that human was created based on the images of God and most of their views about life and creation comes from there. This perspective is the same as mine because I also have faith in God. Therefore, I think Natural Science is considered as knowledge from stories, because both of Science theory that I mentioned above have not been proven, some people believe but the others not. However, without stories or imagination, science is just like a dictionary. Basically in the past we are not so good at solving a formula, and we never know the suitable methods to solve the problems. Therefore, imagination plays an important role in here to play with the equations and imagine how it can be apply in every variation of cases. In addition to imagination, …show more content…
To explain this statement, I am going to use the story of Pitung. The story tells about a man named Pitung from Rawa Belong that have a power of invulnerable to missile where he learnt it from Haji Naipin, then he decided to help poor people by robbed the property of wealthy people and it makes rich people got angry. At last, Pitung got shot by the controller of Rawa Belong. However, many people not believe that the story of Pitung is not real and it is only a story because in their religion and faith that they have, nobody can have power to be invulnerable to missile just like what Pitung have. But some people do believe that it is a story as well as fact, because they believe that the funeral in Rawa Belong is exactly the grave of Pitung .Also in North of Jakarta where they believe that Pitung’s house is in there. Therefore, some of them believe that the story is valid due to some facts that appear. Personally, I do not believe Pitung story because back to my religion, where I do not believe in human’s power like being invulnerable, because in the bible I believe in God’s power, and every human power only comes from Him, but the power is not to being invulnerable to missile like what Pitung’s
M1, Introduction There is always a question which can’t be answered by scientist all of which relate to the perceptions of science as there is difference in how science is currently addressed. Also, people have different believes, opinions and interpretation of science in general. Questions science is currently addressing- cure for cancer?
Scientists take the unknown and make it known. The audience will better understand the scientific method if it seems logical. Including examples of Einstein, accepting scientific theories, and designing experiments show that the basis of Barry’s argument is factual. “Einstein refused to accept his own theory until his predictions were tested,” showing even the best of the best scientists study with uncertainty. Barry’s appeal to logos helps characterize the intellectual side of science.
Isaac Newton discovered the law of gravity. However, while following his discovery, he finds out that the solar system would be unstable because of the pulling of the planets against each other and believes that God is involved in creating stability. This fact clearly indicates that an individual must acquire insight of nature to understand science Therefore, from this perspective, it is clear that religion and science complement each
Throughout history, many different people have wondered how life on Earth started. Different cultures came up with many different ideas on how life was created and used these ideas to create stories. Today we call these stories origin myths. The Native Americans had many different origin myths. Almost every tribe had their own individual story.
The most surprising world view I discovered in the book, The Transforming Vision, by Walsh and Middleton was the ability for a follower of Christ to be open-minded toward other cultures that are different in their beliefs, practices, and values. The reading has taught me not to be so one-sided on issues, but to listen to others who have a different perspective than I do. We all come from different backgrounds and not everyone shares the same values. The book gives examples of how each culture practices their traditions and customs. For example, the Japanese value the trait of loyalty.
Although it can be confusing at times, the author made it clear that what he is writing may or may not be facts but it is what he believe is that truth. In spite the fact that this book is interesting to me, the writing style decrease my understanding to the book. While reading this book, I notice that I was starting to doubt the author and his story due to how he had mentioned that his story may or may not be true. Regardless of how confusing the book prove to be the case, it is his life story and it is fair for him to blurs the line between fiction and fact in these story.
The Differences The novel The Natural by Bernard Malamud displays a tragic story about a man with many flaws show extraordinary skills in baseball, with a depressing ending of disgrace. The movie, however, displays the story of a respectable guy dealing with a few unlucky happenings while also showing his natural talent in the sport of baseball. The movie and the book have some big differences include Iris, who she is and her relation with Roy, Roy’s aspects, and the ending. The two works have clear differences that arguably change the story totally.
Also the power of religion inspired this because the man broke majority of the Ten
Within this paper I am going to explore and discuss what a worldview is and the dissimilar purposes it roles in counselling. Then I will explore how my worldview interacts with the solution focused therapy (SFT) approach, and in additional I will also look into the historical development of solution focused therapy and the possible place it have in my worldview today Worldview is a word used to describe the way you perceive life, or things around you. We all have different worldview in regards to our traditions and personal experiences they all come from the way we are all brought up to believes. In all-purpose our worldview is what we practice to understand life around us. It a belief that people acknowledge and surround themselves with.
Historical knowledge and science provide a point where biblical and cultural stories collide (Goheen & Bartholomew, p. 130). Culture is communicated through common stories and events. Science or the human desire to explain what is seen can be identified within Greek mythology throughout history to the postmodern views of today. The Christian worldview provides a basis for belief in a creator, not dependent on human action continue existence (Goheen & Bartholomew, p. 23). Scientific exploration and discovery is a part of God’s creation.
The Best accomplishments of science fiction can be linked to the genre exploring the relationship between man and his environment and the capabilities of man. This shows that science fiction is not only about technological changes but it is also about the evolution of man and other species. There have been many debates on the story behind evolution. “the ancient Greeks had held enlightened views on these matters, thales believing that all life originated from water, and anaxiemenes that it came into being spontaneously from the primaeval slime. Later, in Christian Europe, the bible defeated any such ideas, and a literal interpretation of genesi generally held sway” Aldiss
When incorporating both science and religion to explain the physical, chemical, and biological origins, one must look at the origin of the cosmos, Earth history, the origin of life, and biodiversity. In doing so, one must maintain a balance between science and religion so that one does not supersede the other. Furthermore, by examining both sides, it will establish an answer that is mutually beneficial for both parties. Starting with the origin of the cosmos, Genesis 1:1 states that God created the universe, Earth, day, and night for nothing. While this story is accepted based on faith, science shows a similar event that resulted in the creation of the universe.
Modern science is typically subdivided into the natural sciences, which study the material world, the social sciences which study people and societies, and the formal sciences like mathematics. The formal sciences are often excluded as they do not depend on empirical observations.[5] We have to keep in mind that science helps us describe how the world is, but it cannot make any judgments about whether that state of affairs is right, wrong, good, or bad and individual people must make moral judgments.
For instance the story of creation was passed down by people who actually witnessed it and believed that it is true. It was an actual occurrence. While for science it has been passed down also from scientist to scientist who believe what they are saying is true without actually knowing or having the proof. Science is the process of trying to understand the laws of creation not proving that is why science is the reason for anything. Religion is an all known source that everybody understand in their own way.
In mathematics the knowledge we obtain is justified with reason that have straightforward theories and laws. In natural science on the other hand the information we collect is firstly obtained with observations which can be perceived in the wrong manner and then carried out wrong after that, in the natural world things are always changing therefore the results we get now won’t necessarily be correct one hundred years down the line therefore the knowledge we have now of the natural sciences is correct until proven wrong. Knowledge is trustworthy in most of our subjects at school but we can never know if the information we are receiving is 100% accurate or not because in the future we may learn that the information we have is