“The greatest hope for humanity lies not in condemning violence, but in making violence obsolete” (Raqib Paragraph 16). This statement conveys how nonviolence resistance can defeat oppression and can discourage violence when resolving problems. Oppression is an unjust treatment or control added to others. There are many ways to overcome oppression, nonviolent resistance is the most accepted, due to the fact that during many years, the method of acceptance has created no difference by just waiting and violence only causes people to reject the idea or topic being protested. Nonviolent resistance, specifically, the practice of speaking out, is the most successful way to overcome oppression because it does not cause harm to others while protesting …show more content…
In the text, “Letter From Birmingham Jail”, the text recaps the response Martin Luther King Jr., had to the 8 clergymen choosing to accept the discrimination and hate that they encounter on a daily basis. King believes and gives support for reasons why these men are wrong because, in their perspective, they believe it is morally wrong. In the text, “Letter From Birmingham Jail”, by author Martin Luther King Jr., King explains how describes the acceptance has been long used and nonviolence injustice creates a difference in which acceptance has never brought. The speaker states, “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored” (King Paragraph 11). This textual evidence helps contribute reasons how awareness is raised, compared to other ways of meeting oppression because the direct action in nonviolence resistance can change opinions of oppressors. This awareness creates a change that can spread until a difference is accomplished because a known statement is being brought up. Nonviolence resistance can also cause oppressors to change their mindset on the protested
Sitting in a jail cell in the city of Birmingham, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote an open letter to several clergymen in regards to their criticism of his and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC)’s protests. Despite the fact that he never responded to any sort of criticism, he decided to respond as he felt angered by said criticism, but chose to convey it patiently and reasonably. Immediately in response to the comment that “outsiders are coming in,” Dr. King defends his right to be at that location as the SCLC was operated all throughout the South as well as the fact that they were invited by the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights to perform a “nonviolent direct-action program” if necessary. He felt that they came to battle “injustice”, judging the clergymen who failed to seek out the racism that have caused said “injustice.” Dr. King goes on to show that he completely understands the clergymen’s want of negotiation instead of protest, however he notes that this cannot happen due to the “crisis” and “tension” that occurs which leads to those unwilling to do so.
The clergymen described that hatred and violence were unnecessary to their government’s religious and political traditions. Regardless of their religious beliefs, there should have been no oppositions anyways. They believed these actions “have not contributed to the resolution of [their] local problems.”, which was implying that the clergymen were looking down upon their actions and attempts to placate the situation. King makes an effort to address this point in his “Letter from Birmingham Jail.”, and counters the clergymen’s statement through the explanation of the four basic steps in a nonviolent campaign. Through this essay in response to the clergymen’s letter, King was able to fully support his and the other demonstrators actions and that their intentions were pure and for the better of society.
The writer, Martin Luther King Jr., was a leader of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and was in favor to equality. Moreover, he believed in nonviolence protest to obtain discrimination in America. On April 16, 1963, when King was in jail, he wrote the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” to justify his actions and to response the eight clergymen who called him “unwise, untimely and extreme” in the article, “A Call for Unity.” In his letter, he declares that he is in Birmingham because there is injustice. King’s appeal to pathos and his use of evidence combine to create an argument that achieves its purpose of providing that his nonviolence actions are just, and that the laws are unjust.
Non-violence is fine as long as it works” (X 3). , Malcolm X said, and according one of Erica Chenoweth's books, it does. Why Civil Resistance Works: The strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict, has many statistics to prove it. For example, that of the 323 violent and nonviolent campaigns between 1990 and 2006, the nonviolent protests had higher success rates (Chenoweth 7). This statistic demonstrates how nonviolent methods of protest are more effective.
Cesar Chavez published an article on the tenth anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s death about why nonviolent resistance is more successful than violence. He demonstrates the importance of nonviolence, why people choose to support it, and how different nonviolence activists, like Dr. King and Gandhi, were successful in using this tactic. Chavez also talks about the problems with utilizing violence as a form of resistance. Cesar Chavez wrote about important leaders that used nonviolence as a form of resistance and what tactics made them powerful and influential.
Who would've thought that nonviolence could amount to anything, much less produce results that are far more effective than that produced through violence? There have been several figures in history who have conveyed the power nonviolence bears. It doesn't not lie in the hand off of anyone to take the life away from another, especially because once a life I taken, it can't be returned. When people partake in violence, there is sure to be at least one negative results. Often, much more than not, the violence ends in injuries or even death.
Nonviolence is the answer to achieving personal and political goals, despite the circumstances and potential
Cesar mentioned that, “If we resort to violence…the violence will be escalated and there will be many injuries and perhaps deaths on both sides, or there will be total demoralization of the workers” (Garcia, 77). He created this idea that violence does not solve anything, and will only create bigger problems. However, a nonviolent movement is a protest
In “A Letter From A Birmingham Jail” Martin Luther King Jr defends his use of nonviolent protest in order to accomplish racial equality. In the letter, Dr. King uses ethos, diction, and allusions when defending nonviolent protest which makes his argument really strong. His goal is to make the clergymen help him fight racial equality. He uses ethos to build up credibility.
Cesar Chavez, in his excerpt He showed us the Way, utilizes strong pathos, ethos and logos statements, precise diction, and valuable patterns of development to convey the power nonviolence has in fights for freedoms and rights. First, Chavez provides strong pathos, ethos and logos to convey the power nonviolent actions have to change the world for the better. He applies ethos to show that nonviolence is something that people are drawn to. In fact Chaves presents a great nonviolent advocate who lived during the segregation: “Dr. King’s entire life was an example of power that nonviolences brings...”
In a magazine article by Cesar Chavez on the 10th anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, Chavez discusses the advantages of nonviolent resistance versus violent resistance, arguing that “nonviolence is more powerful than violence.” Chavez successfully develops his argument for nonviolent resistance by utilizing the rhetorical strategies of repetition and allusion. Chavez utilizes the rhetorical strategy of repetition throughout the article, repeating words like “nonviolent” and “we” to develop his and others’ stance on nonviolent resistance. Whenever Chavez states the word “nonviolent”, it is usually followed by its positive effects. For example, in the quote “nonviolence supports you if you have a just moral cause,” the word nonviolence is stated and is followed by its positive effect of supporting those with a righteous reasoning,
When in a violent action the person arguing with you is not going to listen to your morals, nor take them into consideration before injuring or killing you. However, nonviolence resistance allows you to speak your morals and listen to your opponents morals. Additionally, no one gets injured or killed and everything works out calmly. Chavez also says that if people react to every violent action with nonviolent resistance then they will receive support. Others who support nonviolence resistance and would rather see a nonviolent resolution to problems, will support those who take nonviolent actions in a problem they face.
In “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” Martin Luther King Jr. is responding to accusations made by eight Alabama clergymen. He asserts that his actions, and the actions of his followers were just and reasonable. He notes that the clergymen claimed he was acting too hastily but King explains that their actions were not hasty. He backs up his actions with persuasive argument and reasoning. He points out ways that others actions have been unjust and immoral.
Chavez also uses diction to support his argument for nonviolent resistance. Lines 12 to 16 illustrate how nonviolence helps the cause of the oppressed. The fifth paragraph states that people are more likely to support nonviolent resistance. When nonviolent protesters are attacked, people react. In lines 8 through 10, Chavez states that human life is more important than violence.
Labor union organizer and civil rights leader, Cesar Chavez, published an article in the magazine of a religious organization to argue that it is more valuable to take the time to achieve justice rather than using violence, also known as nonviolent resistance. Chavez develops his argument through allusions, and imagery while creating a strong emotional appeal towards his audience. He adopts a defiant tone in order to gain awareness among his readers. Chavez first opens his argument by reflecting back on Dr. Martin Luther Kings Jr.’s life in order to commemorate his death and to also open his stance on nonviolence through Dr.King. He states, “Dr.King’s entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings to bear in the real world.”