For him as a rational being, one would not only ask for the right thing to do yet would also make a list on the things that he/she would want to attain in life or in other words, things that he/she would ought to do. For example; a teenager asked her mom on the things that she shall do in order to attain a great life yet she herself had already made some goals for herself. Those goals that she was aiming were the things that are considered good for the people according to Immanuel Kant. In his article about the moral postulates, Kant emphasized that freedom and morality are inseparably united all the time. A person can fully accept and do the moral acts for he/she has the freedom of will to do it.
How do you define Success!! My English teacher asked me “How do you define success”? Success means different things to different people. To me success is having good grades and a good amount of money, achieving your goals, and happiness. Success is by not having good grades because of your education.
The cause has to not only be about your private self, but it should include a view by you as something outside of you. As in something that is larger than the desires within you. The loyal man believes that the cause has its own values. If your private interest was to be left out of the equation, that essential value would keep you to believing. The cause does not get its values from just your pleasure.
If you know a friend is good then you can trust him or her. You can trust a friend when he or she has a good character. Later on, Socrates says what if good equals to self sufficient? Because that way you need nothing, but of course that cannot be human beings since human beings cannot be self sufficient. We cannot serve someone who has no need.
A person can extend their love from oneself to others in many ways. The poem “When Giving Is All We Have shows that sympathy among two people can potentially be the best type of love. To know that you are not alone and that you have someone there for you can be a very important feature of love that people seek. Alberto Rios states, “We give because someone gave to us. We
This is an act of injustice, it is unfair to the innocent people who were killed. Rationality and Reasonableness also come into play here. When we talk about human beings we mean rational beings and “treating them as ends-in-themselves" means respecting their rationality. The reasonableness of a person would not allow him/her to manipulate and use people for his/her purpose, no matter how good and noble the purpose maybe. If we use people for our purpose it defeats the idea of the purpose being 'noble ' in the first place.
As a conceptual object, there is no real physical form for love. You can’t touch or sense love directly, but you may feel it through an indicator or cognition. Before we have an acute definition for love, intelligent philosophers, thinker, and writers have separate explanations on love itself based on different situations. Socrates, one of the significant philosophers who emphasizes rationalism, uses deductive reasoning to explain that the telos of love is one’s desire. The purpose of loving is to produce good or beauty, the ideal objects that highly promote one’s morality.
He describes that kinds of things are what are judged on a similar basis. Humankind is the only kind judged on morality, therefore, rights must be attributed to all of humankind. It doesn’t make sense to attribute rights to individuals. No rational person would consider it fair to give some individuals of the same kind rights, and then deny those rights to others. Simply put, rights must be given on the basis of what kind something is, not an individual basis.
Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage. Love is a lot of sacrifices. There are things that we need to sacrifice because of love, and sometimes we need to sacrifice our love for the sake of other people around us, and because we love them we need also to be honest with them. As a saying says “Honesty is the Best Policy“. What about honor??
The third formulation is “Act as if your maxim would harmonize with a kingdom of ends.” This means that whatever goals we have for our lives, they must not jeopardize other people 's goals. Kant argues that a person is good or bad depending on the reasoning of their actions and not on the goodness of the consequences of those actions. He also argues that one can be a good person only if one is motivated by morality. I believe that categorical imperative is a good heuristic upon which to make decisions on because it is Kant 's golden rule, act as you would want all other people to act towards all other people. Act according to the saying that you would wish all other rational people to follow as if it were a universal