Is a Liberal Arts Education for everyone? There have been debates over whether or not a liberal arts education helps college students. A Liberal Education is defined as “an approach to learning that empowers individuals and prepares them to deal with complexity, diversity, and change” by the Association of American Colleges and Universities. In “The New Liberal Arts” by Sanford Ungar, and “Are too many people going to college?” by Charles Murray both men discuss common questions that high school graduates should ask themselves whether or not college is right for them, how will it benefit them, and what type of college is right for them. Ungar and Murray reach level ground when discussing that a Liberal Arts college benefits a lot of people, but their agreements differ when determining the right age to obtain a liberal arts education. A liberal arts education has many benefits; broader knowledge on various topics, ample job …show more content…
Ungar stated that a liberal arts education is not strictly about politics, it promotes the idea of listening to all points of views and not relying on single ideology. Ungar believes the proper definition of liberal arts is “a conservative approach to preparation for life” (230). Ungar knows that a liberal arts education is beneficial for a successful society, he included that if China aspires to lead the world the need to provide younger people with a broader perspective education, or a liberal arts education. Murray agrees that a liberal arts education is necessary, he included viewpoints of Professor E.D. Hirsch Jr. “Full participation in any culture requires familiarity with a body of core knowledge, which is an important part of the glue that holds the culture together” (235). Murray unlike Ungar believes that liberal arts should be taught in grades Kindergarten-8th, because the younger someone is, the easier to retain
Imagine a working class society where the liberal-arts became extinct. The workforce would be occupied with employees that could not read, write, or communicate properly. Although this is only a theory, with a declining rate and the on-going neglect of the liberal-arts education this prediction is not far from reality. When thinking of the essence and significance of liberal arts many authors write to explain the importance in articles, two of these distinguished figures are Sanford J. Ungar and Charles Murray. In Ungar’s article, “The New Liberal Arts,” he advocates for the liberal-arts and all that it has to offer to scholars.
Summary: “Are Too Many People Going to College” In the article “Are Too Many People Going to College,” writer Charles Murray explains that more people should be going to college instead of fewer. Murray states most people should get the basics of a liberal education and that begins in elementary and middle school.
He states that schools overlook the importance and potential of it and classify as being anti-intellectualism. Also stating students
“On the Uses of Liberal Education” written by Mark Edmundson offers this notion that the college network is becoming something more of a pay-n-go than an institute of higher education, students are more disconsolate and looking towards the professors for entertainment. It is becoming less about the education and more about filling seats and acquiring money. Parents could be partially blamed for their children who grow to be too scared to stand up or be criticized, they would rather stay quiet and let the professors be their entertainment. “I want some of them to say that they’ve been changed by the course”, this made me realize that this doesn’t happen enough and I agree with Edmundson that it’s somewhat due to imperturbable students since
Despite Ungar’s points Murray’s essay touched on many valid points such as a liberal education should be learned
These logical claims support the article's contention that a liberal arts education will prepare graduates for living more successful and fulfilling
I don’t think all the core knowledge because that is way too much on the student at such young age. Although I do agree that some core knowledge should be learn. For example like the basics of math, history, and science. The reason why I don’t agree with his statement completely is that I think student should have more times for clubs instead of school work all the time. The student should have more fun activities in school time.
Ungar he says “the Association of American Colleges and Universities found that more than three-quarters of our nation’s employers recommended that college bound students pursue a liberal education… 89 percent said they were looking for the ability to effectively communicate orally and in writing… and develop better critical thinking and analytical reasoning skills” (228). Since more employers is looking for employees with skills that a liberal education provides they would have a better advantage over the employee who didn’t gain those similar
In my opinion, I agree with Murray’s claim that four year college is not worth, job satisfaction for intrinsic reward, and the dark side of the Bachelor's degree. In my view, Murray’s is right, because college requires student to take 32 courses in four years or longer and not all courses are relate to the field they study with. More specifically, I believe that four years college will take more time to achieve our goal and knowledges doesn’t teach us how to make a living in our society. Murray described in his article, “More people should be getting the basic of a liberal education. But for most students, the places to provide those basics are elementary and middle school” (235).
Going to college for many students is just a normal part of life. It is what will enable them to get an education that eventually will lead to get a well-paid job and the resources and the status to live a comfortable life. But for college professor, Andrew Delbanco, the American college has a higher purpose. In the article “College at Risk”, Delbanco states that colleges should be promoting critical thinking among students, through knowledge of the past and the interaction with each other; as well as, help them discover their talents and passions and figure out what they want to do in life. This type of education is called liberal arts and for Delbanco, it represents the ideal education.
Ever wanted to throw down that textbook and read something enjoyable for once? Well, go ahead! Chunk that dull textbook out a window and pick up a comic; it will be more beneficial to your education than you think. The skills and values that liberally educated people should posses can vary from different views, yet the list of ten qualities that William Cronon created in his article, “’Only Connect…’ The Goals of a Liberal Education”(1998), is an inspirational goal for the liberally educated. Cronon’s list of qualities includes solving problems and puzzles, empowering others, and understanding how to get stuff done in the world.
King has provided his opinion about education is building character. Dr. King uses his words to create an audience awareness to think for yourself isn’t the same as you may call it critical thinking. Against the common assumption that colleges should teach their students “critical reasoning,” Dr. King argues that critical thinking alone is insufficient and even dangerous. Teaching one to think critically is no small task. Most students learn by constructing knowledge based on an engaged learning process rather than by absorbing knowledge from passive sources.
It is easy to think college is not worth the cost to become better, but getting educated makes people better, and happier in the future and sometimes even in better health (Leonhardt 25 ). Becoming a better and happier person is good for everyone. Even former President Obama says “‘Education helps us be better people. It helps us be better citizens. You came to college to learn about the world and to engage with new ideas and to discover the things you 're passionate about -- and maybe have a little fun’”
Being educated in the liberal arts field will give many benefits as well as its accompanying widespread knowledge. Firstly, it teaches students how to think through drilling different techniques in the brain to make it a more useful instrument. Techniques such as critical thinking are a workout for the brain that aids you to think for yourself throughout ideas in different contexts. Another benefit is that it teaches students how to learn as it allows them to develop the required skills to become lifelong learners, which will be needed to be able to perform in excellence throughout their career. Liberal arts education enhances students’ wisdom and faith.
“Arts education is critical for helping students develop creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving abilities” (Chernin). The arts can help people succeed. Art is a way that people can express themselves and share their beliefs. Arts in education can help people focus and attend. Fine arts are important because they make a huge impact on kids education, they make an impact on how people pursue their life careers, and it also helps with stress and anxiety.