Zoo enclosures can only hold so many animals so this surplus of them makes the living conditions even worse. On the contrary, it is cool to see animals that you would not normally get the chance to see, but despite this, animals need to be well taken care of in a good environment. Animals should not be taken out of their home to become an attraction for people. They should be taken out of their home only to be helped and then
There should not be zoos. Thousand of animals every year struggle with the same problem, being locked up. Although this may seem like a questionable argument, this is a major problem in this world and it needs to be fixed now. In this essay there should not be zoos because they make animals unhealthy, they treat animals badly, and animals are better off in the wild.
“The animals of this world exist for their own reasons. They were not made for humans any more than black people were made for whites” - Alice Walker. Some of the animals that you see in zoos are not always born in captivity. They can be taken right out of the wild as well. Although zoos are fun to visit, animals should not be held in captivity because the breed can become overpopulated, they do not know how to survive on their own, and they are being abused.
Dear, Zoo Manager I oppose to animals being in zoos because if they were ever released they wouldn’t have the knowledge to hunt or get food for their cubs. Zoos just isolate animals in little exhibits and don’t treat animals fairly keeping them from their natural habitat. James Nolen said “Animals have a right to be free not stuck in cages being used for entertainment.”. Therefore, what he is referring to is that animals should not be used for any sorts of entertainment to amuse humans. They are just suffering and us humans don’t understand how training them to do things like that; it is difficult for them to learn those curtain moves.
Even though zoos try to give animals enough room to roam, fly, run, climb and swim, It doesn’t seem to be enough. Due to this, many larger animals have been seen not behaving as they would in their natural environment. Making their natural instincts become suppressed and even forgot over time. Large felines have been witnessed pacing back and forth within their lonely quarantine, parrots grooming themselves to the point that they begin
Many captive breeding centers put animals in small enclosures and take complete control over their lives. These animals lose all freedom that they would have had if they were still in the wild and in their own natural habitats. This has a negative impact on these animal as being in a controlled environment and not being able to roam freely causes animals unwanted stress and sometimes can even lead to depression. Furthermore, ‘ A 2015 study published in the Journal of Applied Ecology concluded that unless animals in the wild are protected, captive breeding won’t make a
If you love animals, then you should not want them to live like this. They need space to roam and live like they 're supposed to live in their own habitat. Every animal has a different habitat. People might think this is a good idea if they love animals, but it 's just not good for the animal or the owner who is keeping the pet. That’s why people should not own exotic animals.
When a person beats an animal, that animal has no clue what they did wrong, in most cases, they probably did nothing wrong, and they’re afraid of that person now. So they have to live in constant fear, and don’t get to enjoy the short life they’re given. Humans live longer than most of these animals, and no one should feel as if they have the right to control and waste that animal’s life by beating and killing them. They should get to live a happy
The first was “ animals deserve the same quality of life quality of life that humans have”I can 't imagine being trapped in a fake habitat in the same article they made an astonishing claim “ studies have found that stress in zoo animals is caused by either a lack of variety in their diet, lack of place for animals to hide, or relationship problems with their caretakers.” its not just an opinion at this point, there are facts backing my opinons up, no animal or human should be striped of their natual Right, with animals that happened to be living in their natural habitat. space space space space if you really think hard about humans keeping animals locked up this is all 4 of our entertainment this is so many there so ways that we could view animals, letting animals room in a bigger more natural place wouldn 't be a problem a study by National Geographic claims that zoos have been around since before 2 500 BC, and the first zoo in the United States open in 1874, Americans have been keeping animals captive for nearly 150 years I can definitely understand zoos opening in 1874 compared half the things happening back then to nowadays, we would never even think of doing how the things that they did as pretty much everything has evolved since 1874 I think so should the zoo the idea of zoos space space space. an article titled zoos not enemy to animals they claim there is a growing list of species that survive in the wild today because of significant efforts and contributions of zoos and aquariums in the article in the article they talked about how they are many institutions that are taking real action to save species through field studies, breeding and releasing programs, rescue programs, and public engagement.
Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.
He explains of the stress filled lives these animals endure for the pleasure of humans. The humans are not properly aware of the situations of these animals. They are consistently in cramped cages in farms, while human’s sense of morality towards farm animals has been nonexistent. Norcross’s conclusion does not argue against eating meat, but he justifies it to an extent. Norcross compares two distinctive creatures in his argument, and their comparison does not justify his point of view.
People say that if u test on the animals nobody would care if they died. The also say that it won’t harm the animals but it really does. Some people also say that animal testing is bad because of the danger you are putting the animals in. The animals are going extinct because of the testing.