1. Historical Context
Prior to the 20th century, many things had happened in Europe and Africa. Although Africa was a place with severe famine, widespread diseases and natural disasters, Africa was at the same time found to be a “hidden gem” of rich resources - which attracted unprecedented attention from the West and results to fervent interest in “Scramble for Africa” (1884-5). Moreover, it was the period when Europeans painstakingly invented and crafted their traditions and decided elements of their culture were to be shared and promoted to Africa. As a result, the many events have motivated Europeans to rush to Africa, not only was it an open door for the West to influence a neighboring continent, but also an opportunity for Europeans of lower class to climb the social mobility ladder concurrently. Ranger
…show more content…
Rise of nationalism
As time pass, Africans from different societies form tribes and strive to create their own customs through laws, political system and rights to distinguish themselves from other communities and entitle their people with special privileges. Take the example of Tanganyika, where tribes are under indirect control – formation of these tribes would refine racial thinking in German times, and administrators insisted that all Africans belonged to a tribe, much like how each European belonged to a nation.
However, later on in the 20th century, African intellectuals had come to realize that modernizing changes does not occur in small –scale African communities, but in large-scale kingdoms. As a result, a rise of nationalism was stimulated over tribal traditions. Ranger supported his point by citing the King George IV’s visit to Northern Rhodesia in 1947, when the loyal address made included several nationalist elements. This marked the beginning of the era when African groups would invent their very own traditions with nationalist elements and later on would even express their national sovereignty by means of national anthems, flags and
Ghana fought for Independence; the movement being led by Kwame Nkrumah. He believed that the land did not belong to the European’s, so they wanted freedom from their rule. The British ended up approving Ghana’s cries for independence and by 1957 they were free from British rule. ( Doc. 6 ) In Kenya, their president Jomo Kenyatta led their fight for independence from the Europeans.
European contact with sub-Saharan Africa around the 1500’s was not mutually beneficial because they had different needs. The economic exchanges and political relationships were based off of European’s relations with the Upper class of Africa, however not the majority of Africa. Due to the massive expansion of Europe, they wanted to continue to grow, and the only way to do that was to open trading ports all around the world. In the end, Europe benefited from trading with Africa and they are the ones who ended up
Europe’s encroachment upon Africa revolutionized their society, however the
During the 15th century, the world was caught in the age of exploration. After Columbus, everyone realized that there were still undiscovered land masses that held numerous resources and extreme profit. Due to the fact that the Americas were occupied by Spain and Portugal, much of Europe turned its eyes to Africa. Consequently, Africa was a huge land mass that was just waiting to be explored, especially since Portugal hadn’t gone beyond the outer edge. The reasons for European imperialism in Africa were due to the want for more resources to boost the economy, the advantage of better technology, and a need to establish a position of power.
The Berlin conference had taken place in 1884-1885, following the event, these countries ‘scrambled’ to obtain and govern the colonies. While the British were attempting to expand, in 1891 they had offered their ‘protection’ to the Ashanti state, which they had rejected. The English were offering their hand to independent states and in hopes of obtaining the state could use the territory for their own purposes. Similarly in document 3, a letter was addressed to other christian nations who dominated the African continent, regarding the lost land they wish to retake. However, the Ethiopian leader clearly stated their desire to stay independent.
Europe colonized Africa seeking mutual benefits of the European industry and supposedly of Africans as well. While before 1850, Europe only had control and access to a small percent of the African continent, European nations had gained control of most of Africa and had access to most of its resources and markets by 1914 (Doc 6). This displayed an entirely new opportunity for European nations to gain much wealth and power from new resources and customers. As for the Africans, before the arrival of Europe, war, human sacrifice, witch doctors, and slave-trade among African natives were common. Believed to be savages, Africans had much to appreciate from learning the European conduct of justice and humanity, according to imperialists.
Even in, European countries during this era, the “Scramble for Africa” where the Europeans were fighting for leadership in African
European expansion into Africa created great controversy. Within approximately half of a century, Europeans had gained control of all African lands except for Ethiopia and Liberia, (Doc. 4). By taking their land and power, European nationalism had occupied full control of the continent. Technology also played an important role in the removal of many occupations. Since machinery was taking the place of workers, factories needed less workers to operate the equipment.
These are nationalism, culture attitude, and economics. In the long run the race for Africa led to a war within Europe. Africa on this day still has European influences in their everyday lives. To this day Africans still strive to survive. Europe strives to be one of the top countries in the world
Chapter 2 begins with the Heritage of Colonialism. This is an important aspect for the remainder of the book. Without understanding where African politics started and how it related to the world, one would not be able to appreciate the growth the nation has had. The author of this chapter, Crawford Young begins to explain European
The effects of imperialism was quite chaotic in the beginning causing an up rise from Africa and the Middle East. At first both resisted but over time western ways was making it’s way into a part of the daily routine. The imperialism started with Africa and eventually moved into the Middle East, but when it started in Africa it was for the natural resources the country possessed at the time. The Middle East was different due to the ruler at the time, Muhammad Ali was the ruler of Egypt and wanted to modernize Egypt the way he wanted to. He is sometimes known as “Father of Modern Egypt” although when he died they was not a leader that was as strong as he was to hold up his empire.
What was the driving force behind European Imperialism in Africa? Between 1500 and 1800 the Europeans knew little about the interior of Africa their presence was to buy and sell slaves for pots, cloth, and weapons and set sail to America. Late as 1870 ten percent of Africa was under Europeans control and most was along edges by 1914 ninety percent of Africa was in control four years later. Due to the countries that held African colonies in 1914 that involved the British, German, Italian, Portuguese, Spain, and Belgian. France and Britain were the main conquer in African colonies, because there conqueror of land in Africa.
In Basil Davidson’s video, “Different but Equal”, Davidson examines ancient Africa, and how Africans were perceived in ancient and modern times. Davidson discusses pre-colonized Africa and its history, and how racism prevailed in the past and in modern day. By discussing early civilizations, as well as modern day perspectives, Davidson allows the viewer to have expansive information on how individuals view Africans and their culture. In Davidson’s video, he discusses how people in the past have viewed Africa and African culture, and how that relates to our perception of Africa in modern times.
This is an example of what they had to do to become the strongest. Nationalism is a patriotic effort to make their country better. And that is what Europe did, which helped them take over Africa. This is just another example of a driving force that Europe
The Warwick debate provides approaches to the study of nationalism. It laid the foundation for the development of two approaches to the study of nationalism. The first approach is Smith’s primordial approach and the other is Gillnets modernist approach. Smith’s argument begins with the definition of nationalism and the difference between a state and a nation.