A DBS check can check if a person has any of the following – unspent/spent convictions, cautions, a consideration status, suitability Information or prescribed Court Orders. Searching police records and, in relevant cases barred list information and then issuing a DBS certificate to the applicant can prevent potential danger. Information released on DBS certificates can be extremely sensitive and personal. Therefore, a code of practice for recipients of criminal record information has been developed to ensure that any information they get is handled fairly and used properly. Working with children or vulnerable adults, you’ll need a DBS check to confirm you’re an eligible candidate It helps employers to decide whether you’re a good fit, it’s …show more content…
The murders occurred in Cambridgeshire on 4 August 2002. The victims were two 10-year-old girls, Holly Marie Wells and Jessica Aimee Chapman. Their bodies were found near Suffolk, on 17 August 2002, by a local farm worker. Ian Kevin Huntley, a caretaker at local secondary school Soham Village College, was convicted on 17 December 2003 of the girls' murder and sentenced to two terms of life imprisonment. The lack of a nationally organised vetting scheme had allowed Huntley to move into a new area and secure a post in a school without the concerns about his past being known. Delays in passing the Humberside police’s local intelligence allowed him to take the job. The Disclosure and Barring Service was introduced in 2011, there were 4.1million applications, of which 20,000 were found to be unsuitable to work with children and vulnerable people. There are three types of DBS check: Basic, Enhanced and with a Barred List Check. Barred list checks can only be requested for people who undertake regulated activity. In practice regulated activity means working with children without supervision overnight. School governing bodies must reflect their decision-making in their Safeguarding Policy. Schools must remember that under the Protection of Freedoms Act (2012), it is illegal to request a barred list check for someone who is not in regulated activity. If Ian Huntley had of had of had a DBS check, then the school could have identified that he posed a risk to vulnerable groups. Notification of inclusion in a barred list, which occurs in the most serious of offences. The individual does not have the right to make
In 1992 Cameron Todd Willingham was founded guilty in Corsicana, Texas for setting a fire in his with his three daughters in the house. Willingham was able to escape from the fire but his daughters, unfortunately, did not stand a chance. After the firefighters were able to enter the house little girls were found dead in the
She was attacked on August 15th, 1975 with his common weapons, a hammer and a knife (Crime + Investigation), in Halifax (The Sun, 2022). To attack her, Sutcliffe followed her home (Crime + Investigation), but she managed to survive with trauma from the attack (The Sun, 2022), although police could not link her attack and Anna’s (Farlex). So after two victims, police could not find out who was doing these attacks. Tracy Browne was lucky to have survived being Sutcliffe’s third victim. Was attacked on August 27th, 1975 with his hammer (Crime + Investigation), and she was 14 years old when attacked (The Sun, 2022).
In the small care home a person who has history of committing harmful behaviour should have an enhanced DBS check and they should not be employed to work with these people. The sexual offences Act 1976 Sex offences are crimes that are covered by the Sexual Offences Act. This legislation main principle is they will check that sex offenders are monitored and that vulnerable people are protected. The sexual offenders will register for identification.
The death of 6-year-old Jonbenet was shocking and gruesome. The killer was never found, but evidence suggests it was the family. JonBenet was a six-year-old girl who participated in beauty pageants. On December 26th, a ransom note was found asking the Rasmey for money in return for their daughter. JonBenet’s body was found eight hours later in a part of the Ramsey home, murdered, and showed signs she was sexually assaulted.
At a first glance, employment might not seem as controversial as topics such as abortion or gun control; however, when given the variable of criminal history, much discourse is created. There is a plethora of employers that are convinced if an applicant has any criminal record, they are automatically unfit for the work force. While conversely, there is a margin of employers who disregard criminal history and choose not to conduct background checks on the applicants. With the rise of technology, privacy of any person’s criminal background is easily bypassed due to the increase of background screening businesses. Angela Preston in her article, Ban the Box Has Turned Into a Big Employer Problem, maintains the belief that “no two versions of
Australian social workers are directed and regulated by the AASW and by the Code of Ethics as established by the AASW. The AASW code of ethics is predominantly centred on the code created by the IASSW thus making the Australian code universally compatible internationally. Australian qualified social workers can practice and are in demand not only nationally but also worldwide. (Department of Employment, 2012). They must also work within the parameters of the policies formed by the proprietors of which ever company, organisation, agency or service contractor for which they are employed.
A regulation in which only certain convicted felons should be stripped of those specific rights. Problems with being a convicted felon have recently sprung out of control. Background checks have made an appearance into a multitude of situations, such as finding a career or finding a place to live, making it almost impossible to do so. To begin, in the early 2000’s, EEOC released a background search that must be done on all applicants applying for a position. With such restrictions set, as well as the ban of any convicted felon to work in child care, health
Schools regularly have many external professionals who work with them, and these can include: educational psychologists; speech and language therapists; specialist teachers; Education Welfare Officers; School Improvement Partners; and physiotherapists/occupational therapists. An educational psychologist is assigned to a school and they work closely with SENCO providing pupil observations and assessments, helping to plan the provision for those with additional needs. A school will have links with speech and language therapists who can work with pupils to help with communication, language and speech problems.
The Evidence Victims In this case, there were three total victims between the ages of eleven to thirteen, all of which being boys. While jogging near his home in Portland, Maine, eleven-year-old Richard Stetson went missing. During his newspaper route, thirteen-year-old Danny Joe Eberle vanished in the early hours
The murder case of Leanne Holland exposed the ways in which forensic science were both a help and a hindrance to the conviction and subsequent overturning of the verdict, against Graham Stafford. The body of 12-year-old Leanne Holland was found battered and partially naked in scrub 30m off Redbank Plains Rd on September 26, 1991. She went missing on Monday morning on September 23, 1991. According to descriptions, she was last seen wearing a long-sleeved purple jumper, black skirt and no shoes as she headed towards shops just 500m from her Alice St home in Goodna.
School officers do not require a warrant or probable cause to search students because the school officers are considered the guardian. Notwithstanding police officers need probable cause to search students. Schools may test any student in an extra curricular after school activity for drug usage. However, the school may not single out a student for testing. Found in the court case of The Board of Education V Earls 2002.
Protecting and preventing such activities is important and knowing the signs and recognising behaviour which may suggest that any of the mentioned may happen it is imperative to act
This process ensures that a safe balance can be struck, between maintaining our professional relationships and striving to ensure the safety and wellbeing of our clients. This is important for the continued promotion of behaviour analysis, but also to ensure that we are well placed to intervene when it really
4.1 Summarise the laws and codes of practice affecting work in schools Schools are obliged to operate under current legislation which means that they have to work in a particular manner and draw upon particular policies, procedures and other documentation. Some essential pieces of legislation that affect work within schools and that mentioned within other units the:- • Data Protection Act 1998 • UN Convention on Rights of the Child 1989 • Education Act 2002 • Children Act 2004 • Childcare Act 2006 • Freedom of Information Act 2000 • Human Rights Act 1998 • Special Educational Needs (SEN) Code of Practice 2001 and Disability Discrimination Act 1995/2005 4.2 Explain how legislation affects how schools work Legislation affects how schools
Basic background checks are easy to perform, but checking a prospective employee’s current and past addresses and run those addresses and their name against a search in pertinent databases is not that easy task. You certainly, wouldn’t want to leave this to chance, if you are an employer, who cares for children or has children, being educated on your premises. Background screening service providers can help your institution obtain the necessary shielding with the required information about your