States that exist in the contemporary world are either carved out of former alliances and disintegration of large units like the British Empire or the USSR or they were made on geographical basis overtime. Developed nations entail western countries mostly; the European Union, Britain or America are economically dominating whereas the underdeveloped nations struggle to cope up at similar pace with the developed world. Among the major issues with today’s world is nation building and state building. Institutional architecture of a state plays a vital role in its transformation into a functional and progressive entity. For a nation to become rich and pursue success, economic stability along with stronger institutions is required. For such stronger institutional cooperation, National Integration is necessary. National integration is the key player in determining the institutional and political strength of a country. For example: If there are secessionist movements and inter provincial civil wars being fought in a …show more content…
Ethnic, linguistic, religious, nationalistic and political cleavages have always existed in Pakistan. State building crisis continued to flourish due to incompetent leaders at large. If we talk about Pakistan in more detail and as far as state scope is concerned it is minimal state and again state struggle is not enough. Mentioned below are some major challenges to national integration in Pakistan: 1. Ethnic disputes like Shiya Sunni hostility, extermination of Hazara community of Baluchistan 2. Political Consensus between provinces on major constitutional and political issues. Kala Bagh Dam is another example. 3. Unjust distribution of resources by keeping some part of the country, highly underdeveloped like Balochistan. 4. Budgetary issues like budget distribution between provinces and NFC award. 5. Water issues; KPK and Balochistan accuses Punjab of stealing their
In order for a proper government one state should have the trust in another. A functional society is one trust is
This concept is commonly accepted to refer to an intense degree of intragovernmental consultation, to the basic equality of the relationship, and to the decentralizing nature of the results in this period (Dyck, 1979). Perhaps the
Because of this it was decided that the national government must be strengthened in order to develop uniform economic policies and protect property owners from infringements on their rights by local majorities
The central government has enough power to help some of the country’s major needs and the state government has enough power to help the state’s needs because the state’s needs may be more specific. From this, you may conclude that dividing powers between the central and state governments prevents
This keeps any tyranny from happening in light of the fact that the states can't take control of central forces, and the central government can't take control of state forces. They can just take the force given and the forces they
Due to this dual federalism promote states to compete with each other which cause tension between
Federalism itself is a main contributor to the protection and guard against
Many factors and events have led and caused the overthrow of the
In the Era of Good Feelings, sectionalism was a very important thing; it improved the feeling of nationalism, helped the economy, and strengthened relationships between the states. But good things always have a consequence, and the result of sectionalism forced the people to rely on each other for their
Inspite of the political factors not being favorable in the
Political factors, like changing government, political leaders and political issue directly
The notion of modern state started emerging in the sixteenth century and with the span of time, this idea of modern state became universal through conquest and overpowering. Modern state, i.e. the enriched and the precise form of absolutist state aspires for the pursuit of central power in the state and makes its way regularized for the national system of power to get implemented. The concept of modern state has been there since the Westphalia Peace Treaty in the mC17. But even before that peace treaty, the similar form of state was there in the form of imperialism and there existed the princely states which used to be governed by the imperial authorities. Now with the formation of modern state the other forms of power structures has become weak and has now been exhausted.
As examining the Indo-Pakistani conflict through rationalist lenses should not be radically denied, this thesis will test conventional constructivism as a method in studying Pakistan 's situation. 4. Post-Colonialism I will explain the basic assumptions of Post-Colonialism, its usefulness and its weaknesses. Its operative characteristics.
It believes that all individuals are born with an increasing desire to own power hardwired inside them. In these circumstances dominant states should do direct high power over their rivals. In the other hand, structural realism does not define the quest for power, instead it is focused on the structure of the international
INTRODUCTION Geo Politics is defined as the impact created by a country on other neighbouring countries due to its Geopolitical position. This impact also affects the politics of the region as a whole. Pakistan is at a location which is of great importance in political ,strategic and economic sectors. It has been centre of activities of great powers since the start and has witnessed intervention of three great powers i.e Britain, USSR, and USA. Pakistan is located in Southern Asia and shares border with four countries which include India, Afghanistan, China and Iran all of which are of great importance in the international politics and play a major role in it.