The accounts of colonial states present an interesting view of the colonial paradigm of various nations, and none paint a more vivid picture than the colonial era of India. The colonial era of India, which spanned for nearly a century, manifests in great detail the ten tenets on which the very idea of colonialism is based on. Colonialism, as an endeavour, cannot sustain on its own, and as such it is very important to systematically study the cornerstones on which the very idea of colonialism is built on.
The colonizers came in India with the purpose of making profits by engaging in trade and commercial practices. An English East India Company- to trade with the East-was established in 1600. Even Queen Elizabeth (1588-1603) was one of the shareholders on the company. Competing with
…show more content…
But the Indian economy was transferred into a colonial economy whose nature and structure were determined by the needs of the British economy. High revenue demands and the rigid manner of its collection led to the impoverishment of peasantry and they went into debt-trap. The growing commercialization of agriculture also profited the moneylender-cum-merchant. The deprived peasant cultivator was forced to sell his produce just after the harvest to the merchant, at whatever price he could get, as he had to meet the demands of the Government, the landlord and the moneylender. Indian agriculture began to deteriorate, resulting in extremely low yields per acre. The peasant was too poor and had no incentive to improve agriculture. Landlords would rather squeeze in more rent than invest in improvement of agriculture. No modern technology was introduced in this field and the government refused to take any responsibility. Rural population was continuously plagued by famines as majority of cultivators lived at starvation
The peasants became very resentful. Many small farmers went out of business which caused the number of crops to decline. The Republic ceased to expand, however economic progress soon ceased. If the republic continued
The British improved and modernized India which formed their efficiency that they have today. They established railroads and bridges so people can travel thru their country easier. The British also ingrained a fair trading system between India and British. Some may claim that it was not fair because the Indian textiles were getting sold less and less. From 1790 and so on the sales of Indian textiles progressively declined (Doc. 6).
Before the BEIC, India was one of the wealthiest countries globally. Indian products like spices, textiles, and the country’s precious stones were highly desired, giving them a major role in trade. Once the BEIC took control, India’s wealth diminished greatly. The British put in place taxes on wealthy landowners and on “the trade of all fine and valuable merchandise.” (Document 9)
Most of the governmental systems didn’t help the indians in fact the things Britain put into place for india only made india profitable for britain. While the British believed that they helped India by setting up a government and military system India disagreed. In fact, they believed that britain caused problems in the Indian way of life. An example of this is british imperial rule established the framework for India 's justice system (Lalvani).
Out of everything that changed agriculture, the increasing economic difficulty was arguably the most powerful. With so many farms, the amount of produce rose while the prices of produce fell, in some cases, like with Cotton, prices fell over ⅛ of the original price (Doc A). Because of the extremely low prices, as low as 10 cents in some places, some farmers did not make enough to survive and promptly went out of business. Even with groups like the the Farmer's Alliance defending smaller farmers by pooling together resources and money in
The farmers felt that they were paying more and more to take loans and borrow money, to buy farming necessities and to sell their crops. The prices that had for the crops was degrading dramatically.
In the 1500’s England broke away from the Roman Catholic Church and formed its own church called the Church of England. However, the Pilgrims didn’t want to follow the new church. As a result, they were persecuted and harassed by followers of the new Church of England. For this reason, the Pilgrims and Puritans came specifically to America to practice their religious beliefs and to spread the gospel. The Pilgrims were a group of Puritans (English Protestants) who wanted to escape religious persecution in England.
India was dominant towards the cotton textile industry trade, which motivated England to take the opportunity of forcibly removing all indigenous competition: “...the British who most fully took advantage of the collapse of the empire. Between 1757 and 1803, they took control of most of India except the Northwest. The result was that the East India Company now administered major sectors of the economy, and quickly reduced the role of the big Indian bankers by changes in taxes and methods of collecting them. ”(Mukherjee) By eliminating any further competition at their weakest moment, England lowered India’s economy and chances of industrializing.
Also with the farmers using machines to produce crops, there was an overabundance of crops that they couldn't sell. This put farmers into debt and ultimately they lost their
This wealth disparity was mainly due to the fact that farmers had no control
Populists faced many problems in the economy, these problems affected the farmers financially and economically. Consequently,
Early colonial experiences had a tremendous affect on the founder’s view about rights and limited self-government. Accordingly, Thomas Jefferson explained, “ Every man and every body of men on earth possess the right of self government. Jefferson’s view defined the belief of many of the colonists, that government must be representative of the people. In order to be self-governed, the people agreed to charters and developed compacts including: the Mayflower Compact, and the Orders of Connecticut.
They tried to increase productivity by buying machines like tractors. One unintended consequence was that this mechanization became too efficient, so that fewer farmers were required. Crop supplies soared, and prices dropped. For example, cotton prices dropped by two thirds, and cattle prices by half. Small farmers became increasingly in debt as they were pushed off their land and big agribusiness dominated.
Dr.Lalvani claims that under British rule, India was modernized, giving the foundation for a government that therefore gave law and order. While this system and others were built, they were built almost entirely for British benefit and even profit. In this new government, Indians had no say in the laws being decided by the British, that were impacting them. The laws were meant to further control Indians, while the British extracted India’s wealth and flood India’s markets with textiles with the help of railroads. Wanting more and more wealth, the British logged forests to create land to grow cash crops which in the end degraded the soil making it more difficult for them to grow.
Which the farmers were not making any expense, so they grew more crops than before, and that made things worse. In which it led farmers into a big debt and problems. One of them was the tariff policies during the Gilded Age. Farmers were the victims and were forced to buy manufactured goods to be protected by tariff legislation. But what they produce was not protective and more competitive markets soon to rise of over supplies and foreign competition.