Hindu Law and Succession of Hindu Males
Hindu males under the Indian Succession Act can be brought under two broad categories:
i. Testamentary succession
ii. Intestate succession
TESTAMENTARY SUCCESSION
Where a succession is governed by a testament or a will, it is called testamentary
succession. Under Hindu law, a Hindu male has the capability to make his will of his
property, in favor of anyone.3 In such a case the property after his death, will devolve on
any individual, effective under the Will.4 Where the will is invalid or cannot take effect
due to any reason, the property will devolve as per the laws of inheritance.5
INTESTATE SUCCESSION
Where a person dies, leaving behind some property, but no will or testament capable of
…show more content…
With respect to testamentary succession, it empowers
a Hindu male or female, to make a testamentary disposition of the totality of properties,
in favor of anyone, male or female.6 For male Hindu, who is a member of a Mitakshra
coparcenary, the capability to make a will extends to even an undivided share in the
Mitakshra coparcenary property.7
3 Mulla on succession law
4 Bhim singh v. rash bihari, AIR 1965 MP 234
5 Rashmi v. K Ashutosh, AIR 1972 Pat. 567
6 Raman Singh v. Bibi Jagir Kaur, AIR 1932 Pun. 234
7 Ghyan chand v. talbir singh & ors., AIR 1956 SC 45
The general principles of inheritance which are applicable in case of males8, give
statutory form to certain well-established Hindu law norms, which are deeply entrenched
in the society. As a general rule, full blood male Hindus are accorded a preferential
Upon a Hindu male's death, the right of succession first devolves upon the Class 1 heirs,
if any. If there are several Class 1 heirs, then, there are some very sound and certain rules
as to how they will share the properties amongst themselves.10 The wife, mother
In both forms of property ownership, each spouse will hold a half interest in the home with a value of $225,000 and a basis of $150,000. When one spouse dies holding this interest, the other will receive the entire interest with a higher basis. When the property is held as joint tenants, only the half that is held by the deceased spouse will receive a “step-up” in basis. This will leave the surviving spouse with property with a value of $450,000 and a tax basis of $375,000. When the property is held as community property, the entire property will receive a step-up in basis as
Instead, list specific beneficiaries such as alternate beneficiaries or residuary beneficiaries. Estate planning is difficult and there is no reason to make it more difficult. So, keep your beneficiary pool to a precious few and specifically list each beneficiary. In the end, nothing will be left to interpretation and your property will transfer
Answer: if someone passes away and they do not have a will, their estate will enter intestate procedures. Each state has different procedures for handling assets these assets, but the fundamentals are technically the same. Within most states a percentage of the assets (ranging from half to two thirds) will go to the deceased children, with the remaining going to the spouse. If one of the parties mentioned above are non-applicable, the assets would shift fully to the applicable party. Complication may arise is there are no children or spouse alive.
Oftentimes, grief can be a challenging thing to overcome as a healthcare provider. It not only stymies people from making sound decisions, but it can end up with blame focused in areas where it should not be. This is with particular regard to patient families. In the case of this 72-year-old patient, there are a number of issues in this situation that are both unethical and downright illegal, including the fact that the patient’s living will is not currently being respected. Legal/Ethical issue 1: The legality of the living will parameters Both the legal and ethical issues of this situation have the do with the legality of the living will.
Gandhi once said, “An eye-for-an-eye makes the whole world blind.” What he meant is that fighting violence with violence helped no one. During his lifetime, Gandhi fought against oppressive British rule in India, and his journey was known throughout the world. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela both shared Gandhi’s thirst for freedom, basing their respective movements for peace on Gandhi’s. All three men fought peacefully for equality, whether it was for India’s freedom from the British empire, emancipation from apartheid laws that prohibited black Africans from being truly free, or liberation from Jim Crow laws to keep black Americans inferior to whites.
The living will protects a person’s predetermined choices relating to how their physician carries out their health care or end-of-life care in the event that they become unconscious or mentally incapable. Write your living
The Indian Act of 1876 determined who was, and who was not, a legally-entitled Indian. According to the Act, the term “Indian” meant: first, any male person of Indian blood reputed to belong to a particular band; second, any child of such person; and third, any woman who is or was lawfully married to such person. Under this definition, it is evident that the foundation of the Act – the Indian status – blatantly discriminated on the basis of gender. According to the Act, Indian women, who may have had Indian ancestry dating back thousands of years, were suddenly only deemed an Indian because of their husbands or fathers, rather than in their own
These laws were “The name of the racial caste system operated primarily, but not exclusively
An effective government system protects the rights of its people and keeps its citizens safe from harm. The purpose of the government is to protect its citizens by securing the safety of them, and by providing for citizen 's needs. While other concerns, such as the economy and a less intrusive government may be present, a government 's duty is to provide for and protect its citizens. Without people 's concerns for how their needs will be provided or how they will be protected from a threat, the citizens will be able to live with a sense of security.
There are many different societies in our world today, and each of these communities treat and group their people differently. While some places, like the United States, do not have set groups, others, like India, have very strict laws about what each class can and cannot do. The Caste system in India is a great example of how one society strictly groups their members. The Caste system is a class structure that is determined at birth.
If a man came from a wealthy family, he had the chance to have several wives. However, they all had to have their own household or “tipi.” The woman would never be left unprotected regardless of the husband’s death or infidelity. If the husband died, his wife had a choice of remarrying the husband’s brother whereas, if the woman divorced her husband, she will be taken care of by her family and he would lose his position in the clan.
HRT 3M1a- Grade 11 Religion CPT Part A: Annotated Bibliography Chapple, Christopher Key. " Hinduism and ecology. " Tikkun, Mar.-Apr. 2005, p. 32.
Fundamentally, idolatry is the worship of an image or object or the excessive devotion towards a person or item. From a religious perspective, idolatry is the worship of images and representations other than the true God. Idolatry is a practice whose scope is often misunderstood, prompting the efforts by different people to demystify the practice both in the past and in the world today. Martin Luther, for instance, explores his understanding of the practice in his Large Catechism, a text meant to guide Lutheran clergymen in their service. This essay discusses idolatry, with specific emphasis on Luther’s ideas and presentation of the same and its prevalence in the modern world.
Some might argue that India’s Caste system is closely related to However, Caste and social hierarchy were more different because Caste happens over different lifetimes, and social hierarchy can happen over one. In the caste system people could move their position in their current life, however they could have moved up or down depending on how they acted in their last life. In the Social hierarchy, men could move up or down depending on whom they married, however women could not move throughout the chain. “Women were generally seen as inferior to men, dominated by their bodies rather than their minds.” (McKay pg
Introduction In India, discriminatory attitude towards men and women have existed for generations and thus it affect the lives of both genders. Although the constitution of India has granted men and women equal rights, but gender gap still remains. Female discrimination violates human rights. These are mostly seen in family land sharing among sisters and brothers.