Essay On Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

For example, the anatomic, metabolic and cellular system are not the same between animals and us, for that reason, it make the animals a poor model to get this human benefits (www.animal-testing.procon.org, 3 of 7). At the same time, animal test do not predict results because most of the drugs that are tested on animals failed in humans. Only some drugs were effective when there were tested on them and fail on humans for example the HIV vaccine. It is because the animals are no like humans, they do not have exactly the same system as us, and it causes that when something is testing on them the result automatically fail.

Unfortunately, there are few people can do about it. Furthermore, there is the toxic substance control act; to reduce and replace medications. Yet, many companies are not listing and using illegal drugs on animals. Another reason why they misuse animals is that there are used in the classrooms around the nation for dissection. Around six million animals each year are used for dissection.

We still use animals for testing when we still do a first human testing. If it passes the animal testing with a few side effects, it goes onto human testing, and usually human side effects are worse than the animal side effects. Besides irrelevant animal testing, most animals used in labs were also born in the labs or will birth their babies in these labs. Even worse these animals only know 3 things. And those 3 things are pain.

However, no rodent is similar enough to a human to be considered “safe”. In fact, if someone flipped a coin to decide if a new medicine or product would be safe for them, their results would be just as accurate as animal testing would be and is (Limitations and Dangers). In 2013, a study that was published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) found that almost 150 human trials of a medicine to help with inflammation failed`in humans, even though it tested successfully in animals (Animal Testing…). Animal testing is one of the least effective, least safe ways to test new medicines and

In my opinion, having animal testing is a great way to test out new medications for different diseases before they are tried on humans, but then again I don’t feel like everything about animal testing is a good thing. For example, a lot of animals die on a daily basis from all the testing done on them. Also, animals can’t tell you if something is wrong, nor is any of this testing used for them. I understand certain points to both sides of testing on animals the only thing is you really have to look into it to understand what really is going

Gruesome treatment is endured by these animals and it needs to be prevented. All types of animals can have different reactions to the tests, and it doesn’t give a clear answer on how the treatment will work on humans. “Physiological reactions to drugs vary enormously from species to species. Penicillin kills guinea pigs, but is inactive in rabbits; aspirin kills cats and causes birth defects in rats, mice, guinea pigs, dogs, and monkeys; and morphine, a depressant in humans, stimulates goats, cats, and horses” (Animal Testing is a bad science” 1). If the animals all have different reactions how is it effective for us to even test them before trying it on humans?

Hook- The question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?-English philosopher Jeremy Bentham, written in the 1700s Thesis-

There have been numerous recorded examples of drugs that have worked on animals, but then proceeded to not work on humans. Animal testing is misleading, “94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials” (Nine). Not only does this prove that animal testing is ultimately ineffective, but it also shows how the deceiving results could potentially cause harm to humans. For example, in the 1950s a sleeping pill called thalidomide was commercially released as it was proved to be effective on animals. However, the pill went on to cause more than 10,000 babies to be born with birth defects (Science).

Animal testing causes unneeded death to millions of animals that aren 't even protected under the Animal Welfare Act, and most experiments done on animals are flawed, wasting the lives of the animal subjects. But, there are also benefits to animal testing. For example, we wouldn 't have the polio vaccine or medical steps toward curing cancer. Even though that these benefits do exist it does not give these laboratories the right to abuse and force the animals into these tests, therefore, they should not be

it’s logical. In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use. Others are injured and will still live the remainder of their lives in captivity. Some tests have no purpose in the end. Even if the testing process does not kill an animal or inflict any lasting damage, it’s an unfortunate fact that the experiment may end up being pointless in the end.

Because of their ability to survive so well and reproduce in large numbers, cats have become nuisances in areas of human populations. Each year, hundreds of thousands of unwanted or abandoned cats are euthanised here in the United States alone. Because humans are also irresponsible in their keeping of pets and do not spay and neuter, the number of unwanted kittens is astronomical, adding to the numbers of euthanized animals each

Some animal testing uses restraining devices to keep the animals from moving. Experimenters at a few major United States colleges have all done stress experiments on rats and mice. These experiments included immobilizing mice and rats, shocking their feet, hanging them by their tails, and even forcing them to avoid drowning. Researchers claimed these test were relevant to human anxiety depression. Restraint is particularly stressful and frustrating for an animal, many tests are designed to hold animals in an immobilized state for months at a time.

The species being tested on vary greatly. Some of the most common ones include mice, rats, fish, farm animals, cats, dogs, and various non-human animals. They are all used for different reasons and a good portion of them are taken out of their homes to be killed in a Ritchey 2 laboratory. Animals do have certain rights and laws that protect them, yet labs and testing sights seem to override them in many circumstances. The Animal Welfare Act protects animals in research, however, it only provides minimal protection for certain species excluding mice, rats, and birds.

Research has further assisted in the development of drugs such as insulin and penicillin. It was said in the beginning that animals would never feel pain while going through such experiments, but there have been many times where labs go against that assumption. In some labs, the aftermath of the experiments are so immoral, it’s impossible for one to think what that animal endured. As of today, labs across the world are trying to enforce the 3Rs, which are replacement, reduction, and refinement. The 3Rs is a campaign who hopes to replace animals with non-living models, reduce the number of animals begin used, and finally refine the practice of using animals according to Hajar.

According to the New England Anti-Vivisection Society the anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings. This would be fair to say that we have spent millions of dollars on testing animals, Okay I’m going to use a scenario let’s say rats alone we spend