Sociological View Of Power Analysis

Power is the ability to do something or act in a particular way, especially as a faculty or quality. Power is the a man made weapon designed to destroy man. Men have constantly been developing more powerful weapons since the dawn of time just to outclass one another and be on top. World wide tension is built on who has the most powerful weapon and who can build an even more powerful weapon next. In the wrong hands, power is catastrophic.

But first what is Power? When researching Power words such as authority, control, direct, command and influence all appear. These words all support the following statement “Power is the ability to influence and control the behaviour of others.” The problem with power is that it often leads to those in power abusing it. As Lord Acton famously quoted “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Macbeth

Power is the ability or capacity to do something or act in a particular way, Power is not only strength it is a human relationships, power is the authority one person holds over another. In the play The Crucible,written by Arthur Miller. Three characters Abigail Williams, Reverend Hale, and Judge Danforth. All want to gain power as the play goes on. But it takes a turn and influenced them negatively. These characters use their power for good but some use there power for evil. Sometimes it doesn't turn out as planned, and they make the situation worse. First of all how Abigail Williams uses her power to save her but lied. And now Know one trust her, they believes she is dangerous over all.

Plays such as “Antigone” show us how they used to live and how we can improve our lives based off theirs. In “Antigone” pride and power are major themes throughout the play and although the play is old it still relates to modern audiences.

The meaning of power is the capacity or the ability to direct or influence the behavior

Deviance can be broadly defined as the transgressions of social norms. It is a concept in sociology that has drawn many different analytical perspectives. This includes perspectives such as the reactivist, normative, statistical and absolutist. In his work, Liazos attempts to define the current state of the field of study by analyzing works of different authors in the field.

Wendy Peterson, Vice - President of sales for Account/back’s Plano, Texas Office had concerns with one of her employees, Fred Wu. Fred Wu has landed one client within the Chinese market, the single largest client of the downtown office. However, there were disagreements between Peterson and Wu on several aspects. Moreover, Fed Wu requested for a personal assistant, which Peterson thought to be unreasonable. This is because only a small number of AccountBack’s most successful sales executive with numerous accounts had assistants of their own. This lead to dissatisfaction of Fred Wu, who decided to leave the organisation. Now, it is left to Peterson whether to cave into Wu’s demands or to fire him or to find an alternative solutions

Power is an extremely abstract idea. One can find many different variations of the word when asking for a definition person to person. The dictionary simply puts it as, “the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behavior of others…” which is a common theme that could be found between most people’s definitions of the word. We conceive power as a person’s ability to have others listen to him, and, most importantly agree with him. Obtaining power is done through various methods.

Power is one of the words that holds great effect. It is defined by Webster (2015) as “the ability to control people or things; a person or organization that has a lot of control and influence over other people or organizations”. In general, a person or organization that holds power has authority over others. Thus, power is conceptualized in the organizational communication by critical theorists. For critical theorists, power is the most important concept when it comes to organizational communication. They view power as a “defining, ubiquitous feature of organizational life” (Miller, 2015: 118). Which means that power defines an organization, individual or a group. There are three approaches that help in understanding the concept of power namely, the traditional approach, the symbological approach and the radical critical approach (Miller, 2015: 118). These approaches are explained fully below. Firstly the traditional approach. According to Miller, (2015: 118) the traditional approach “considers power to be a relative entity that people or group possess”, which means that each and every individual, group or organization have power within them.

Power has a negative effect on those who are in power. It has a negative effect, because it causes unnecessary harm. For example, many leaders throughout history have used their power to demonstrate absolute control.

Power is a tool created by mankind that can give off a sense of control. It can give off a sense of a negative environment of pain and suffering. Power can have an effect on a person mentally or physically, it could differ from person to person, but those who have power tend to not know how to control it themselves.

A general definition of power is ‘the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behaviour of others or the course of event’, however in a book, ‘A Radical View’, published in 1974, Steven Lukes argues the idea that there is actually three dimensions of power, therefore distinguishing between his idea of power and Robert Dahls’s interpretation on power. The three dimensions of power include ‘decision power and issue method’, non-decision making and agenda setting and manipulating the view of others in addition to the system power. Lukes interpretation of power became a significantly huge focus point when deliberating the realism of power. This essay will explore each dimension of power in fine detail and also how each of these concepts

In “The End of Power”, Naim states that power is shifting to three different kinds of trends; the More Revolution, the Mobility Revolution, and the Mentality Revolution. This causes people to be more independent and harder for authority to control. Naim even states, “As people become more prosperous and mobile, they are harder to control and more apt to question authority.” (Naim,1) Naim’s main message actually provides Hallowell’s painting interesting context. Even though his main theme is good vs. evil, the dragon represents bureaucratic authority and Saint Michael can represent the common people rebelling against it. Saint Michael is seen overpowering the dragon, which connects with what Naim is saying in his article. In his article, he states that common people and micropowers are actually overpowering authority by using the three revolutions he stated. For example, in the article Naim analyzes the phenomenon of micropowers; “Micropowers should be aberrations. Because they lack scale, coordination, resources, and a preexisting reputation, they should not even make it into the game, or at least they should be quickly squashed or absorbed by a dominant rival. But the reverse is increasingly true: The micropowers are beating the megaplayers.” (Naim,1) Basically, micropowers should be nonexistent due to its size and resources, but somehow are challenging

How can you identify power exactly? Maybe you would define it as being dominant, or the ability to do something or act in a particular way. As we think about this specific question, Foucault’s idea of power lies outside of many understandings to power. He does not hold any proper value in his idea of power. Foucault’s conception of power is a wide analysis. He moves away from notions which is set to power in a more binary way of domination and force. Power can be as a set of relationships existing everywhere in all sides of our lives from a more small level or to a larger level. Foucault’s analysis suggests that power is the omnipresent and can be found in all social interactions.

It is how the powerful manipulate the powerless in order to fulfil the needs of those with power.