The police arrest people who commit crimes, and if black men commit more crimes then it makes sense that more of them are arrested. It would be a little ridiculous, if officers had to bypass or ignore any black criminal they saw, just because they’d already arrested a number of black men proportionate to the population. According to data produced by the FBI, when compared, the number of black arrestees and offenders are almost identical (Rubenstein). “If police are arresting a larger proportion of blacks than the proportion of criminals victims say were black, it would be evidence of bias”, but this data shows the two figures are very similar (Rubenstein). Yes, there is a higher percentage of black people arrested and serving time in the criminal justice system, but it is because they commit more crimes, not because of a racial
Especially whites who were categorized as less concerned about crime, perceived it to be less violent and were less racially prejudiced but are politically conservative. These harsher punishments and policies intend to act as
These stereotypes can become even more believable and allow members of other racial groups to see these characteristics as definite actions of African American
Is war really a battle fought between two nations or more? The oxford definition of war is a state of armed conflict between different nations or states or different groups within a nation or state. In relation to war, racial profiling can be seen as an undeclared war. An undeclared war is a term used for disagreement fought without an official declaration. The undeclared war between male minorities and police forces is a constant issue that is being surpassed in our society.
To what extent can race, or ethnicity be used in targeting suspects for stops, searches, and arrests? This has become an increasing disturbance since the terrorist attacks that took place on September 11, 2001, in New York City. Previously looked upon as unethical ad almost globally blamed, the use of profiles based solely on race to identify possible terrorists is getting a second look. The United States has fought a long and difficult battle against racism and discrimination. Many lives have been lost and many liberties have been fringed upon in search for race equality.
Racism has been around for a very long time. Racism can affect people in many different ways. People are very racist against certain groups of people such as African American and Muslims. Toms trial is another example in To Kill A Mockingbird of the racism. Racism still exists in this world today and hopefully it will continue to get better.
Racial profiling has brought up dubious issues about whether it is a reasonable idea and whether it is morally ideal to do this to individuals in light of their race. As said in the book Crimes and Criminals Opposing Viewpoints, "racial profiling is any utilization of race, religion, ethnicity, or national inception by law authorization specialists as a methods for choosing who ought to be investigated, except where these qualities are a piece of a particular speculate portrayal" (53). In other words racial profiling is singling out a man in view of their race and pulling them over for minor offenses to then lead inquiries of their vehicles. The police expect that since they are not a white American that they have medications or weapons in
First, what is racial profiling? According to Dr. Ronnie A. Dunn an associate professor at Cleveland State University, racial profiling is “the use of a person’s race or ethnicity as a proxy for suspicion of involvement in some form of criminal activity or threat” (961). Dr. Dunn is stating that if police are using a person’s race or religion (i.e. Hispanic, Black, or Muslim) as a means to suspect that they are involved in a crime just because of their color, this is considered as racial profiling. Racial profiling in still occurring in the twenty-first century more often with African-Americans that the Case Western Law Review report dictates that “there are at least two variables that remain relatively consistent: the race of the victim, primarily black, and that of the officer, overwhelmingly white” (959). In each of these studies, the victim was black and the officers were white.
African Americans have been struggling and fighting hate crimes since the 1860s after the Emancipation Proclamation and continue to do so today with the black lives matter and the fight against police brutality and unfair judgement. “More than fifty out of every one million black citizens was the victim of a racially motivated hate crime in 2012,” (Sreenivasan). Hispanics are also causalities in this never-ending battle of hate crime. Between 2003 and 2007 the number of cases of hate crimes jumped by 40%. Several stories and accounts of this is because of the accusation that “[the Mexicans] are taking our jobs” and “are causing
The use of body cameras would be beneficial, since studies show that it has led to a dramatic decrease in police brutalities in certain areas. Body cameras would capture any abuse that occurs between a police officer and a civilian. “Body cameras will help provide documentation and accountability.” (Tweney, D) Because police officers would be aware that they are being recorded, they are less likely to commit any cruelty. Not only would body cameras help prevent violence, it would help the community feel much safer.
The iron triangle, people of the U.S., and racial profiling are all linked together. Racial profiling is a big deal in the U.S. that affects many individuals. Racial profiling is when a law enforcement or a person with authority arrests
As a result police officers have become a major key in the arrests of many people of color. Alexander explains how police will stop and search people of color who are “suspected” of containing drugs or who look “suspicions.” Police officers are actually encouraged in their training to use racial profiling and when a person files a complaint the Courts always take the side of the police officer. As stated by Alexander, “The dirty little secret of policing is that the Supreme Court has actually granted the police license to discriminate” (130). Many would argue that police officers and the justice system are fair and that they don’t discriminate and that one does have a fair trial in court from all the lies the media and television shows feeds the people about the justice system and police force.
MacDonald makes a lot of good points about how the politicization of criminal justice can hurt the entire field. I do not agree that racial profiling does not exist, but I do agree that political witch hunts and fishing expeditions are likely to punish good officers and limit their ability to do their jobs, while failing to ensure that minorities are treated equally. An unfortunate but valid point that she offers is that the disproportionate amount of minorities involved in incarceration does not indicate racial profiling, but just that more minorities are committing crimes (Macdonald, 2001). I’d like to say that I’m well aware that crime is a response to poverty, not ethnicity. The disproportionate amount of minorities below the poverty line
For example, current state-citizen tensions surrounding police killings of unarmed black youth and the failure to hold officers responsible for unlawful actions has roots in centuries of sanctioned violence against black bodies. Coates stated, “In America, it is traditional to destroy the black body—it is heritage” (Coates, 103). His searing recitation of Prince Jones’s death supports the claim. In Baltimore, Ferguson, and across the US, white police officers consistently are implicated and often exonerated in cases of racial violence against young blacks. The unaccountable officer who shot Jones was black.