The new trial was settled because of the fault in grasping the term “implied malice. The combination of these components of implied malice makes the trial court’s explanation a flawed one, and therefore a new trial created on this definition is a misuse of choice. The case is remanded for reconsideration on the basis of this

    Read More

  • Geringer V. Wildhorn Ranch, Inc: Case Study

    419 Words  | 2 Pages

    The defendant’s paddleboats were defective when provided to the Geringers causing the defendants to be found negligent. The Geringers were found negligent because they chose to use paddleboats without proper life vest protection. Disposition: The court affirmed the owners of Wildhorn Ranch to have been negligent leading to the death of William and Jared Geringer.

    Read More

  • The Case Of Esther Summerson And The Criminal Code Of Canada

    984 Words  | 4 Pages

    A crime must also require an aspect of voluntariness for the act to be considered valid (Verdun-Jones, 2015, p. 48). In Martineau (1990) the Supreme Court ruled that S.7 of the Charter requires the “subjective foresight of the likelihood of death” as the minimum mens rea requirement for murder (Verdun-Jones, 2015, p.76). The case of Lucki (1955) solidified the fact that if a crime results from something that is outside of the hands of the accused they cannot be

    Read More

  • The Case Of Tomcik Vs. Ohio Department Of Rehabilitation And Corrections

    1253 Words  | 6 Pages

    In the case of Tomcik vs. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Janet Tomcik, the plaintiff, blamed the loss of her right breast on the fact that there was a major delay in her examination and treatment of her tumor. This could be known as nonfeasance negligence, which is the “failure to act when there is a duty to act,” (Pozgar, 2016). The corrections department, or in this case, the defendant, claimed that Tomcik`s cancer was already so developed, that her breast would have been removed regardless of when her official checkup and treatment took place. One stakeholder in this case is Janet Tomcik. She is the patient who not only lost her breast, but endured “physical pain, [and] emotional suffering,” (Tomcik, 1991).

    Read More

  • Oblique Intent In Common Law

    1956 Words  | 8 Pages

    What constitutes an intention to commit a criminal offence has been the focus of intense common law debate for more than three decades. Intention can be separated into two sub-sections: ‘direct intent’ and ‘oblique intent.’ The preponderance of murder cases deal with the concept of direct intent, and prove to be uncomplicated as the defendant embarks on a course of conduct to bring about a result which in fact occurs. When considering the concept of oblique intent, it is essential to look at the case of R v Woolin [1998] 1 WLR, alongside previous cases, to better understand how and why the appellate courts have developed the meaning of oblique intent. It is also important to note that in view of the uncertainty inherent in the judicial guidelines

    Read More

  • Essay On Double Indemnity

    1504 Words  | 7 Pages

    Neff Said: Mise-en-scene and Sound in Double Indemnity Film Noir is a genre filled with many interesting conventions. The films within Film Noir use narration, performance, lighting, and blocking in order to tell tales of murder, betrayal, and questionable morals.

    Read More

  • Due Process Model And Crime Control Model In The Criminal Justice System

    909 Words  | 4 Pages

    The principle in law that one is innocent until proven guilty has created much discourse. There are those who feel that the moment that one is arrested, there is reasonable belief that they committed the crime. However, there are those who feel that just as the principle states, one is, and should be taken as a victim and the outcome could be either way: guilty or not guilty. In fact, this argument is supported by the many cases of malicious prosecutions and mistaken identities.

    Read More

  • Inadvertent Recklessness Analysis

    927 Words  | 4 Pages

    It is possible to commit an act of indecency recklessly and it is shown in the judgment of two cases. In R v Mueller , the Court of Criminal Appeal affirmed Fitzgerald v Kennard and applied the reckless non-advertent concept to indecent assault. In this case, the appellant was charged with five counts of assault with act of indecency and was convicted of three counts. The complainant suffered from Asperger’s syndrome and schizophrenia.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Negligence In Nursing

    1399 Words  | 6 Pages

    Negligence: Negligence is conduct that falls below the standards of behaviour established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm. (Gayle, 2015) The core idea of negligence is that people should exercise reasonable care when they act by taking account of the potential harm that they might forcible cause harm to other people. (Fein man, M. 2011) Negligence can be defined as a failure to take reasonable care or steps to prevent loss or injury to another person.

    Read More

  • Mens Rea In R V Mohan

    1352 Words  | 6 Pages

    Mens rea is the element of a crime which alludes to what is known as the “guilty mind”. The case of R v Mohan [1976] QB 1 , the case dealing with the meaning of intention in the context of the offence of murder, James LJ clarified that intention meant ‘aim’ or ‘a decision to bring about a certain consequence’ whilst mens rea is generally related with motive what it more directly links to the notion of intention. There are two types of intention, direct intention and oblique intention .Oblique intention is difficult for a jury to infer and difficult for a prosecutor to prove. Defining mens rea of intention precisely is very difficult over the years.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Medical Negligence

    813 Words  | 4 Pages

    The term negligence defined by Baron Alderson negligence means: “Omission to do something which a reasonable man guided by that consideration which regulate conduct of human affairs would do, or doing something which a reasonable

    Read More

  • Omissions In Criminal Law

    2318 Words  | 10 Pages

    Introduction This question requires for an understanding on the rules and principles relating to criminal liability for an omission. As well as whether the rules and principles are too restrictive on individual freedom. In order to have an understanding of the rules and principles of omissions, one first must understand how criminal liability is imposed. For a person to be found guilty of a crime they must have both the mens rea and actus reus of the committed crime.

    Read More

  • Essay On Bad Decision

    1595 Words  | 7 Pages

    So making a bad decision is never fun. I’d like to think that most of us prefer not to make them but can’t help to sometimes because we think a bad decision isn’t that bad. It might even be a good one in the right mind set. The point of this paper being to reflect on a pass choice looking at it with the elements of critical thinking. My bad decision is one I think most are guilty of, waiting until the last minute on something important.

    Read More

  • Seven Elements Of Crime Essay

    447 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mens rea is criminal intent or a guilty state of mind and is the mental aspect of the crime being committed. This is limited to intentional or purposeful action or in action and is not an accident. The fifth element of the crime is causation (Bohm & Haley, 2011). Causation is a casual relationship between the legally forbidden harm and the actus reus. What this is to prevent people from having a delay or threat of criminal charges the rest of their life.

    Read More

More about Essay On Gross Negligence

Open Document