Recently, there was a lot of debates going on about the United States military stationing in Korea. Some questioned that why should America pay for their defence, and showed discomfort. They thought Korea should pay all of the cost for the United States military, but Korea should not be obligated to charge all of them because of Korea’s Environmental problems caused by the United States’ military, America’s benefits on money saving, and for war deterrent purpose.
In July 23, 2015, Donald Trump sniped Korea with the issue of heavy reliance on American military. He argued that Korea is paying less than half of the US military cost, and have to pay full cost if Korea wants military aids from the America. He mentioned that it is not worth to put troops in Korea with the American taxes. In fact, Donald Trump is wrong. Korea’s payment on the American troops was about 870 million dollars.
…show more content…
Currently, America spends nearly 54% of their federal budget, a total of 598.5 billion dollars (@natpriorities). If the United States military leaves Korea, America will need to put more money in the military budget. This is burdensome for the ordinary American person because they need to pay more taxes when stationary forces of America return. Otherwise, they have to layoff military forces which will create thousands of unemployed people. However, keeping the troops in Korea will not only reduce the military budget, but it will also give America good friends. By protecting Korean territory from enemies such as North Korea, Korea will appreciate America with their help. Korea will fully support America and will be willing to help the America at any time. For example, when deciding the world pact or policy, Korea will respect the official opinion of the America and will be willing to support it. So it is not a good idea to remove American military from Korea (General: Cheaper to Keep Troops in South
The Korean War was a proxy war fought between the United States and the USSR, for the purpose of gaining power and political influence in other parts of the world. Since the end of WWII, the USSR and the United States became very hostile against one another, creating what came to be called “The Cold War“ coined by Bernard Baruch in 1947 from the lack of there ever being direct battles against one another. From the result of the bitter and cold rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union came a large chain of indirect battling over political influence in developing or war-torn countries. As this feud occurred the people of the United States mainly wanted there to be a change in Korea out of this war [Doc E], but what was occurring
In an interview with history instructor, Melinda Pash, she explains, “When the war first broke out, people worried that American involvement would usher in the same type of rationing and full mobilization that had characterized the Second World War. That failed to occur and within a few months, most Americans turned back to their own lives, ignoring the conflict raging half a world away”(Pash). The fact that even in when the war was happening, people still choose to forget about the Korean War, if the first generation chooses to ignore the war, then later generations after will never know about the
Since the Korean War, all American presidents have pursued the same basic policy toward the Korean Peninsula. The first priority for American presidents has been protecting, nurturing and promoting South Korea. During the Cold War, U.S. leaders regarded it as essential to check communist expansion and the deaths of nearly 34,000 Americans in the Korean War made it politically unacceptable at home to again risk the loss of South Korea. This led to the signing of a security treaty with the ROK in 1953, the stationing of American military forces in South Korea to this day and large-scale support for South Korea in earlier decades. Due to South Korea’s later economic success and democratization, Americans came to regard it as a model of the benefits
South Korea didn’t want to be a contribution to communism, where North Korea believed that communism was the solution to all problems. This invasion caused and all out war the involved many other countries like Russia and the US. As stated in “Document C”, Russia’s job was to help North Korea and promote their communists government, where the US was there to help South Korea promote their capitalism. Several years after continuously fighting on whether Korea should have a communist or capitalists government, the war finally ended. The country is still divided today and North Korea still remains communists leaving the US failing to stop communism.
Korea’s history already determined it was a weak country, having been a pawn for Far Eastern powers, so Cold War had left it nearly destroyed with epidemics, poverty, limited education, and authoritarian rulers (LaFeber, 2008). In this state, Korea was left vulnerable to communism. In 1945, the 38th parallel marked the ally agreement of disarming the occupying Japanese military, however by the end of the Korean War, it would be the indivisible line that divided the country between communism and democracy (LaFeber, 2008). In June 1950, when North Korean troops passed the 38th parallel, President Truman gave the order for American air and naval units to move into action to aid South Korea and to show the United States’ opponents that “the United States was no longer content with mere “containment” but now aimed for liberation (LaFeber, 2008, p. 114). LaFeber (2008) explains President Truman’s intent, “
Although, it also frequently denotes the various shortcomings of the US recapture and invasion of South Korean and North Korea respectively. This bias does not entirely take away from this excerpt as it is true that the US - South Korean treaty is different from many others and that Korea has since risen to a global economic superpower. This perspective about the Korean legacy resulting from the war shows that not all effects of the Korean war were entirely negative but all positives were hard fought and paid for with the blood, pain and lives of
Showing that with this military operation to stop communism have cost them so much money and they are not gaining any grown over the North Korean military. In the end, the outcome of this war was not of any good, sated by (Campbell) " After three years of grinding destruction, both sides were forced to settle for essentially the status quo ante bellum". Meaning it was the same as it was when the war has not even started in several years ago. Making the Unites states think about reducing its military spending due to the fact that they have contributed so much money to something and it turned out the same as when it has started.
The biggest challenges faced by America in the Korean War were, Korea not being able to defend itself, tactics Korean communist troops used against America and soldiers thinking the war as useless while questioning “What are we fighting for?” The Korean War lasted from 1950 to 1953, beginning when the North Korean communist army crossed the 38th parallel and invaded non-communist South Korea. As Kim II-sung's North Korean troops armed with soviet tanks, quickly overran South Korea and the United States came to South Korea's aid. If South Korea was not able to carry itself without the Unite States and the Soviet Union getting involved then that would cause another world war, because all of Korea would become communist because of North Korea
The result was the U.S withdrawal in 1975. Ho Chi Minh was admired by people and Americans were seen as imperalists Americans went back home against the war. Korean War The Soviets forced a communist government on North Korea. This led to the formation of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in 1948.
However, the United States’ participation was not declared by the U. S. Congress, but when North Korean’s intention to take over South Korea were identified, President Harry Truman “ordered naval and air forces into action.” (Greenspan, 2013) The United States just intentions were based on stopping the spread of Communism not only within the nation, but internationally wide. Thus, although the Korean War had many casualties, according to the Jus Ad Bellum principle, the United States’ participation was
American engaged war to provide aid to South Korea and help them fight off an attack by North Koreans. In contrast, North Korea opted to ignore the UN demand for withdrawal, the Security Council decided to help South Korea repel the invasion. (Stewart pg. 224) Nevertheless, General Douglas-Mac Arthur, the overseer of the post-WWW II, ordered the U.S. armed force to back off the North Koreans at Pusan.
At its outset, South Korea had asked the United States to supply
South Korea was modernized post-war with the help of the US. The North Korean economy was able to recover of being supported and dependent on Russia post-war, but when the Soviet Union collapsed, the country went into crisis. A ceasefire was signed, without the South Korean president, and consequently, both countries are still at war.
And analyzing the situation of the Korean War and the Cold War, the main purpose and cause of the war seem to be to make democracy the dominant system and stop the spread of communism. As mentioned before, President Truman and other democratic countries believed that democracy was the right path in running a country. Therefore, securing democracy in the Korean peninsula would allow for democracy to be one step ahead over communism. The role of democracy was truly seen post Korean
A huge number of the military forces were composed of young students who volunteered in joining the forces thanks to their nationalism. These two recent wars rendered Korea’s sense of identity to be Blood-based and make nationalism an important asset in politics (Shin, 2006, p2). Meaning, in the status quo, it takes more than having a