What would come to mind if suddenly women had the right of fighting alongside men in combat on the frontlines? A place that was once strictly for a man 's mind only - where courageous women were forced to do else wise - not allowed to fight for her own country? More and more women are pushing for the right to fight, and while others oppose it, some highly support the idea. Women deserve the right to fight on the frontlines because they have the ability to reach the same strength goals as men, they would not have to disguise themselves anymore, and plenty of new jobs have the possibility of being created.
Moreover, the successful feminism movement in the U.S has been targeting as one of its primary goals to achieve equality for women in the military (Berlatsky, 2013). However, women must be diverted from entering the military because of the difficulties and risks which can face them in this field. In addition, Women play a more significant role socially. Therefore, men and women achieved equality in many areas. However, this equality should not be the reason behind endangering the safety and well-being of women.
Therefore, who would believe a woman when she confesses that the man who sexually abused her was the head of the prevention group? It would be hard to accredit somebody who accused a head personal, of hurting harassing, and sexually abusing a military female. Women have a crucial role in the active military, being most represented in medical (30.5%) and administrative (30.1%) specialties, and sacrificing their lives in their noble efforts, for the safety of ours. But, female soldiers have come to a realization that some enemies are not just across the battle line, but from their own team as well. The US government should take energetic measures to prevent abuse, sexual assault, and harassment against the female gender in the US military, because it would not only be in the best interest of military women, but the US military in
There are of course both pros and cons to women joining the draft, as there are to any controversial topic. The perks of this acceptance would be career advancement, military readiness, and effectiveness; unfortunately, with helpful pros comes the unwanted negatives. Physical ability, tradition, and overall efficiency are just three to list, there obviously are more; however, these would prove to be the most prominent. All in all, women should be accepted into the military draft, because not only would they benefit the country in political and global ways, but the acceptance would also help those that live within this nation. Women make up just as much, if not more than the population that men do within the United States, and going by age not all men will be drafted into the military
Both the Women’s Army Auxiliary Corps (WAAC) in Lesia D. Meyer’s piece and Ophelia Paquet in Peggy Pascoe 's piece aimed to defy gender norms; the WAAC during World War II challenged the description of the “military” as a masculine system while Ophelia Paquet disputed miscegenous marriage laws. During World War II, numerous women were recruited to be part of the war effort. Specifically, the WAAC’s efforts persuaded many women to join the military. In addition, the WAAC also argued that a women’s military involvement did not imply that she was purely a camp follower. The WAAC stressed the fact that women had the desire to join the military to simply aide and defend their country just like the multitude of male soldiers.
In essence, sexual tension can be an issue which can affect a man or a woman on the battlefield, if women are perceived to share quarters with the men. Many may think that women are too nurturing, which may attract harm to them or the platoon. Whereas,
If there wasnt something that both sides needed in order to be viewed as "perfect", this wouldnt need to be a problem. It is not until we are able to work together in order to come to a compromise to solve the problems. Emma wanted to change the perception of the word "Feminism", as she and many others feel it has turned into something that it shouldnt be. But instead we as people should come together to solve these issues.
Opponents of the ERA focused on traditional gender roles, such as how men do the fighting in wartime. They pointed out that the amendment would eliminate the men-only draft requirement and guarantee the possibility that women would be subject to conscription and be required to have military combat roles in future wars if it were passed. They appealed to married women by stressing that the amendment would repeal protective laws such as alimony and eliminate the tendency for mothers to obtain custody over their children in divorce cases. It was suggested that single-sex bathrooms would be eliminated if the amendment were passed as well. Traditional women started to oppose the ERA.
A common misconception is that women are a distraction to men due to sexual tension and will distract men from their duties, this ‘distraction’ may also lead to rape due to temptation. Women having experienced rape in the past caused by ‘sexual tension’. An example of the opposition 's argument is that women have been raped by their superiors and were told that if they turn in their rapist they will get in more trouble for underage drinking and their rapist will not get prosecuted for the crime they have committed (Moritz). The opposing side’s point is that the men will become distracted from their duties because of women. The opposition also argues that women becoming a distraction is why they should not be allowed to participate in combat; to prevent distraction and by choosing inequality the opposition can accomplish
Actually, men think that they are the only gender who is living in this world because in their point of view women don’t have such an effective role in the society. Consequently, it’s time to prove for these men that women exist in this world. So, every single person should ask himself how women can have a leading position with effective skills without any differences compared to men. Female leaders have more effective qualities than men leaders in various regions. The article “Qualities that Distinguish Women Leaders” has deep information about women who really deserve to be in leader positions and it shows many successful persons who are definitely women in the world.
Yet, women were expected to set aside their personal beliefs to insure that America could still make further advancements without its men. However, women still complied because they knew the responsibility laid with them to keep the nation running. Still, much of propaganda had a purpose to motivate women to lend a helping hand in the war. As Susan Mathis said, “The patriotic appeal had two aspects… ‘do your part’... ‘a soldier may die if you don’t do your part’...”
Army Ranger School, Special Forces, Airborne School, Air Assault School, and many more are considered to be challenging and rewarding. They separate you from your peers, give you advanced training and experiences that nobody else will get, and can elevate your military career to the next level. There is no doubt that female soldiers should have the right to go to these schools, and if they meet the criteria to pass then award them with the appropriate rewards. The issue currently with these schools is that female soldiers are treated differently and held to different standards than the male soldiers are. The instructors of these schools know that females are typically weaker and are more fragile than male soldiers are, and this causes them
I am a strong believer in woman joining into the armed forces. They have different ways of thinking and solving problem. You get more opinions plus they are more than capable to achieve the standards of all armed forces. Women are also more sensitive about things which sometimes is what can save your life in a combat zone. Most people say that women are unfit and incapable to submit to military life.
In the feature article “All Guts, No Glory”, I agree with the author Molly M. Ginty, that women participating in combat. If I was in the military some of the things that might affect me would be probably because of my gender. First, women would not be put into battle because people think women cannot handle the work or bloodshed. They think women are better off bring a nurse for helping men in battle if they get injured. Second, they think women in combat would be a distraction.
I think women should be added to the draft. Women have been proven to be just as capable as men in the military, equal rights include equal responsibility, and by having the most talented people in our military regardless of gender we can fight and win wars in the most intelligent and efficient way. Adding women to the draft is a great way to support and protect the American dream. People fear that woman wouldn’t be able to handle the physical conditions of serving on the front lines, however women have been in the military since the late 18th century. Furthermore those who couldn’t handle it could be sent home the same way a man would be.