Thesis statement: Police should wear body cameras because playing body cameras could improve the public’s view of police by showing the human side, help to provide evidence when a person may not be able to, and it protects the officers and public both. Cameras Imagine there is a huge case going on where a police officer is coming under question on if dealt with a potential suspect in the correct way. Now think about the money being used to provide lawyers, a judge, a jury, etc., to handle the high profile case.
One often wonders what had occurred before the taping, especially if it starts at a violent scene or ends before the scene is controlled. Considering civilians and the media can portray a tainted picture of an alleged police brutality case, it is no wonder why police agencies are agreeing to supply their officers with the body cameras. This action protects the officers and the public. According to Newcombe (2015) it discussed finding from the Rialto experiment where, due to self-awareness, individuals conducted themselves better when the cameras were on (Can Technology satisfy policing Policy and Politics section, 2015).
The Effect of Police Body Cameras in Society The implementation of body cameras in law enforcement has increased recently. The body cameras have had a positive impact on society. These devices have helped in the process of investigation of cases and with the protection of all citizens. The body cameras that police have decreased the likeliness of crime occurring because the individuals know they are being recorded.
A major benefit for having body cams is the fact that it will decrease the force used by Police Officers. For the past couple of years there has been many videos of Police Officers using excessive force against innocent victims, especially with African Americans. “The notion has been around for a while. But since August 's fatal shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri -- for which witness accounts varied widely -- it 's gained traction to become part of the national conversation about police conduct.” (Brandon Griggs 1)
Police should wear wear body cameras because of civilian and police harm decline, evidence and clear information, and civilians being with the police instead of against them. I think that with these reasons, it will show that it will make a positive, huge impact on the society that we live in today. I think that police should wear body cameras because of civilian and police harm decline. It is proven in a study released by University of South Florida that after a twelve month period of police officers wearing body cameras, there was a huge decline in the amount of injuries of civilians made of the police wearing body cameras, and injuries of the cops, too. With the police cameras, it showed that the police are careful with how they treat and handle the civilians.
Police should wear body cameras because they can improve the public view of police by showing the human side which can help to provide evidence when a person may not be able to, and it protects both parties which both are a vital part of policing. Police officers should be required to wear body cameras so that their use of force can be documented and judged. It's time to think about what measures can be put into place to hold all law enforcement accountable. As a person who has had two friends experience police brutality at the hands of the police it's time to enforce the wearing of the body cameras. Police in every state should agree on letting officers wear an on officer recording system, or body cams that are the size of a ink pen that can be attached to hats, helmets, or collars of their uniforms.
Recordings could be used as training tools in correcting the way officers interact with the public. The footage may also be used for training programs to demonstrate what it actually looks like in civilian encounters (1802). It would also be helpful in watching new officers. If the officer were to make a mistake it would be on recording and the officer would be able to go back and watch with their supervisor to fix the situation, and how to deal with it the next time the officer encounters someone
These penalties could include pay dock and even suspension (Kauffman 1). A study was conducted on the Rialto, California police departments from 2012 to 2013 and showed the potential of body cameras (Schiff 2). The department had an 88 percent reduction in complaints against their officers with 50 percent of them wearing cameras (Schiff 2). And there are many other departments showing these improvements with the use of cameras. A high percentage
This is why in the article “Police Perspective: The Pros & Cons of Police Body Cameras”, Erstad declares, “...the cameras led to an 87.5 percent decrease in officer complaints “. This demonstrates that by officers wearing cameras people are not complaining much about the officers because they are able to see the footage and see that not all police officers are bad as people made them look. To sum up, Erstad also declared, “This drop in complaints can also lead to a substantial decrease in the time and resources devoted to investigating complaints…” In this case, it demonstrates that by officers wearing body cameras, it can show what really occurs and that way civilians would not start talking or rumoring about things that they are not a hundred percent sure because they were not on the scene to witness what occurred and who was the guilty one. Basically, if police officers wear their body cameras, there would be less complaining and police would be able to investigate another type of crimes and capture the most dangerous criminals who are outside in the streets committing crimes and damaging our community every time they commit their horrendous crimes in our
Perez adds that since 1991 to 1998 crime actually decreased in California by 36%, but the media coverage rose 400% to depict the communities as lawless and dangerous. Many laws and propositions have passed that encourage minority young to be imprisoned as adults for crimes that were committed as minors. Aside from the laws, the movie did not do a good job at illustrating relations with the police. Police are seen as aggressive enemies in these communities. They make life a lot harder than it needs to be.
For example according to the bureau of justice survey,Nearly 90 percent of local police departments were using some type of video camera technology in 2013, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics survey. About 17 percent used automated license plate readers and about 49 percent used video cameras for the surveillance of public areas. Facts about the solution of body cameras on police officers is”25% of the nation 's 17,000 police agencies are using them with fully 80% of agencies evaluating the technology”(What Is Police Brutality? Depends on Where You Live." NBC News.
So many lives could be saved and so many police officers’ careers could be saved through the utilization of this idea and the reaping of its benefits. Whether it captures a citizen attack on a police officer or whether it captures a case of police brutality, the great possibilities outweigh the potential cons of police body cameras and make them a risk worth taking. Whether one takes the side of the citizens and believe the police are typically irrational or one takes the side of the police and believe they are only doing their jobs to the best of their ability, the incorporation of body cameras to the controversial police force would be extremely beneficial for
Critics claim that watching the video will alter the officers ' memory of the incident. But this isn 't necessarily a bad thing. Human memory is a very complex and can change every time. Human memory is also susceptible to a host of biases. Like the rest of us, police officers are bound to remember events in ways that protect their sense of self and justify their actions.
Even though the use of body cams may deter police officers from abusing the law, body cameras also have the ability to keep them safe as well, for the body cameras in Maryland, for example, has kept people from being hostile and breaking the law excessively (“5 ways body-worn cameras have helped police officers, “ 2014). I feel that if people could remain civil as officers continue to do their jobs, the majority would have the ability to live a safe and productive life with their families in the foreseeing
It is unfair to send police officers out into the public with the fear of second guessing themselves every time they make a decision. If they have body cameras they will have the proof of the film to back up whatever decision is made. During a study in 2013 they accumulated stats showing first, Shifts without body cameras experience twice as many incidents of use of force of shifts with body cameras.