Military service can be described as the services offered by an individual, a group, or any other militia with the main aim of protecting or defending a country against external invasion as well as promote peace. Across the globe, different countries utilize diverse recruitment techniques to get the people to join the military service, such as the army, air force, navy, and marines. These techniques often include mandatory and voluntary military service. There several benefits and limitations associated with either approach, particularly for a country that doesn’t combine both in their military service while recruiting employees to their armed forces. Voluntary military service is usually considered to be the best approach to staffing a country’s military branches as compared to mandatory or compulsory service.
Instances where fellow colleagues overlook incidents of misconduct or corruption, rationalize the use of excessive force, falsify reports or even suppress evidence as they feel compelled not to “rat” (or tell tales) on their associates are examples of officers maintaining the blue code of silence. (Nwugwo, Boniface C., March 2001; Barry Daniel Patrick, 1999) An officer acting outside the acceptable group customs faces the possible jeopardy of being nicknamed a “problem child”. Much research has indicated substantially that, not surprisingly, the proverbial police code of silence does not just exist but actually pervades all levels of the fraternity, is perpetrated even by higher administrators in the system and often expects police officers to turn a blind eye to witnessed misconduct by their fellow officers. (Barry, D P
Also, the fact that he contended with the top man drove his point home: he demanded respect. A man capable of capturing the respect and admiration of an army is a man capable of leading an army; inspiring them, stirring them to bravery, to courage, to wrath, to love, to sorrow, to indignation, to arms, to war. He understood the importance of the way the men viewed him, and knew exactly how to manipulate this to his advantage. Achilles was socially aware, whereas Agamemnon neglected his social
The gentleman is a man who protects not only himself and his welfare, but also his family and everyone close to him, whether it is a military unity, someone from the neighborhood or a dear childhood friend. An honorable man always fulfills his duty to honor a commitment “word of honor” which he has made, even though it could end up in a heated verbal debate, bloodshed or even war. He does not rely on civil government and acts upon his own definition of justice to deal with those who hurt him or his loved ones. Therefore, courage is and martial strength are essential characteristics of honor. Furthermore, to display power and honor to the public eye, a gentleman needs to look the part.
Among these five characteristics; military expertise, honorable service, trust, esprit de corps, and stewardship of the profession, I believe that military expertise and stewardship of the profession are the two characteristics that make a leader excel in the presence of their peers. ADRP 1 defines military expertise as, “Military expertise is the design, generation, support, and ethical application of land power, primarily in unified land operations, and all supporting capabilities essential to accomplish the mission in defense of the American people”. In order to gain trust from your subordinates for them to follow your guidance, a leader must have military expertise. Without being an expert in your field, subordinates will not trust your guidance provided unto them. ADRP 1 defines Stewardship of the Profession as, “Stewardship is the responsibility of Army professionals to ensure the profession maintains its five essential characteristics now and into the future”.
The Tokugawa period
Yes the Farquhar's actions serve the Confederates in the same way and he fought as a soldier. In spite of the fact that the storyteller doesn't expand on the conditions identified with Farquhar's imperiousness, we're almost certain that a well off regular citizen who is on the most fundamental level a soldier would experience serious difficulties taking requests from a superior officer. Farquhar would absolutely be that person. Since he knows he's not military material, he chooses to take things into his own hands. This leads us to our unique question: is Farquhar a hero or a villain?
It is important to maintain our equipment because without our equipment or non-efficient equipment, our mission success or readiness goes down. This is especially important in the military because of the seriousness of our jobs. It is in the Army values "I will always maintain my arms, my equipment, and myself." Army Regulation seven hundred fifty dash one establishes policies assigns responsibilities for the maintenance of Army materiel. The provisions of the regulation are applicable to all Army and civil-funded property under the direct control of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
There was no standard operating procedure for unethical behavior and is there one today beyond the army core values? The case study also stated LTC Sassaman’s superiors were not reprimanded or reviewed for their part in this unethical behavior of 1-8 IN BN. The generals in charge failed to have a clear battle plan, and left it at the battalion, company and platoon level to figure out, which set many Soldiers up to fail in this chaotic theater of operations during this
Being loyal and not desiring the company of other men sexually are ways that a man is able to perform his manhood but the true essence of being a man is to be a protector and provider. A boy or young man who joins and serves in the armed forces meets and exceeds the requirment of manhood. There is no greater honor or privilege to fight and die protecting not only one 's love one but protecting one 's nation. If dying for a country and protecting its philosophy is the ultimate measure a man worth as a true man, then military masculinity is undoubtly the path to perfect manhood. Hop Hip, while men do not go as far as to risk to lives for their country, they will do absolutely any and everything to protect their families, their brand and their money, all the things that they love most in this world.
In doing so, Sherman draws on Cicero 's notion of decorum being indexed to our roles or personae (noting that this notion usefully allows us to separate the deferential respect due to rank and based on one 's professional role, from the dignitary respect due to all and based on our shared, and most fundamental, role as rational agents), and Seneca 's account of how decorum and emotional demeanor can help "weave the fabric of community. " The decorum insisted upon by the military, focusing on stolid determination, respect and obedience, and camaraderie and friendship between soldiers, can cement the bonds within military units (bonds shown in many studies to be essential to combat effectiveness); the approach to decorum taken by enlightened commanders can be enriched by familiarity with Stoic treatments of the subject. It is in this chapter that we find the most direct and unmixed recommendation of Stoic views; the remaining chapters deal largely with emotion in Stoic theory and in the life of the warrior, and while Sherman certainly finds much of value in the former, she repeatedly softens or even controverts key Stoic claims, often leaning in the direction of
In the event of sacrificing their youth, the soldier’s actions displayed a grand representation of loyalty. The soldiers are isolated from their everyday lives, giving them the chance to create friendships. O’Brien is able to display a strong bond between the soldiers when facing life and death situations. It is during this time that I saw the true meaning of loyalty; directing me to believe that loyalty is tantamount to an honorable award. The loyalty I discovered between the soldiers gives me a desire to display the same loyalty to my friends.
This leadership and trust in the General is earned only by blood from his troops. There is no going back from beaning wrong or underestimating your opposition. Generals must possess Leadership, Commitment, and Honor. I think these three thing in a general will win the trust and support of any enlisted men. Many young students of a Military University while attending may never use what they have learned in the class room environment.