Should illegal wildlife trading be continued in South East Asia?
If you have ever visited Southeast Asia at least once in your life, you will probably remember visiting a zoo or a Safari Park to watch all the tropical animals in a very cheap price. South East Asia has almost 64% of the entire world’s wildlife population. Wildlife use is one of the biggest income South East Asia countries including Thailand get from foreign countries. Wild life is used in various businesses such as Zoos and wildlife exhibitions to even private pet sales in a small portion. However, the reason why South East Asian countries can provide this to tourists in a cheap price is because of how they import wild life illegally from abroad. Dealers, business owners,
…show more content…
Because of the huge amount of illegal wildlife trade that's been going on inside and outside of one’s country. Almost every South East Asia countries government’s spend more money than any other regions on protecting wildlife (WWF Trafficking). At this point, some might argue that illegal wildlife trade can leave a huge impact of loss on the government’s boundaries and tax that innocent citizens are responsible for. Therefore, causes massive economic loss to countries that engage in illegal wildlife trade. While this can be partially true, we should be informed about the bigger benefit on the other side. Illegal wildlife trading can bring more benefits than loss in any country’s economic. A big portion of the poor, who are more than half of the entire population of South East Asia, directly depend on trading wildlife as a way of earning cash because Illegal wildlife trade is the third most valuable commerce behind drugs and technical arms (nature.com.Anjali Nayar). Further more, extreme poor regard wildlife as a means to meet their own needs and often use trade them not only for sale, but also as a good resource of food. Since recently the poor population around South East Asia countries are struggling with growing human populations and unsustainable profit from harvesting crops. And in this case, for many people, wildlife is an important source of …show more content…
South East Asia has always been together with the nature and with supplements that are found in wildlife. East Asian medicines use parts and derivatives from more than 1000 plant and animal species including tiger bone, bear gall bladder, pangolin scales.. Additionally, many wildlife species are as well collected by museums and private individuals and therefore a huge number of tourists in South east Asia visit to purchase wildlife. Illegal wildlife trade meets both the suppliers and the customers demand in a cheap easy
The breeders just make money off of animals and they don't even have to keep them in that good of conditions. Also what is the point of getting exotic animals? Like tiger, bears and big ones like that. It is unfair and unsafe for the animals I don't see why people can buy animals that need a lot of space but they give them like none. There needs to be a way to guarantee animal's space.
Exotic animals are dangerous in most cases, but people can own them if there areas to keep them in and have some responsibility. It is legal if somebody wanted to own a wolf they could buy one in some places, but with a license and secured fences to keep them in to have more protection. The commentary “Let People Own Exotic Animals” by Zuzana Kukol, and the Article “When Wild Pets Get too Wild, Wolf Run Offers a Home Where They Can Roam” all support owning exotic animals as pets. People should own exotic animals under these rules and still be safe, it is our right. United States is a free country where there are rights for the citizens, so whoever owns these animals it is their concern.
In an effort to ensure effective comprehension and validity, it is important to rely on credible sources and avoid making unsubstantiated claims. Finally, all messages should include a clear call to action, encouraging the audience to take specific steps to support conservation efforts. Providing practical suggestions for ways that individuals can get involved, such as volunteering or making a donation, can help to increase engagement and mobilize action. By using this writing knowledge and skills, members of the wildlife protection community can help to inspire others to take action and
Hunting permits cost money. The money raises depending on the size of the game and location. People will bid thousand close to millions just to go hunt a trophy animal as stated on The Rhino Hunter, “paid $350,000 for a hunting trip to Namibia to shoot and kill an endangered species”. Yes sometimes they do go hunt endangered species but what people don’t know is they go hunt the older animals, the animals that bring danger to the rest of the species. These bids all the money that
For example, they capture animals in the wild so that they can be put in there own zoos. in 2006, a zoo imported 33 monkeys who had been illegally trafficked by poachers in Africa (Smith). This means that animals Are being taken away from there natural habitat just so they can be put in zoos. Additionally, animals are not usually released back into the wild. Animals in zoos are released back into the wild only 26% of the time (Lin).
Zoos Should Be Banned Imagine you are five years old, someone breaks into your home, kills your aunt and possibly your older brother in the process of kidnapping you. You are separated from your loved ones, leaving your mother in severe pain and grief. You are taken somewhere unknown, imprisoned in a cell where people come watch you for their own entertainment.
Only when the last of the animal’s horns, tusks, skin and bones are sold, will Mankind realize that money can never buy back our wildlife” - Paul Oxton Poaching is a big problem all over the world and results in many species of animals becoming endangered. To try and protect some of the more endangered animals like the Rhino, game rangers have tried surgical removal of the animal’s horn to make the rhino useless to poachers. The removal of animals’ horns to protect them against poachers is not the most effective anti-poaching solution. This essay will show why the removal of the animal’s horn is not a good solution by showing the negative effects of removing the horn, the cost of removing the horn, what is done with the horns and how the removal of the horn has reduced poaching. Animals like Rhinos are poached for their horns as they are used for medicinal purposes and jewelry.
Many people have memories of visiting The Zoo as a child. Watching the gorillas, tigers and many other animals was a long awaited thrill. Feeding the giraffes caused one to jump up and down with excitement; now, picture all this suddenly disappearing. What if all this thrill and excitement were to be confined to just an image searched on the Internet, just because such animals became extinct? Unfortunately, this picture might not be far from becoming our reality.
The childhood dream of owning a pet monkey or tiger is a common one, but that’s all that owning an exotic animal should be: a dream. Over 10,000 exotic animals are trafficked into the United States each year, a multi-million-dollar industry on the black market. Owning a wild animal may seem fun and exciting, but with the ownership of such a creature, dangerous consequences follow. The ownership of an exotic animal not only puts the owner 's life at risk, but the animal 's and the environments. There is a common theme among people that it 's humanity 's responsibility to preserve the world we live in, yet there are more tigers in captivity than there are in the wild.
Many illegal hunters do it for the money that it brings in the long run. The selling of illegal animal products around the world is somewhere in the high millions if not billions. Some do it for the ‘thrill’ or ‘fun’ involved in it, and others
Lion: 85% of historic range lost. Grevy’s Zebra: Approximately 2,000 remain. ”(“But illegal poaching might destroy it forever”). The animals that are being killed are usually only killed for one body part, sometimes they occasionally kill the animal for more than one body part but most of the time they kill for tusks, bones or fur they are usually sold and sold for large amounts of money which is illegal. Many people believe a rhino's horn cures hangover, fevers and even cancer but none of those have ever been proven.
People use the elephants tusks to make jewelry, and ornaments. China is a big consumer of elephant tusks. They banned this illegal poaching and let some of the elephant populations grow back. But some people still poached these animals which kept them in the endangered list. These animals have a protection program which bans people from poaching these animals.
On the other hand, certain animals can produce “low-cost, high quality food for humans” (Tripp 24). A fact such as that can help impoverished countries that lack a steady source to provide nourishment. Without the improvement
Poaching is defined as illegally capturing, injuring, or killing an animal that is not on your land. The motive to commit this crime over the years has shifted from simply from individuals illegally hunting game to large organizations slaughtering animals to gain profit. Many are aware of this issue, but underestimate the sheer enormity of it. According to The Fish and Wildlife Service, there is an estimated $15-20 billion global market generated from poaching and trafficking of animals and their body parts. They have also reported that over 8,000 endangered species do not receive any federal protection.
Then there is another monitory value attached to it, the making of jewellery and other ornaments. Now the question rises, is it then acceptable based on these reasons for these societies to have access to Rhino horn? Human’s desires has led to the tragedy of commons. South Africa faces challenges in this regard such as high unemployment, corruption and inequality that is continuing to increase, all of which makes it somehow logical for these perpetrators to poach Rhinos of their horns, sell it and gain profit.