Can gun control laws reduce the amount of gun violence? The clear answer is yes. First, the suicide rate will lower if we pass more gun control laws. Next, making people undergo background checks before owning a gun will help lessen the risk of a firearm ending up in the hands of a criminal or a person with mental illness. Third, there will be more gun deaths
You don’t want your firearm to not be able to be used to its maximum strength at a time if someone was to try to harm you, you would want it to be able to be used at its maximum strength to be able to protect you from harm. I understand that if everybody had a firearm it would raise the murder rate tremendously, but one must admit should be a little harder to get a gun, just cause you don’t have a criminal background does not mean you are not capable of doing the same actions a criminal. The gun control law should be made to where if you wanted to purchase a firearm, that you
There have been so many gun incidents in the this world ours , we still don’t have a type of law for gun control policies, and there should be. There are about 100,000 Americans killed each year by guns. If the Congress could just lay some type of control on guns right now, we can save many lives from being in danger, stop all the school shootings, and have a better, more safe life. Gun policies can help lower crime rate and stop children and irresponsible adults from getting guns. Having a gun control laws can help save more lives in this world and stop having families suffer in pain because a mental man had killed a member that belongs to their family.
As for suicide rates, there have been 21,175 firearm suicides, almost all being comitted with a household gun or a relative's gun. Not only that, but firearm suicide is one of the most common ways of suicide across the United States. Even more, data from 2012 showed that 64% of gun deaths were suicides, different than the 2006 data that showed the decrease (57%). However, gun control is not able to decrease firearm suicide. If gun control were to be stricter, there still wouldn't be any control over a persons decisions, unless firearms would be completly out of reach for citizens.
Gun control will prevent more mass shootings, like it did in Australia and the United Kingdom, reduce murders drastically, as seen in other countries, and kill off donations to politicians, removing the political influence of guns. As stated, based off the evidence of research, it is believed that gun control will prevent mass shootings in America, on a rapid scale. According
But when there’s a gun, it really makes it so much more likely that something terrible will happen” (Hemenway). This shows how guns can really threaten and endanger others lives in so many ways, and if we could make the gun laws stricter then, the amount of violence will be reduced by many. Overall, gun laws should be stricter to keep everyone safe and away from gun violence. Secondly, we should have stronger background checks for guns. Having
Guns that hold more ammunition have more shots that could result in more kills. For example, when perpetrators use high capacity magazines or assault weapons, it results in 47% more deaths (Everytown Research). Not allowing these high powering magazines to be sold or having higher regulations to who they are sold to, can decrease mass shootings. This would result in a safer environment. Similarly, bettering the control of who the guns are being sold to would prevent the guns from getting in the hands of the wrong people.
“As things now stand, deadly weapons are easily accessible, studies about the causes of gun violence are prohibited, and the super-political gun industry profits from death.”Some people profit from the gun, some occupations such as killers, spies, and some more terrorists, do anything they can to get the goal. Some common people who may be victims of gun violence, their families or themselves may have been hurt. Because firearms are too easy to obtain at this time and are collected at this time so that gun violence can easily take place. We should ban the sale of firearms. “Too many criminals purchase guns legally and use them to commit crimes.”Terrorists will be difficult to collect large quantities of firearms if it is banned from selling their firearms, and it is also very hard to launch an attack.
There is an old saying that “guns do not kill people, people kill people’’ which means that shooters need to be stopped. However, the most effective way to combat deadly violence in school is to restrict access to guns. Furthermore, in order to decrease the number of mass shootings, Americans have to tackle the issue of gun control and what should be the legal requirements for citizens to bear arms. The right to bears arms should include a minimum age requirement in order to protect the innocent children who are the victims of mass shooting in schools across America. The Constitution of the United States Second Amendment reads as follows: "A well-regulated
Recent studies found that the most effective way of reducing gun crime is to lower the amount of guns available in circulation. In the US specifically, studies show that the stricter gun laws are in a state, the lower the amount of deaths related to guns occur (Graham). While many believe that further restrictions on guns would not be feasible, both Australia and the United Kingdom managed to highly restrict or ban guns from their nations in order to reduce gun-related deaths and crime (Graham). Australia was able to rid the country of around 650,000 guns and their rate of robberies per 100,000 people sank from about 100 to 60 (cite later 1). This program of complete gun confiscation costed Australia $230 million.