The prohibition of pets in public housing estates for health concerns has always been a constant issue. As many types of pet are allowed in public housing estate, this essay will focus specifically on dogs. First and foremost, the purpose of building public housing estate is to satisfy those who cannot carry the financial burden of private or Home Ownership Scheme housing estate. It is well-known that the public housing estate is densely populated with limited public and unit space. Keeping dogs brings negative effect towards environment or neighbours for their barking problem. Keeping dogs in public housing estate should be prohibited due to protect the rights of residents and ensure the rights of dogs.
First of all, keeping dogs disturb the environment of the public housing estate. It is elementary in a dog’s world that they may treat their owner as the most important thing. They probably do not have a sense that barking and urination will affect the living habits of other residents. Society for the Prevention of
…show more content…
However, the major difference is the density, size, and environment of the living units when compared to the situation of Hong Kong. Moreover, cruel methods are used to stop the barking problem of dogs in those countries – wearing off the sound collar or cutting their vocal cords. As a result, these practices totally deprive the freedom of dogs and violate the point of safeguarding the rights of them.
In conclusion, after considering diversified perspectives, dogs should not be allowed in public housing estate in order to protect the right of both residents and dogs themselves. Therefore, the feasibility of keeping dogs in Hong Kong public housing estate can be pended for further discussion from the aspects of the ethic
The New York Times wrote an article called “A Breed That Came up the Hard Way” were it stated that because of their unparalleled love and devotion for children they were commonly known as “The Nanny Dog” throughout the late 19th and early centuries. (Fletcher,W 1971). Meanwhile advocates for this breed claim this specific breed is the most abused, tortured and abandoned breed in the U.S. They’re often difficult to adopt out due to their stigma caused by the media. The ASPCA revealed that there is no evidence that shows how breed-specific laws make communities safer for people or companion animals, these laws are costly and extremely difficult to enforce.
Truly, hereditary qualities plays an expansive part in a mutts conduct, however despite the fact that pooches have been reared for some, extraordinary occupations, they were essentially reproduced for human friendship. Subsequently, they have to feel a similar love and sympathy they give their proprietors. Not exclusively do puppy should be treated with adoration they additionally should be prepared keeping in mind the end goal to set up guidelines and limits. An enormous oversight made by pet proprietors is accepting that pooches know the contrast amongst good and bad.
As we all know, usually the apartments come with a very small and private yard space. The space is too limited for residents pets tho exersize and run around. Laws of the city creates even more limitations by asking that the dog is on a leash in public ares. Because
It also was great support to his argument. Manjoo explains that both dogs and his son don’t act in a socially acceptable way. He loves his son and despises dogs and touches on how people get more annoyed with the parent of a misbehaving child than the owner of a misbehaving dog. His point in this comparison is to prove that he makes an effort not to disturb those around him while proving himself not impartial.
I think that only service dogs should he allowed in public places. Service dogs are better because they don’t carry disease and if other service animals can make a mess. The new law make people safe. They will have consequence and be injuries because of the other service animals. The new law will make people be safe.
If dogs were allowed in the workplace they could cause a lot of problems. Ask a dog owner if they agree if dogs should be allowed in the workplace everyday. If we allow dogs in the workplace everyone who is allergic or have allergies would not be able to work there. Do our workplaces need your dogs or anyones dogs fur on the carpet or anywhere else so janitors have a harder job cleaning.
When I was visiting India during the scorching summer at the age of seven, I noticed an increasing amount of stray dogs wandering aimlessly in unsanitary alleyways and on the perilous highways in the overpopulated city of New Delhi. Because I
Contrary to popular belief, a service animal isn’t just seeing eye dogs. They also are not a pet and shouldn’t be treated like one. “Service animals are defined as dogs that are individually trained to do work or perform tasks for people with disabilities” (“ADA Requirements”, 2011). These animals go through many hours of training so that a person
Many are not aware of the problems that using a fake service dog can cause, but those who are disabled understand the issue. This has been a problem for many years, and is only getting worse. Fake service dogs reflect a bad image for the real ones, and “discriminate against or restrict access to disabled persons” (Colman). The recurring problem of these fake service dogs is well known to such a small percentage of the population, it is difficult to create a stable solution that will be effective for a long period of time.
Choosing a cat or a dog as a pet is depending on personal preference or purpose. Both animals can become a good companion in human’s life. In an essay titled “Why Cats Make Better Pets Than Dogs” Sean Curtis argues that cats are better pets than dogs because cats are low maintenance, quiet, and independent. He helps readers gain insights of a cat or a dog’s behaviors and habits, and bring awareness of their issues to a future cat or dog owner. This essay argues clearly with his points of view and successfully bring readers’ attention to dogs’ problems that a dog owner will meet and solve.
Justice for Dogs Have you ever seen a dog alone in the streets? And you want to pick them up and drop them off to the shelter but don’t have the time? Rather than picking up the dogs and dropping them off, you can help the poor animals from the very beginning. The little things like adopting a dog rather than buy a dog makes a huge difference.
With the recent happening in Penang, Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng has ordered that all stray dogs shall be put to sleep so that the people will not contract the rabies virus if they are bitten by the strays. However, many people including the non-governmental organisations formed by animal lovers had opposed this action. Some people deemed him as being cruel, while some see his action justifiable. Although his order may seem inhumane, but his intention is good. He wanted greater good for his people and thus he has no other way but to contain the spread of this virus by killing.
Imagine coming home after a tough day and being greeted at the door by your furry four-legged friend wrapping itself around your legs with a smile from ear to ear. There is no doubt that pets bring about bundles of joy, but dogs also provide stress relief, motivation to get active, lessons on responsibility, as well as another reason to smile on a daily basis. We all want the best for our kids; it is obvious that owning a dog has never-ending positive impacts on a child’s life. Owning a dog reduces stress, teaches responsibility, encourages exercise, and provides unconditional love to our beloved children.
Shelters currently hold pets beyond their originally designed capacity. Pets get dropped off or picked up off the streets for so many reasons. Animals get taken to, or not taken from shelters because they are either strays, victims of abuse, present behavioral issues, left behind due to family moving, abandon from different family experiences, not bought from overpricing, or the family had no time for it. All of which result in psychological effects of trust issues, loneliness, feeling unloved, anxiety, and
Should the State Euthanize Dogs for Biting Dogs that bite people are getting euthanized. Sure they shouldn’t be given to children if they are snapping at people, but think about the innocent lives taken away. Dogs who were saints, whom might have accidently bitten someone thinking that person might be hurting someone, are being taken away to be killed, leaving children devastated. There is an issue, stating whether the state should euthanize dogs for hurting people.