Zoos were originally used to satisfy people 's curiosity to the natural world, which shouldn 't have been criticized. But with the mass-production of poor-quality zoos, alongside with it, the damage of captive animals and the safety hazard for visitors plunge zoos into the dilemma of facing elimination. What 's more, possible malfunction of zoos and the appearance of more animal-friendly zoo alternatives factor in propelling the phase-out of zoos, since it almost loses its original purpose that is to generate learning outcomes. Don 't let us go to zoos; don 't let our joy override that of
Some people should not be allowed to have these kind of animals because of irresponsibility. So first things first the learning experience. According to “Why Choose an Exotic Pet, Anyway?” “Exotic pets are so different from cats and dogs that owning one can be an incredible learning experience.” They say that “Exotic pets are fascinating. With their unique behaviors and complicated social interactions, both with each other and with us, they really can teach us all sorts of new information. But their gregariousness can be a double-edged
Consequently, these programs lead to a surplus of animals. Zoo enclosures can only hold so many animals so this surplus of them makes the living conditions even worse. On the contrary, it is cool to see animals that you would not normally get the chance to see, but despite this, animals need to be well taken care of in a good environment. Animals should not be taken out of their home to become an attraction for people. They should be taken out of their home only to be helped and then
Many say that years ago it was a terrible environment for the animals because there would only be a small cage for the animals to walk around in. As the years have past, zoo environments have improved greatly and it is a better choice to put animals in the zoos. Although many people think that animals should stay in the wild, animals should live in zoos because, zoos focus on scientific study and research to help the animals, there is less chance for extinction, and the animals have veterinarians to take care of them when they are sick. Keeping animals from living in zoos is a rather poor choice because, one great way to study many different wild animals that people don’t get to see very often is by going to see them in a zoo. Many different science experimental studies are done when an animal gets sick.
To gain the creatures’ trust, Fossey went to incredible lengths to stay shrouded in thick bushes and she emulated the gorillas’ behavior. Her work with the gorillas included uncovering their family dynamics, nesting habits, and eating habits among other things, and was key in transforming how the public perceived gorillas. (Naden and Blue 18). Prior to Fossey’s research, gorillas had a particularly unflattering reputation for violence and intimidation. Fossey learned, however, of the gorillas’ gentle and social nature.
Should we be keeping animals in zoos? How does that really help the animal? Can we keep them safe? As referenced in the text “The Impact Of Animal Protection,” human activities have been destroying animal habitats to make roads or more buildings, even hunting for sport! So to protect these animals, we’ve created zoos and nature parks for the animals, but are both of them really benefiting the animals?
Animals who live in zoos may be ill-treated by zoo keepers and get hurt. Many people support zoos because zoos can provide a safe home and excellent care for animals. It’s true that most zoos have a comfortable environment, but we can’t ignore that some zoos are no better than hell that torment animals. There is an information from BBC World News about zoos in Japan. It shows that zoo 's keepers don’t give bears enough food so that bears have to fight for food from visitors and get hurt.
Zoos may not be the perfect solution, but watching animals disappear is not the right answer either. Future generations, perhaps, will be more resourceful than us, and find better solutions. With hope, they will foster global collaboration and species management plans, hence reducing the demand for endangered animals and their products. Furthermore, connecting with nature so that it becomes a valuable part of our lives. You may ask yourself: why not let them go extinct?
Colobus monkey spits off in the order of primate, as humans and apes and all monkeys, and prosimii, are part of that order. Colobus are considered the Old World monkey with the infraorder Cataarrhini. Furthermore, the Old World monkeys belong to the supper family Cercopithecoidea and family Cercipithecidaethere, and the subfamily Colobineae. Henceforth, colobus monkeys are considered old world monkeys of the genus colobus. The Pied include Black, Western pied, Angola pied, Geoffrey’s pied, and the Guereza.
The topic is "Discuss some of the arguments for and against the conservation of animals in zoos". This is an important topic, but it should not be taken lightly because of its complexity. Many peoples know that opinions about this type of question can be diverse and numerous, because for a large part of people on earth the arguments are against, in the sense to enclose or keep animals in the zoos is a kind of Imprisonment And that anyway these animals are overdue and afterwards for the other party, having them in the zoos is a good idea, somehow a chance to see, to have access to rare animals such as bears, the Tigers. .. that one is accustomed to seeing on television more closely and to know more about their way of life. Method For the development of this questionnaire, I
Due to the extreme differences in seasonal climate of western Madagascar and northeastern Madagascar, the primates in the two areas have evolved differently. The northeastern coast of Madagascar does not experience dry seasons, instead having a wet, tropical climate that supports the rainforest. Therefore, there are not continuous periods of food scarcity that would force a lemur into hibernation. Because of this, the Short-Tailed Dwarf Lemurs native to the coastline evolved in different way, instead evolving with shorter tails to more agile movement in the more dangerous rainforest
Dunbar’s research focuses on primates’ sociality, their evolution to humans and certain factors that lead to the evolution of these social settings. According to Dunbar’s findings, primates live in smaller groups compared to other ungulate animals like wildebeests. However, these groups are demographically stable, cohesive and highly structured unlike the unstructured groups of wildebeests (Dunbar 1837). The article also looks at the different reasons why primate societies would change and the effects of these changes on the individuals and the society of the primate at large. Dunbar sources information from different materials, having cited seventy-one